Literature DB >> 28128641

Incongruent perceptions of the care values of hospitalized persons with dementia: a pilot study of patient-family caregiver dyads.

Lyndsey M Miller1, Carol J Whitlatch2, Christopher S Lee3, Karen S Lyons3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many difficult decisions are made in the inpatient hospital setting regarding the daily care of persons with dementia (PWDs). Incongruent perceptions of the PWD's care values limit the family caregiver's ability to make surrogate decisions. The objectives of this pilot study were to describe and identify determinants of incongruent perceptions in the hospital setting.
METHODS: Using multilevel modeling (MLM), we examined cross-sectional data collected from 42 PWD-family caregiver dyads.
RESULTS: There was a significant amount of incongruence, on average, for all four subscales representing the PWD's care values: autonomy = -0.33 (p < .001); burden = -.49 (p < .001); safety/quality of care = -.26 (p < .001); and social interactions = -.21 (p = .004). Family caregivers (CG) rated the importance of care values to the PWD as lower than the PWD rated the importance. Determinants of greater incongruence included higher relationship strain and fewer positive dyadic interactions.
CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal significant levels of incongruence in perceptions of the PWD's values among dementia care dyads in the hospital setting. Our analysis suggests a potential impact of relationship variables on incongruence. Further research is needed around this overlooked interpersonal context for supporting the dementia care dyad in the hospital setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incongruence; dyadic; family caregiving; hospitalization; interpersonal context

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28128641      PMCID: PMC5529266          DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1280766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Ment Health        ISSN: 1360-7863            Impact factor:   3.658


  40 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures.

Authors:  L I Pearlin; J T Mullan; S J Semple; M M Skaff
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1990-10

3.  Do Alzheimer's disease patients want to participate in a treatment decision, and would their caregivers let them?

Authors:  Karen B Hirschman; Colette M Joyce; Bryan D James; Sharon X Xie; Jason H T Karlawish
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-06

4.  Measuring the values and preferences for everyday care of persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Carol J Whitlatch; Lynn Friss Feinberg; Shandra S Tucke
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-06

5.  Incongruent perceptions of pain and physical function among families living with lung cancer.

Authors:  Lyndsey M Miller; Karen S Lyons; Jill A Bennett
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Do Family Proxies Get It Right? Concordance in Reports of Nursing Home Residents' Everyday Preferences.

Authors:  Allison R Heid; Lauren R Bangerter; Katherine M Abbott; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2015-04-28

7.  Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Rebecca G Logsdon; Laura E Gibbons; Susan M McCurry; Linda Teri
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 8.  The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-13

9.  What explains differences between dementia patients' and their caregivers' ratings of patients' quality of life?

Authors:  Laura P Sands; Patricia Ferreira; Anita L Stewart; Meryl Brod; Kristine Yaffe
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Family matters: dyadic agreement in end-of-life medical decision making.

Authors:  Bettina Schmid; Rebecca S Allen; Philip P Haley; Jamie Decoster
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-12-27
View more
  4 in total

1.  Care Values in Dementia: Patterns of Perception and Incongruence Among Family Care Dyads.

Authors:  Lyndsey M Miller; Carol J Whitlatch; Christopher S Lee; Michael S Caserta
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-05-17

2.  Factors influencing quality of life in African-American dementia dyads.

Authors:  Kalisha Bonds; Carol J Whitlatch; MinKyoung Song; Karen S Lyons
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.658

3.  Implementation of the Mental Capacity Act: a national observational study comparing resultant trends in place of death for older heart failure decedents with or without comorbid dementia.

Authors:  James M Beattie; Irene J Higginson; Theresa A McDonagh; Wei Gao
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  The Remote Assessment and Dynamic Response Program: Development of an In-Home Dementia-Related Care Needs Assessment to Improve Well-Being.

Authors:  Lyndsey M Miller; Diane N Solomon; Carol J Whitlatch; Shirin O Hiatt; Chao-Yi Wu; Christina Reynolds; Wan-Tai Michael Au-Yeung; Jeffrey Kaye; Joel S Steele
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2022-02-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.