Literature DB >> 28127714

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience.

Javier A Cienfuegos1,2, Joseba Salguero1,2, Jorge M Núñez-Córdoba3,4,2, Miguel Ruiz-Canela4,2, Alberto Benito5,2, Sira Ocaña1,2, Gabriel Zozaya1,2, Pablo Martí-Cruchaga1,2, Fernando Pardo1,2, José Luis Hernández-Lizoáin1,2, Fernando Rotellar6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic organ-sparing pancreatectomy (LOSP) is an ideal therapeutic option in selected cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Nevertheless, given the low frequency of PNETs, there is scarce evidence regarding short and particularly long-term outcomes of LOSP in this clinical setting.
METHODS: All patients with PNETs who underwent surgery (under a LOSP policy) were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective database maintained at our center. Preoperative characteristics, operative data, pathological features and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Between December 2003 and December 2015, 36 patients with PNETs underwent laparoscopic resections. Ten were functional tumors, 26 non-functional and 16 were "incidental" cases. The following procedures were performed: one enucleation, eight central pancreatectomies (LCP), one resection of the uncinate process and 26 distal pancreatectomies (DP) (15 of them laparoscopic vessels-preserving). There were no conversions to open surgery, and no drains were routinely left. Mean operative time was 288 min (SD 99). Hospital stay was 6 days. Eighteen patients (50%) experienced some complication of which most were mild (Clavien-Dindo I/II). Three postoperative bleedings occurred: two grade B/one grade C; two required laparoscopic reoperation. Thirteen (36.1%) patients developed peripancreatic fluid collections: two were symptomatic and were managed with transgastric drainage (one presented post-puncture abscesification requiring surgical drainage and splenectomy). Four patients (11%)-one DP and three LCP-developed new-onset pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (NODM) in the long term. According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, 19 cases were stage I, seven IIA, two IIIA, one IIIB and seven stage IV. Over a mean follow-up of 51 months, two patients died, one due to recurrence of the tumor and another due to cirrhosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The existing different surgical options must be individually considered according to the location and particular characteristics of every tumor. Results from this single-center study document the effectiveness of LOSP in selected cases of PNETs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Neuroendocrine tumor; Organ-saving surgery; Organ-sparing pancreatectomy; Pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28127714     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5411-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  92 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mohammed Hamdan; Francesco Di Fabio; Neil W Pearce; Colin D Johnson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Jun Sui; Bin Li; Jia-Mei Yang; Shuang-Jia Wang; Yan-Ming Zhou
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.767

3.  Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe R Nigri; Alan S Rosman; Niccolò Petrucciani; Alessandro Fancellu; Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Giovanni Ramacciato; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A single institution's 26-year experience with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a validation of current staging systems and a new prognostic nomogram.

Authors:  Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Chanjuan Shi; John L Cameron; Peter Murakami; Liew Jun Mun; Aatur D Singhi; Toby C Cornish; Kelly Olino; Zina Meriden; Michael Choti; Luis A Diaz; Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Barish H Edil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups.

Authors:  Steven N Hochwald; Sui Zee; Kevin C Conlon; Roberto Colleoni; Otway Louie; Murray F Brennan; David S Klimstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gut and pancreas: new insights.

Authors:  Guido Rindi; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Outcome after laparoscopic enucleation for non-functional neuroendocrine pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Víctor Molina; Rodrigo Vallejos; Enrique Jiménez Chavarria; Miguel-Angel López-Boado; Joana Ferrer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Pathologic Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  David S Klimstra
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.722

10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Melotti; Giovanni Butturini; Micaela Piccoli; Luca Casetti; Claudio Bassi; Barbara Mullineris; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Surgical resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm by minimally invasive surgery-the robotic approach?

Authors:  Roxanne Y A Teo; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 2.  Laparoscopic management of neuroendocrine tumors: state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Riccardo Memeo; Stefania Roselli; Luigi Lupo; Zineb Cherkaoui; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-14

3.  Laparoscopic clamp-crushing enucleation with a pancreatic duct stent for tumors located close to the main pancreatic duct.

Authors:  Katsunori Sakamoto; Kohei Ogawa; Akihiro Takai; Kei Tamura; Miku Iwata; Chihiro Ito; Akimasa Sakamoto; Takashi Matsui; Yusuke Nishi; Mio Uraoka; Tomoyuki Nagaoka; Naotake Funamizu; Yasutsugu Takada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Juwan Kim; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-10-15

5.  Organ-Sparing Pancreatectomy for Benign or Low-Grade Malignant Pancreatic Tumors: A Single-Center Experience with 101 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Kang Fang; Gen Sun; Ming Zha; Shuju Tu; Yuanpeng Xiong; Siqing Yi; Yonghao Ouyang; Yong Li; Weidong Xiao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-04-10

6.  Complications of surgery for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias.

Authors:  Max B Albers; Martin Almquist; Anders Bergenfelz; Erik Nordenström
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Similar Outcomes in Minimally Invasive versus Open Management of Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Regional, Multi-Institutional Collaborative Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas L Sutton; Rodney F Pommier; Skye C Mayo; Erin W Gilbert; Pavlos Papavasiliou; Michele Babicky; Jon Gerry; Brett C Sheppard; Patrick J Worth
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.