Literature DB >> 28127650

Primary surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: comparative results of three surgical techniques.

Dragan Lonzarić1, Aleksandar Kruščić2, Dejan Dinevski3, Petra Povalej Bržan4, Breda Jesenšek Papež5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine which of the three surgical techniques for acute unilateral complete rupture of Achilles tendons in use at the University Clinical Centre Maribor gives the best short-term functional results.
METHODS: In the retrospective analysis of the results of 3 surgical techniques, 262 patients of which 244 (93.1%) were men (mean age 41.6 ± 10.0 years, range 21.5-83.0 years) operated on during the period from 2000 to 2008 were included. Group A (open technique with fascial augmentation) included 42 (16%) patients, group B (original modification of percutaneous suturing according to Čretnik and Kosanović) included 159 (60.7%) patients, and group C (original percutaneous fixation with two embracing and crossed loops according to Kruščić) included 61 (23.3%) patients. The rehabilitation protocol for group C included use of individually manufactured closed ankle functional orthosis, which replaced the plaster cast after 2 weeks of immobilization and permits early ankle range-of-motion exercising and full weight bearing. The functional outcome and incidence of postsurgical complications were analysed from medical records covering the period of 6 months.
RESULTS: Patients from group C achieved the best functional results in the shortest time. The duration of immobilization (5.3 ± 0.1 weeks) and use of crutches (5.3 ± 0.5 weeks) were the shortest. The ability to rise up on toes on the affected leg, to walk on toes and heels, and duration of restriction of physical activities including sports were shorter than in the other two groups (p < 0.001 for all variables). Two reruptures were experienced in group B, one in group C, and none in group A.
CONCLUSIONS: Good functional results and a relatively small number of postsurgical complications advocate the use of percutaneous suturing techniques. The best and fastest functional recovery was attained in the group treated with the original technique of percutaneous fixation with two embracing and crossed thread loops according to Kruščić.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Open repair; Orthosis; Percutaneous suturing; Postoperative complications; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28127650     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-1158-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  22 in total

1.  Percutaneous versus open tendo achillis repair.

Authors:  Amyn Haji; Arun Sahai; Andrew Symes; J K Vyas
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 2.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Alexandra Soroceanu; Feroze Sidhwa; Shahram Aarabi; Annette Kaufman; Mark Glazebrook
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon--a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  J Lim; R Dalal; M Waseem
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Incidence and outcome of rupture of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Andrej Cretnik; Aleksander Frank
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Postoperative rehabilitation protocols for Achilles tendon ruptures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amar A Suchak; Carol Spooner; David C Reid; Nadr M Jomha
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Riaz Jk Khan; Richard L Carey Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08

7.  Outcomes of open surgery versus nonoperative management of acute achilles tendon rupture.

Authors:  Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  The influence of early weight-bearing compared with non-weight-bearing after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Amar A Suchak; Geoff P Bostick; Lauren A Beaupré; D'Arcy C Durand; Nadr M Jomha
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of achilles tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Jason Wong; Victoria Barrass; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Percutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anesthesia.

Authors:  Andrej Cretnik; Milos Kosanović; Vladimir Smrkolj
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.286

View more
  4 in total

1.  Early analysis shows that endoscopic flexor hallucis longus transfer has a promising cost-effectiveness profile in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Pedro Diniz; André Soares Ferreira; Lígia Figueiredo; Jorge Pablo Batista; Nasef Abdelatif; Hélder Pereira; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Stan N Finkelstein; Frederico Castelo Ferreira
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.114

2.  Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Matthias Gatz; Arne Driessen; Jörg Eschweiler; Markus Tingart; Filippo Migliorini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Defining Components of Early Functional Rehabilitation for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jennifer A Zellers; Marianne Christensen; Inge Lunding Kjær; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-25

4.  Suturing Achilles tendon and mesh simultaneously in augmented repair resists gap formation foremost: an experimental study.

Authors:  William McCartney; Ciprian Ober; Maria Benito; Bryan MacDonald
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.