Literature DB >> 20824836

Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Riaz Jk Khan1, Richard L Carey Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus on the best management of the acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified into surgical (open or percutaneous) and non-surgical (cast immobilisation or functional bracing).
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative effects of surgical versus non-surgical treatment, or different surgical interventions, for acute Achilles tendon ruptures in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (July 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to 20th July 2009), EMBASE (1966 to 2009 week 29), CINAHL (1983 to July 2007) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment or different surgical methods for acute Achilles tendon ruptures in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected potentially eligible trials; trials were then assessed for quality using a 10-item scale. Where possible, data were pooled. MAIN
RESULTS: Twelve trials involving 844 participants were included. One trial tested two comparisons.Quality assessment revealed a poor level of methodological rigour in many studies, particularly with regard to concealment of allocation and the lack of assessor blinding.Open surgical treatment compared with non-surgical treatment (6 trials, 536 participants) was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of rerupture (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.77), but a higher risk of other complications including infection (RR 4.89, 95% CI 1.09 to 21.91), adhesions and disturbed skin sensibility (numbness). Functional status including sporting activity was variably and often incompletely reported, including frequent use of non standardised outcome measures, and the results were inconclusive.Open surgical repair compared with percutaneous repair (4 trials, 174 participants) was associated with a higher risk of infection (RR 9.32, 95% CI 1.77 to 49.16). These figures should be interpreted with caution because of the small numbers involved. Similarly, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different tendon repair techniques (3 trials, 147 participants). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with non-surgical treatment, but produces significantly higher risks of other complications, including wound infection. The latter may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20824836     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003674.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  44 in total

1.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Bowei Wang; Anfu Chen; Fu Dong; Bin Yu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Development of an accelerated functional rehabilitation protocol following minimal invasive Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  Mareen Braunstein; Sebastian F Baumbach; Wolfgang Boecker; Mike R Carmont; Hans Polzer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Cochrane in CORR®: Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures (Review).

Authors:  Raman Mundi; Kim Madden; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Surgical management of Achilles tendon re-ruptures: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Oliva; Angelo Del Buono; Antonietta Florio; Gayle Maffulli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Traumatic bilateral Achilles tendon rupture in a young athlete treated with percutaneous tenorrhaphy.

Authors:  Armando Macera; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Carlo Veneziani; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-31

6.  Functional evaluation of professional athletes treated with a mini-open technique for achilles tendon rupture.

Authors:  Antonio Vadalà; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Alessandro Ciompi; Cristina Rossi; Domenico Lupariello; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-07-14

7.  Medial Gastrocnemius Myotendinous Junction Displacement and Plantar-Flexion Strength in Patients Treated With Immediate Rehabilitation After Achilles Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Carlos I De la Fuente; Roberto Peña Y Lillo; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Pablo Ortega-Auriol; Mauricio Delgado; Joel Alvarez-Ruf; Gabriel Carreño
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Management of achilles tendon injury: A current concepts systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Gulati; Matthew Jaggard; Shafic Said Al-Nammari; Chika Uzoigwe; Pooja Gulati; Nizar Ismail; Charles Gibbons; Chinmay Gupte
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-05-18

9.  A new less invasive surgical technique in the management of acute Achilles tendon rupture through limited-open procedure combined with a single-anchor and "circuit" suture technique.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Pei-Zhao Liu; Xin Zhang; Chen Ding; Hao-Chen Cui; Wen-Bin Ding; Ren-Kai Wang; Da-Jiang Wu; Qiang Wei; Sheng Qin; Xue-Lin Wu; Da-Ke Tong; Guang-Chao Wang; Hao Tang; Fang Ji
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Plaster cast versus functional bracing for Achilles tendon rupture: the UKSTAR RCT.

Authors:  Matthew L Costa; Juul Achten; Susan Wagland; Ioana R Marian; Mandy Maredza; Michael Maia Schlüssel; Anna S Liew; Nick R Parsons; Susan J Dutton; Rebecca S Kearney; Sarah E Lamb; Benjamin Ollivere; Stavros Petrou
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.