Literature DB >> 28125760

Resource Use and Medicare Costs During Lay Navigation for Geriatric Patients With Cancer.

Gabrielle B Rocque1, Maria Pisu2, Bradford E Jackson2, Elizabeth A Kvale3, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried4, Michelle Y Martin5, Karen Meneses6, Yufeng Li2, Richard A Taylor6, Aras Acemgil2, Courtney P Williams7, Nedra Lisovicz2, Mona Fouad2, Kelly M Kenzik7, Edward E Partridge8.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Lay navigators in the Patient Care Connect Program support patients with cancer from diagnosis through survivorship to end of life. They empower patients to engage in their health care and navigate them through the increasingly complex health care system. Navigation programs can improve access to care, enhance coordination of care, and overcome barriers to timely, high-quality health care. However, few data exist regarding the financial implications of implementing a lay navigation program.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of lay navigation on health care spending and resource use among geriatric patients with cancer within The University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System Cancer Community Network. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2015, used propensity score-matched regression analysis to compare quarterly changes in the mean total Medicare costs and resource use between navigated patients and nonnavigated, matched comparison patients. The setting was The University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System Cancer Community Network, which includes 2 academic and 10 community cancer centers across Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, and Tennessee. Participants were Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who received care at participating institutions from 2012 through 2015. EXPOSURES: The primary exposure was contact with a patient navigator. Navigated patients were matched to nonnavigated patients on age, race, sex, cancer acuity (high vs low), comorbidity score, and preenrollment characteristics (costs, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and chemotherapy in the preenrollment quarter). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total costs to Medicare, components of cost, and resource use (emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions).
RESULTS: In total, 12 428 patients (mean (SD) age at cancer diagnosis, 75 (7) years; 52.0% female) were propensity score matched, including 6214 patients in the navigated group and 6214 patients in the matched nonnavigated comparison group. Compared with the matched comparison group, the mean total costs declined by $781.29 more per quarter per navigated patient (β = -781.29, SE = 45.77, P < .001), for an estimated $19 million decline per year across the network. Inpatient and outpatient costs had the largest between-group quarterly declines, at $294 and $275, respectively, per patient. Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions decreased by 6.0%, 7.9%, and 10.6%, respectively, per quarter in navigated patients compared with matched comparison patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Costs to Medicare and health care use from 2012 through 2015 declined significantly for navigated patients compared with matched comparison patients. Lay navigation programs should be expanded as health systems transition to value-based health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28125760      PMCID: PMC5540048          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  34 in total

1.  IOM report: Aging US population, rising costs, and complexity of cases add up to crisis in cancer care.

Authors:  Mike Mitka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Health-care expenditure and health policy in the USA versus other high-spending OECD countries.

Authors:  Luca Lorenzoni; Annalisa Belloni; Franco Sassi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Oncology Care Model: Short- and Long-Term Considerations in the Context of Broader Payment Reform.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Clough; Arif H Kamal
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Patient navigation: a community centered approach to reducing cancer mortality.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; J Phil Harrop; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer.

Authors:  Ziad Obermeyer; Maggie Makar; Samer Abujaber; Francesca Dominici; Susan Block; David M Cutler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities.

Authors:  Ana Natale-Pereira; Kimberly R Enard; Lucinda Nevarez; Lovell A Jones
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Effects of Patient Navigation on Patient Satisfaction Outcomes.

Authors:  Douglas M Post; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Gregory S Young; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jesse J Plascak; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Patient activation and 30-day post-discharge hospital utilization.

Authors:  Suzanne E Mitchell; Paula M Gardiner; Ekaterina Sadikova; Jessica M Martin; Brian W Jack; Judith H Hibbard; Michael K Paasche-Orlow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  46 in total

1.  Pragmatic Randomized, Controlled Trial of Patient Navigators and Enhanced Personal Health Records in CKD.

Authors:  Sankar D Navaneethan; Stacey E Jolly; Jesse D Schold; Susana Arrigain; Georges Nakhoul; Victoria Konig; Jennifer Hyland; Yvette K Burrucker; Priscilla Davis Dann; Barbara H Tucky; John Sharp; Joseph V Nally
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration.

Authors:  Manali I Patel; David Ramirez; Richy Agajanian; Hilda Agajanian; Jay Bhattacharya; Kate M Bundorf
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-09-24

3.  Hospital-Based End-of-Life Care and Costs for Older Patients With Malignant Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Laura L Dover; Caleb R Dulaney; John B Fiveash; Courtney P Williams; Bradford E Jackson; Paula Warren; Gabrielle B Rocque
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Age-Specific Patient Navigation Preferences Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.

Authors:  Samantha T Pannier; Echo L Warner; Brynn Fowler; Douglas Fair; Sara K Salmon; Anne C Kirchhoff
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Standardized activities for lay patient navigators in breast cancer care: Recommendations from a citywide implementation study.

Authors:  Karen M Freund; Jennifer S Haas; Stephenie C Lemon; Karen Burns White; Nicole Casanova; Laura S Dominici; John K Erban; Rachel A Freedman; Ted A James; Naomi Y Ko; Amy M LeClair; Beverly Moy; Susan K Parsons; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Forging a New Frontier: Providing Palliative Care to People With Cancer in Rural and Remote Areas.

Authors:  Marie Bakitas; Kristen Allen Watts; Emily Malone; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Susan McCammon; Richard Taylor; Rodney Tucker; Ronit Elk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Oncology navigators' perceptions of cancer-related financial burden and financial assistance resources.

Authors:  Jennifer C Spencer; Cleo A Samuel; Donald L Rosenstein; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Michelle L Manning; Jean B Sellers; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Capacity to Provide Geriatric Specialty Care for Older Adults in Community Oncology Practices.

Authors:  Grant R Williams; Kathryn E Weaver; Glenn J Lesser; Emily Dressler; Karen M Winkfield; Heather B Neuman; Anne E Kazak; Ruth Carlos; Lucy J Gansauer; Charles S Kamen; Joseph M Unger; Supriya G Mohile; Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-08-31

9.  Improving implementation of psychological interventions to older adult patients with cancer: Convening older adults, caregivers, providers, researchers.

Authors:  Kelly M Trevino; Charlotte Healy; Peter Martin; Beverly Canin; Karl Pillemer; Jo Anne Sirey; M Cary Reid
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  InSight Care Pilot Program: Redefining Seeing a Patient.

Authors:  Bobby Daly; Gilad Kuperman; Alice Zervoudakis; Abigail Baldwin Medsker; Ankita Roy; Alice S Ro; Javiera Arenas; Hrudaya Veena Yanamandala; Raj Kottamasu; Rori Salvaggio; Jessie Holland; Stephanie Hirsch; Chasity B Walters; Tara Lauria; Kim Chow; Aaron Begue; Margarita Rozenshteyn; Melissa Zablocki; Amandeep K Dhami; Nicholas Silva; Emily Brown; Lauren L Katzen; Yeneat O Chiu; Claire Perry; Stefania Sokolowski; Isaac Wagner; Stephen R Veach; Rachel N Grisham; Chau T Dang; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Brett A Simon; Wendy Perchick
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.