| Literature DB >> 28125030 |
Shanshan Li1, Keke Qian2, Shan Wang3, Kaiqiang Liang4, Wei Yan5.
Abstract
Methyl tert-butyl ether (Entities:
Keywords: PPy/GAC; active carbon; biological filtration; carrier; methyl tert-butyl ether; polypyrrole
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28125030 PMCID: PMC5334667 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14020113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the laboratory column experiments showing the culture vessel (A); reactor with different adsorbents (B); and MTBE-containing (Methyl tert-butyl ether) solution vessel (C). The red line represents recirculation through the feeding vessel (closed mode operation), and the black line represents circulation through the column only (open mode operation). Both the vessel and reactor were maintained at 30 °C.
Laboratory column conditions.
| Column | Adsorbents | Time Employed (Days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBCT 28.5 Min | EBCT 14 Min | EBCT 10 Min | ||
| Column A | PPy | 0–30 | 31–50 | 51–60 |
| Column B | 0.2-PPy/GAC | 0–30 | 31–50 | 51–60 |
| Column C | GAC | 0–30 | 31–50 | 51–60 |
EBCT: empty bed contact time; PPy: polypyrrole; GAC: granular activated carbon.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of the prepared adsorbents.
The textural properties of the adsorbents.
| Sample | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| PPy | 58.67 | 0.34 | 11.7 |
| 1-PPy/GAC | 96.34 | 0.33 | 8.96 |
| 0.5-PPy/GAC | 141.38 | 0.32 | 4.48 |
| 0.2-PPy/GAC | 255.30 | 0.41 | 3.18 |
| 0.1-PPy/GAC | 307.08 | 0.42 | 2.71 |
| GAC | 500.88 | 0.59 | 2.35 |
Figure 3Adsorption-desorption isotherms of N2 of the adsorbents. PPy (A); 0.1-PPy/GAC (B); 0.2-PPy/GAC (C); 0.5-PPy/GAC (D); 1-PPy/GAC (E) and GAC (F).
Figure 4Adsorption equilibrium curves of MTBE on different adsorbents.
Parameters for the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models.
| Adsorbent | Pseudo-First-Order Model | Pseudo-Second-Order Model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPy | 0.039 | 0.217 | 0.8415 | 1.42 | 0.29 | 0.9935 |
| 1-PPy/GAC | 0.045 | 0.379 | 0.9118 | 1.21 | 0.77 | 0.9856 |
| 0.5-PPy/GAC | 0.031 | 2.862 | 0.8954 | 0.87 | 1.31 | 0.9924 |
| 0.2-PPy/GAC | 0.027 | 2.434 | 0.8223 | 0.78 | 3.03 | 0.9873 |
| 0.1-PPy/GAC | 0.035 | 1.458 | 0.8774 | 0.67 | 3.11 | 0.9961 |
| GAC | 0.019 | 0.978 | 0.9321 | 0.34 | 4.81 | 0.9984 |
Parameters for the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm models.
| Adsorbent | Langmuir Model | Freundlich Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPy | 0.31 | 0.034 | 0.9945 | 0.386 | 2.163 | 0.452 | 0.8583 |
| 1-PPy/GAC | 0.78 | 0.075 | 0.9843 | 0.211 | 2.832 | 0.489 | 0.9118 |
| 0.5-PPy/GAC | 1.43 | 0.099 | 0.9994 | 0.168 | 3.572 | 0.773 | 0.8623 |
| 0.2-PPy/GAC | 2.91 | 0.177 | 0.9873 | 0.102 | 4.148 | 1.278 | 0.8834 |
| 0.1-PPy/GAC | 3.07 | 0.192 | 0.9979 | 0.094 | 4.356 | 1.423 | 0.9365 |
| GAC | 4.74 | 0.232 | 0.9990 | 0.079 | 4.739 | 1.547 | 0.9283 |
Figure 5Biological filtration of MTBE through laboratory columns with 0.2-Ppy/GAC (A); PPy (B); and GAC (C) as adsorbents. The error bars represent the standard deviations from replicate measurements.
Figure 6Biomass concentration of three separate columns with different adsorbents.
Figure 7SEM graphs of different adsorbents before (A,C,E) and after (B,D,F) the bioreactor operation. (A,B) are of GAC adsorbents; (C,D) are of PPy adsorbents; and (E,F) are of 0.2-PPy/GAC adsorbents.
Figure 8Phylogenetic tree of the bacteria recovered from the different biofilm columns.