Literature DB >> 28124197

Gemcitabine and S-1 versus gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Naminatsu Takahara1, Hiroyuki Isayama2, Yousuke Nakai1, Takashi Sasaki3, Kazunaga Ishigaki1, Kei Saito1, Dai Akiyama4, Rie Uchino1, Suguru Mizuno1, Hiroshi Yagioka5, Hirofumi Kogure1, Osamu Togawa6, Saburo Matsubara1, Yukiko Ito7, Nobuo Toda8, Minoru Tada1, Kazuhiko Koike1.   

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, a total of 212 patients with advanced BTC receiving GS (n = 125) or GC (n = 87) between July 2006 and August 2015 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective tumor response, and safety. Results Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups, except for tumor size (the baseline sum of the largest diameter of the tumor: 6.3 cm in the GS group vs. 8.6 cm in the GC group, p = 0.01). Although the response rate was higher in the GS group than in the GC group (28.8% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.01), the median PFS and OS were comparable between the two groups (PFS of 5.6 vs. 7.6 months, p = 0.74; OS of 12.4 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.20, respectively). Stomatitis and skin rash were more frequently observed in the GS group, whereas anemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and renal toxicity were more commonly observed in the GC group. Conclusion This study demonstrates that GS and GC are similar with regard to their safety and efficacy in patients with advanced BTC. GS could serve as an alternative treatment for advanced BTC as a first-line chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary tract cancer; Chemotherapy; Cisplatin; Gemcitabine; Retrospective study; S-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28124197     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-017-0430-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  20 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Sasaki; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Yukiko Ito; Ichiro Yasuda; Nobuo Toda; Hirofumi Kogure; Keiji Hanada; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Naoki Sasahira; Hideki Kamada; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Yoshihiro Okabe; Osamu Hasebe; Iruru Maetani; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  A multi-institution phase II study of gemcitabine/S-1 combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Kanai; Kenichi Yoshimura; Takehiko Tsumura; Masanori Asada; Chihiro Suzuki; Miyuki Niimi; Shigemi Matsumoto; Takafumi Nishimura; Takashi Nitta; Kentaro Yasuchika; Kojiro Taura; Yukiko Mori; Akihiko Hamada; Naoya Inoue; Shinsuke Tada; Kazuhiro Yanagihara; Shujiro Yazumi; Yukio Osaki; Tsutomu Chiba; Iwao Ikai; Masanori Fukushima; Shinji Uemoto; Etsuro Hatano
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Takashi Sasaki; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Osamu Togawa; Hirofumi Kogure; Yukiko Ito; Keisuke Yamamoto; Suguru Mizuno; Hiroshi Yagioka; Yoko Yashima; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Toshihiko Arizumi; Saburo Matsubara; Naoki Sasahira; Kenji Hirano; Takeshi Tsujino; Nobuo Toda; Minoru Tada; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Sasaki; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Yukiko Ito; Hirofumi Kogure; Osamu Togawa; Nobuo Toda; Ichiro Yasuda; Osamu Hasebe; Iruru Maetani; Naoki Sasahira; Kenji Hirano; Takeshi Tsujino; Minoru Tada; Masao Omata
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer after failure of the gemcitabine-platinum combination: A large multicenter study by the Association des Gastro-Entérologues Oncologues.

Authors:  Bertrand Brieau; Laetitia Dahan; Yann De Rycke; Tarek Boussaha; Philippe Vasseur; David Tougeron; Thierry Lecomte; Romain Coriat; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Pierre Claudez; Aziz Zaanan; Pauline Soibinet; Jérome Desrame; Anne Thirot-Bidault; Isabelle Trouilloud; Florence Mary; Lysiane Marthey; Julien Taieb; Wulfran Cacheux; Astrid Lièvre
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Randomized Phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT).

Authors:  Junki Mizusawa; Chigusa Morizane; Takuji Okusaka; Hiroshi Katayama; Hiroshi Ishii; Haruhiko Fukuda; Junji Furuse
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan.

Authors:  T Okusaka; K Nakachi; A Fukutomi; N Mizuno; S Ohkawa; A Funakoshi; M Nagino; S Kondo; S Nagaoka; J Funai; M Koshiji; Y Nambu; J Furuse; M Miyazaki; Y Nimura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Correlations of survival with progression-free survival, response rate, and disease control rate in advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Toshikazu Moriwaki; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; Masahiko Gosho; Mariko Kobayashi; Akinori Sugaya; Takeshi Yamada; Shinji Endo; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a single center, retrospective analysis of 294 cases.

Authors:  Naminatsu Takahara; Yousuke Nakai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Takashi Sasaki; Kei Saito; Hiroki Oyama; Sachiko Kanai; Tatsunori Suzuki; Tatsuya Sato; Ryunosuke Hakuta; Kazunaga Ishigaki; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Tomotaka Saito; Suguru Mizuno; Hirofumi Kogure; Minoru Tada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Li; Yaoyao Zhou; Yonglan Hong; Meizhi He; Shuyi Wei; Chen Yang; Dayong Zheng; Feiye Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.