| Literature DB >> 28123911 |
Zhifang Liu1, Yun Pan2, Wen Tong3, Nina Liu4.
Abstract
The effect of aging on the process of word encoding for fixated words and words presented to the right of the fixation point during the reading of sentences in Chinese was investigated with two disappearing text experiments. The results of Experiment 1 showed that only the 40-ms onset disappearance of word n disrupted young adults' reading performance. However, for old readers, the disappearance of word n caused disruptions until the onset time was 120 ms. The results of Experiment 2 showed that the disappearance of word n + 1 did not cause disruptions to young adults, but these conditions made old readers spend more time reading a sentence compared to the normal display condition. These results indicated a reliable aging effect on the process of word encoding when reading Chinese, and that the encoding process in the preview frame was more susceptible to normal aging compared to that in the fixation frame. We propose that sensory, cognitive, and specific factors related to the Chinese language are important contributors to these age-related differences.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Chinese reading; Disappearing text; Eye movements; Words encoding
Year: 2017 PMID: 28123911 PMCID: PMC5244883 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Examples of the word n disappearance conditions.
The asterisk indicates a fixation location.
Figure 2Examples of the four word n + 1 disappearance conditions.
The asterisk indicates a fixation location.
The mean and standard deviations of the measures across conditions and age groups in Experiment 1.
Means and standard deviations are computed across subjects’ means. The standard deviations are given in parentheses.
| RT | MeanGazeDur | Pro.Skip(%) | NO.Reg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young adults | Control | 2654(816) | 254(38) | 24.9(15.4) | 1.7(1.1) |
| 40 ms | 2761(822) | 273(46) | 25.3(15.6) | 2.1(1.1) | |
| 80 ms | 2738(848) | 274(56) | 25.0(15.1) | 1.9(0.9) | |
| 120 ms | 2625(840) | 268(51) | 25.5(16.9) | 1.8(1.0) | |
| 160 ms | 2728(813) | 269(49) | 25.5(17.3) | 1.7(1.0) | |
| Aged adults | Control | 3334(1001) | 312(71) | 13.5(8.3) | 2.1(0.9) |
| 40 ms | 3815(819) | 288(55) | 18.1(8.8) | 3.5(0.9) | |
| 80 ms | 3632(835) | 310(61) | 16.5(10.1) | 3.0(1.0) | |
| 120 ms | 3389(816) | 304(60) | 15.4(10.2) | 2.7(1.0) | |
| 160 ms | 3439(835) | 308(68) | 16.6(9.4) | 2.6(1.0) |
Notes.
the normal display condition
sentence reading time in millisecond
mean gaze duration in milliseconds
probability of words skipped in the initial pass reading
number of regressions
Figure 3Sentences reading time of young and old adults for each of the five presentation conditions in two experiments.
Error bars show the standard error each group under each condition. In each group of the bars, the first bar was the data of old adults when reading word n disappearing text, the second was the data of young adults when reading word n disappearing text, the third was the data of old adults when reading word n + 1 disappearing text, and the fourth was the data of young adults when reading word n + 1 disappearing text.
The mean and standard deviations of the measures across conditions and age groups in Experiment 2.
Means and standard deviations are computed across subjects’ means. The standard deviations are given in parentheses.
| RT | MeanGazeDur | Pro.Skip(%) | NO.Reg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young adults | Control | 2347(640) | 262(31) | 21.1(9.4) | 1.4(0.7) |
| 40 ms | 2498(762) | 293(57) | 26.8(9.4) | 1.5(0.8) | |
| 80 ms | 2475(723) | 287(42) | 26.8(9.2) | 1.6(0.8) | |
| 120 ms | 2494(691) | 284(42) | 24.8(8.7) | 1.5(0.8) | |
| 160 ms | 2460(700) | 279(39) | 24.7(8.5) | 1.5(0.8) | |
| Aged adults | Control | 3669(1123) | 351(108) | 7.6(4.6) | 1.9(0.9) |
| 40 ms | 5195(1299) | 378(67) | 14.3 (4.7) | 4.4(2.1) | |
| 80 ms | 4784(1440) | 396(80) | 14.0(6.0) | 3.6(1.7) | |
| 120 ms | 4687(1331) | 396(75) | 13.0(6.5) | 3.3(1.6) | |
| 160 ms | 4544(1214) | 391(83) | 12.8(6.1) | 3.0(1.2) |
Notes.
the normal display condition
sentence reading time in millisecond
mean gaze duration in milliseconds
probability of words skipped in the initial pass reading
number of regressions
Figure 4Mean gaze duration of young and old adults for each of the five presentation conditions in the two experiments.
Conventions as for Fig. 3.