Literature DB >> 15631587

The lexical constituency model: some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading.

Charles A Perfetti1, Ying Liu, Li Hai Tan.   

Abstract

The authors examine the implications of research on Chinese for theories of reading and propose the lexical constituency model as a general framework for word reading across writing systems. Word identities are defined by 3 interlinked constituents (orthographic, phonological, and semantic). The implemented model simulates the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic priming effects, including immediate graphic facilitation followed by graphic inhibition with simultaneous phonological facilitation, a pattern unique to the Chinese writing system. Pseudocharacter primes produced only facilitation, supporting the model's assumption that lexical thresholds determine phonological and semantic, but not graphic, effects. More generally, both universal reading processes and writing system constraints exist. Although phonology is universal, its activation process depends on how the writing system structures graphic units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15631587     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  79 in total

1.  Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Fan Cao; Marianne Vu; Derek Ho Lung Chan; Jason M Lawrence; Lindsay N Harris; Qun Guan; Yi Xu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Syllabic tone articulation influences the identification and use of words during Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from ERP and eye movement recordings.

Authors:  Yingyi Luo; Ming Yan; Shaorong Yan; Xiaolin Zhou; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation.

Authors:  Donald J Bolger; Charles A Perfetti; Walter Schneider
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Hai Tan; Angela R Laird; Karl Li; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Reading depends on writing, in Chinese.

Authors:  Li Hai Tan; John A Spinks; Guinevere F Eden; Charles A Perfetti; Wai Ting Siok
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evidence for neural accommodation to a writing system following learning.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Susan Dunlap; Julie Fiez; Charles Perfetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Optical imaging of phonological processing in two distinct orthographies.

Authors:  Hsin-Chin Chen; Jyotsna Vaid; Heather Bortfeld; David A Boas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Orthographic influences on division of labor in learning to read Chinese and English: Insights from computational modeling.

Authors:  Jianfeng Yang; Hua Shu; Bruce D McCandliss; Jason D Zevin
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2013-04

9.  Language-general and -specific white matter microstructural bases for reading.

Authors:  Mingxia Zhang; Chuansheng Chen; Gui Xue; Zhong-Lin Lu; Leilei Mei; Hongli Xue; Miao Wei; Qinghua He; Jin Li; Qi Dong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Brain bases of morphological processing in Chinese-English bilingual children.

Authors:  Ka I Ip; Lucy Shih-Ju Hsu; Maria M Arredondo; Twila Tardif; Ioulia Kovelman
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.