Literature DB >> 28123251

Nonpalpable intrauterine device threads: Is it a cause for worry?

S K Kathpalia1, M K Singh2, D S Grewal3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine contraceptive device is a popular and effective method of contraception. It can be inserted either as an interval procedure or after abortion or delivery. Threads are attached to the vertical limb so that the user can find out the location of the device. Sometimes the threads are not palpable by the user; this study was conducted to find out the reasons for inability to palpate the threads. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The retrospective study was conducted over a period of eight years; 110 female patients who complained of inability to feel the threads were included in the study. In most of the cases the device was in the right place. In four cases the device could not be felt on uterine sounding; this could have been due to subendometrial placement of the device. There was no case of perforation by the device.
CONCLUSION: Inability to feel the threads is a common complaint by the patients who are using intrauterine contraceptive device. In most of the cases the device was in correct position and could be localized by clinical examination. Ultrasonography can help in localization of the device; if used at the time of insertion it can confirm proper insertion and location of the device. This will reassure the client and the health care providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrauterine contraceptive device; Perforation; Threads

Year:  2015        PMID: 28123251      PMCID: PMC5221392          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  6 in total

1.  Medicolegal aspects of an unusual uterine perforation with multiload-Cu 375R.

Authors:  Leonardo Grimaldi; Fabio De Giorgio; Pia Andreotta; M Clara D'Alessio; Carlo Piscicelli; Vincenzo L Pascali
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.921

2.  Misplaced intrauterine contraceptive devices: common errors; uncommon complications.

Authors:  Vishwas Johri; Kailash C Vyas
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-05-01

3.  Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  S F Heartwell; S Schlesselman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Appendiceal perforation by Copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  S A Carson; A Gatlin; M Mazur
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Follow-up visits after IUD-insertion: sense or nonsense? A technology assessment study to analyze the effectiveness of follow-up visits after IUD insertion.

Authors:  Karlijn Neuteboom; Cornelis D de Kroon; Marianne Dersjant-Roorda; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Colonoscopic retrieval of migrated copper-T.

Authors:  Laleng M Darlong; Subrat Panda; Noor Topno; Ranendra Hajong
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.