Literature DB >> 16304473

Medicolegal aspects of an unusual uterine perforation with multiload-Cu 375R.

Leonardo Grimaldi1, Fabio De Giorgio, Pia Andreotta, M Clara D'Alessio, Carlo Piscicelli, Vincenzo L Pascali.   

Abstract

Perforation of the uterus is one of the most serious complications associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD). According to recent studies, this lesion occurs in 0.87 per 1000 cases, but statistics generally fluctuate between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. "Primary" perforations occur at the time of IUD insertion, and "secondary," or delayed, perforations are usually assumed to be caused by reactive uterine contractions. We report an unusual case of uterine perforation, which occurred 9 days after the insertion of a Multiload-Cu 375 IUD. The criteria for differential diagnosis between primary and secondary complications are discussed, particularly from the perspective of medical malpractice cases.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16304473     DOI: 10.1097/01.paf.0000188083.15245.a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol        ISSN: 0195-7910            Impact factor:   0.921


  9 in total

1.  Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity.

Authors:  Ozgu Aydogdu; Huseyin Pulat
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Uterine perforation and migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device in a 24-year-old patient seeking care for abdominal pain.

Authors:  Michelle Barber; Daryl S Chalifour; Maria R Anderson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-04-05

3.  Nonpalpable intrauterine device threads: Is it a cause for worry?

Authors:  S K Kathpalia; M K Singh; D S Grewal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-07-21

4.  Translocation of an intrauterine contraceptive device: incidental finding in the rectosigmoid colon.

Authors:  R Vilallonga; N Rodriguez; M Vilchez; M Armengol
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-09

Review 5.  Four cases of heterotopia of an intrauterine device embedded in the bladder muscular layer causing cystolithiasis: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Li Wan; Yong Wang; Chuan Xiao; Xin Li; Jingzhao Cao; Shubin Wang; Xupan Wei; Xiangyu Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  An unusual presentation of perforated intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  Su Mbamara; Io Omojuwa
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-04

7.  Looking beyond vesical calculi.

Authors:  B Sureka; M K Mittal; M Sinha; B B Thukral
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2014-01

8.  Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in the omentum - case report.

Authors:  Piotr Zolnierczyk; Krzysztof Cendrowski; Wlodzimierz Sawicki
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-12-01

9.  Management of Intrauterine Device Migrated into the Bladder: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  A K Paré; A Ouattara; D Yé; B Kabré; A Bako; B M Abubakar; T Kambou
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2020-10-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.