Literature DB >> 28123024

DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR Interplay Maintains Genome Integrity during Neurogenesis.

Vanessa Enriquez-Rios1,2, Lavinia C Dumitrache1, Susanna M Downing1, Yang Li1, Eric J Brown3, Helen R Russell1, Peter J McKinnon4,2.   

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) orchestrates a network of cellular processes that integrates cell-cycle control and DNA repair or apoptosis, which serves to maintain genome stability. DNA-PKcs (the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent kinase, encoded by PRKDC), ATM (ataxia telangiectasia, mutated), and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) are related PI3K-like protein kinases and central regulators of the DDR. Defects in these kinases have been linked to neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental syndromes. In all cases, the key neuroprotective function of these kinases is uncertain. It also remains unclear how interactions between the three DNA damage-responsive kinases coordinate genome stability, particularly in a physiological context. Here, we used a genetic approach to identify the neural function of DNA-PKcs and the interplay between ATM and ATR during neurogenesis. We found that DNA-PKcs loss in the mouse sensitized neuronal progenitors to apoptosis after ionizing radiation because of excessive DNA damage. DNA-PKcs was also required to prevent endogenous DNA damage accumulation throughout the adult brain. In contrast, ATR coordinated the DDR during neurogenesis to direct apoptosis in cycling neural progenitors, whereas ATM regulated apoptosis in both proliferative and noncycling cells. We also found that ATR controls a DNA damage-induced G2/M checkpoint in cortical progenitors, independent of ATM and DNA-PKcs. These nonoverlapping roles were further confirmed via sustained murine embryonic or cortical development after all three kinases were simultaneously inactivated. Thus, our results illustrate how DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR have unique and essential roles during the DDR, collectively ensuring comprehensive genome maintenance in the nervous system. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The DNA damage response (DDR) is essential for prevention of a broad spectrum of different human neurologic diseases. However, a detailed understanding of the DDR at a physiological level is lacking. In contrast to many in vitro cellular studies, here we demonstrate independent biological roles for the DDR kinases DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR during neurogenesis. We show that DNA-PKcs is central to DNA repair in nonproliferating cells, and restricts DNA damage accumulation, whereas ATR controls damage-induced G2 checkpoint control and apoptosis in proliferating cells. Conversely, ATM is critical for controlling apoptosis in immature noncycling neural cells after DNA damage. These data demonstrate functionally distinct, but cooperative, roles for each kinase in preserving genome stability in the nervous system.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/370893-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM; ATR; DNA damage; DNA-Pkcs; genome stability; neurogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28123024      PMCID: PMC5296783          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4213-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  72 in total

1.  Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex.

Authors:  Chris Englund; Andy Fink; Charmaine Lau; Diane Pham; Ray A M Daza; Alessandro Bulfone; Tom Kowalczyk; Robert F Hevner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development.

Authors:  Robert R Buss; Woong Sun; Ronald W Oppenheim
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  A new role for ATM in selective autophagy of peroxisomes (pexophagy).

Authors:  Durga Nand Tripathi; Jiangwei Zhang; Ji Jing; Ruhee Dere; Cheryl Lyn Walker
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 16.016

4.  KAP-1 phosphorylation regulates CHD3 nucleosome remodeling during the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Aaron A Goodarzi; Thomas Kurka; Penelope A Jeggo
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 5.  ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork.

Authors:  Edward A Nam; David Cortez
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Selective utilization of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways during nervous system development.

Authors:  Kenji E Orii; Youngsoo Lee; Naomi Kondo; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Defective neurogenesis resulting from DNA ligase IV deficiency requires Atm.

Authors:  Y Lee; D E Barnes; T Lindahl; P J McKinnon
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  A critical role for DNA end-joining proteins in both lymphogenesis and neurogenesis.

Authors:  Y Gao; Y Sun; K M Frank; P Dikkes; Y Fujiwara; K J Seidl; J M Sekiguchi; G A Rathbun; W Swat; J Wang; R T Bronson; B A Malynn; M Bryans; C Zhu; J Chaudhuri; L Davidson; R Ferrini; T Stamato; S H Orkin; M E Greenberg; F W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Split-dose effect of X-irradiation on the induction of cell death in the fetal mouse brain.

Authors:  K Hoshino; Y Kameyama; M Inouye
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 10.  Beyond DNA repair: DNA-PK function in cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan F Goodwin; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 39.397

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Impact of DNA repair and stability defects on cortical development.

Authors:  Federico T Bianchi; Gaia E Berto; Ferdinando Di Cunto
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Oxidative stress and DNA damage after cerebral ischemia: Potential therapeutic targets to repair the genome and improve stroke recovery.

Authors:  Peiying Li; R Anne Stetler; Rehana K Leak; Yejie Shi; Yan Li; Weifeng Yu; Michael V L Bennett; Jun Chen
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 3.  The Connection Between Cell Fate and Telomere.

Authors:  Ayse Basak Engin; Atilla Engin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Targeting the ATM Kinase to Enhance the Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Outcomes for Cancer Patients.

Authors:  María E Guerra García; David G Kirsch; Zachary J Reitman
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 5.  Neurogenesis in aging and age-related neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Luka Culig; Xixia Chu; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 11.788

6.  Systems genetics in the rat HXB/BXH family identifies Tti2 as a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene for adult hippocampal neurogenesis and serum glucose.

Authors:  Anna N Senko; Rupert W Overall; Jan Silhavy; Petr Mlejnek; Hana Malínská; Martina Hüttl; Irena Marková; Klaus S Fabel; Lu Lu; Ales Stuchlik; Robert W Williams; Michal Pravenec; Gerd Kempermann
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.020

7.  Proximal tubule ATR regulates DNA repair to prevent maladaptive renal injury responses.

Authors:  Seiji Kishi; Craig R Brooks; Kensei Taguchi; Takaharu Ichimura; Yutaro Mori; Akinwande Akinfolarin; Navin Gupta; Pierre Galichon; Bertha C Elias; Tomohisa Suzuki; Qian Wang; Leslie Gewin; Ryuji Morizane; Joseph V Bonventre
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Increased DNA Damage and Apoptosis in CDKL5-Deficient Neurons.

Authors:  Manuela Loi; Stefania Trazzi; Claudia Fuchs; Giuseppe Galvani; Giorgio Medici; Laura Gennaccaro; Marianna Tassinari; Elisabetta Ciani
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  SMC5/6 is required for replication fork stability and faithful chromosome segregation during neurogenesis.

Authors:  Alisa Atkins; Michelle J Xu; Maggie Li; Nathaniel P Rogers; Marina V Pryzhkova; Philip W Jordan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Loss of RAD9B impairs early neural development and contributes to the risk for human spina bifida.

Authors:  Xuanye Cao; Tian Tian; John W Steele; Robert M Cabrera; Vanessa Aguiar-Pulido; Shruti Wadhwa; Nikitha Bhavani; Patrick Bi; Nick H Gargurevich; Ethan N Hoffman; Chun-Quan Cai; Nicholas J Marini; Wei Yang; Gary M Shaw; Margaret E Ross; Richard H Finnell; Yunping Lei
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.700

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.