Literature DB >> 28122871

Multicenter Evaluation of the Portrait Staph ID/R Blood Culture Panel for Rapid Identification of Staphylococci and Detection of the mecA Gene.

Gerald A Denys1, Vanessa Collazo-Velez2, Stephen Young3, Judy A Daly4, Marc Roger Couturier5,6, Matthew L Faron7,6, Blake W Buchan7,6, Nathan Ledeboer7,6.   

Abstract

Bloodstream infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and are associated with increased health care costs. We evaluated the Portrait Staph ID/R blood culture panel (BCP) multiplex PCR assay (Great Basin Scientific, Salt Lake City, UT) for the rapid and simultaneous identification (ID) of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Staphylococcus species to the genus level and the detection of the mecA gene directly from a positive blood culture bottle. A total of 765 Bactec bottles demonstrating Gram-positive cocci in singles or clusters were tested during the prospective trial at 3 clinical sites. The Portrait Staph ID/R BCP results were compared with results from conventional biochemical and cefoxitin disk methods performed at an independent laboratory. Discordant ID and mecA results were resolved by rpoB gene sequencing and mecA gene sequencing, respectively. A total of 658 Staphylococcus species isolates (S. aureus, 211 isolates; S. lugdunensis, 3 isolates; and Staphylococcus spp., 444 isolates) were recovered from monomicrobial and 33 polymicrobial blood cultures. After discrepant analysis, the overall ratios of Portrait Staph ID/R BCP positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement were 99.4%/99.9% for Staphylococcus ID and 99.7%/99.2% for mecA detection.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCR; Staphylococcus; blood culture; genotypic identification; mecA detection; rapid tests

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28122871      PMCID: PMC5377841          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02348-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Impact of rapid in situ hybridization testing on coagulase-negative staphylococci positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Graeme N Forrest; Sanjay Mehta; Elizabeth Weekes; Durry P Lincalis; Jennifer K Johnson; Richard A Venezia
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  An antimicrobial stewardship program's impact with rapid polymerase chain reaction methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus/S. aureus blood culture test in patients with S. aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Karri A Bauer; Jessica E West; Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat; Preeti Pancholi; Kurt B Stevenson; Debra A Goff
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress.

Authors:  Melvin P Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical significance of a single Staphylococcus lugdunensis-positive blood culture.

Authors:  Hind J Fadel; Robin Patel; Emily A Vetter; Larry M Baddour
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic methods for direct identification of microorganisms in positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Raquel M Martinez; Elizabeth R Bauerle; Ferric C Fang; Susan M Butler-Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Real-time PCR testing for mecA reduces vancomycin usage and length of hospitalization for patients infected with methicillin-sensitive staphylococci.

Authors:  David T Nguyen; Ellen Yeh; Sharon Perry; Robert F Luo; Benjamin A Pinsky; Betty P Lee; Deepak Sisodiya; Ellen Jo Baron; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparative effectiveness of nafcillin or cefazolin versus vancomycin in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Marin L Schweizer; Jon P Furuno; Anthony D Harris; J Kristie Johnson; Michelle D Shardell; Jessina C McGregor; Kerri A Thom; Sara E Cosgrove; George Sakoulas; Eli N Perencevich
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 8.  The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Gavin K Paterson; Ewan M Harrison; Mark A Holmes
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 17.079

9.  Sequencing and staphylococci identification.

Authors:  Alexander Mellmann; Karsten Becker; Christof von Eiff; Ursula Keckevoet; Peter Schumann; Dag Harmsen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Christine C Ginocchio; Ryhana Manii; Robert Cavagnolo; Preeti Pancholi; Lettie Swyers; Richard B Thomson; Christopher Anderson; Karen Kaul; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Performance of a Semiquantitative Multiplex Bacterial and Viral PCR Panel Compared With Standard Microbiological Laboratory Results: 396 Patients Studied With the BioFire Pneumonia Panel.

Authors:  Kenneth H Rand; Stacy G Beal; Kartikeya Cherabuddi; Brianne Couturier; Beth Lingenfelter; Cory Rindlisbacher; Jay Jones; Herbert J Houck; Kylie J Lessard; Elizabeth E Tremblay
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 3.835

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.