Literature DB >> 20071556

Real-time PCR testing for mecA reduces vancomycin usage and length of hospitalization for patients infected with methicillin-sensitive staphylococci.

David T Nguyen1, Ellen Yeh, Sharon Perry, Robert F Luo, Benjamin A Pinsky, Betty P Lee, Deepak Sisodiya, Ellen Jo Baron, Niaz Banaei.   

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have revolutionized infectious disease diagnosis, allowing for the rapid and sensitive identification of pathogens in clinical specimens. Real-time PCR testing for the mecA gene (mecA PCR), which confers methicillin resistance in staphylococci, has the added potential to reduce antibiotic usage, improve clinical outcomes, lower health care costs, and avoid emergence of drug resistance. A retrospective study was performed to identify patients infected with methicillin-sensitive staphylococcal isolates who were receiving vancomycin treatment when susceptibility results became available. Vancomycin treatment and length of hospitalization were compared in these patients for a 6-month period before and after implementation of mecA PCR. Among 65 and 94 patients identified before and after mecA PCR, respectively, vancomycin usage (measured in days on therapy) declined from a median of 3 days (range, 1 to 44 days) in the pre-PCR period to 1 day (range, 0 to 18 days) in the post-PCR period (P < 0.0001). In total, 38.5% (25/65) of patients were switched to beta-lactam therapy in the pre-PCR period, compared to 61.7% (58/94) in the post-PCR period (P = 0.004). Patient hospitalization days also declined from a median of 8 days (range, 1 to 47 days) in the pre-PCR period to 5 days (range, 0 to 42 days) in the post-PCR period (P = 0.03). Real-time PCR testing for mecA is an effective tool for reducing vancomycin usage and length of stay of hospitalized patients infected with methicillin-sensitive staphylococci. In the face of ever-rising health care expenditures in the United States, these findings have important implications for improving outcomes and decreasing costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20071556      PMCID: PMC2832423          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02150-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  34 in total

Review 1.  Staphylococcus aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Catherine Liu; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  Christof von Eiff; Georg Peters; Christine Heilmann
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Vancomycin control measures at a tertiary-care hospital: impact of interventions on volume and patterns of use.

Authors:  M V Singer; R Haft; T Barlam; M Aronson; A Shafer; K E Sands
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Bacteremia caused by staphylococci with inducible vancomycin heteroresistance.

Authors:  S S Wong; P L Ho; P C Woo; K Y Yuen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Structural basis for the beta lactam resistance of PBP2a from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Daniel Lim; Natalie C J Strynadka
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-11

6.  Effect of a vancomycin restriction policy on ordering practices during an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  A M Anglim; B Klym; K E Byers; W M Scheld; B M Farr
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-05-26

7.  The effect of vancomycin and third-generation cephalosporins on prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in 126 U.S. adult intensive care units.

Authors:  S K Fridkin; J R Edwards; J M Courval; H Hill; F C Tenover; R Lawton; R P Gaynes; J E McGowan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise-Broder; George Sakoulas; George M Eliopoulos; Jerome J Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Feng-Yee Chang; James E Peacock; Daniel M Musher; Patricia Triplett; Brent B MacDonald; Joseph M Mylotte; Alice O'Donnell; Marilyn M Wagener; Victor L Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  22 in total

1.  Clinical impact of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of staphylococcal bacteremia.

Authors:  Abigail M Frye; Catherine A Baker; D Leif Rustvold; Kim A Heath; Jessica Hunt; James E Leggett; Margret Oethinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Rapid molecular diagnostic tests in patients with bacteremia: evaluation of their impact on decision making and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  K Z Vardakas; F I Anifantaki; K K Trigkidis; M E Falagas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Performance of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture assay for direct detection of Gram-positive organisms and resistance markers in a pediatric hospital.

Authors:  Javier Mestas; Claudia M Polanco; Susanna Felsenstein; Jennifer Dien Bard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Clinical and laboratory considerations for the rapid detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Ritu Banerjee; Romney Humphries
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.882

5.  Randomized Trial of Rapid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Blood Culture Identification and Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Ritu Banerjee; Christine B Teng; Scott A Cunningham; Sherry M Ihde; James M Steckelberg; James P Moriarty; Nilay D Shah; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Individualized Approaches Are Needed for Optimized Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Ritu Banerjee; Volkan Özenci; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  A 72-h intervention for improvement of the rate of optimal antibiotic therapy in patients with bloodstream infections.

Authors:  R Murri; F Taccari; T Spanu; T D'Inzeo; I Mastrorosa; F Giovannenze; G Scoppettuolo; G Ventura; C Palazzolo; M Camici; S Lardo; B Fiori; M Sanguinetti; R Cauda; M Fantoni
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Test in a Children's Hospital Depends on Gram-Positive versus Gram-Negative Organism and Day versus Night Shift.

Authors:  Lillian J Juttukonda; Sophie Katz; Jessica Gillon; Jonathon Schmitz; Ritu Banerjee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of the nanosphere verigene gram-positive blood culture assay with the VersaTREK blood culture system and assessment of possible impact on selected patients.

Authors:  Stacy G Beal; Jane Ciurca; Geremy Smith; Jeffrey John; Francesca Lee; Christopher D Doern; Rita M Gander
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture nucleic acid test for rapid detection of bacteria and resistance determinants.

Authors:  Christina M Wojewoda; Linda Sercia; Maria Navas; Marion Tuohy; Deborah Wilson; Geraldine S Hall; Gary W Procop; Sandra S Richter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.