Literature DB >> 28121875

Advanced Imaging Techniques for Investigation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Biointegration.

Brent R DeGeorge1, Bo Ning, Lisa S Salopek, Angela Pineros-Fernandez, George T Rodeheaver, Shayn Peirce-Cottler, Song Hu, Patrick S Cottler, Christopher A Campbell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biointegration, a concept involving a dynamic interplay among three processes-inflammation, cellular infiltration, and angiogenesis-is key to understanding the interaction between acellular dermal matrices and the host. The current standard for evaluating acellular dermal matrix biointegration involves histologic analysis at fixed time points; however, the authors' approach uses advanced imaging techniques to serially assess biointegration in real time.
METHODS: The authors have adapted two advanced imaging techniques-two-photon microscopy and photoacoustic microscopy-to investigate biointegration in a murine deepithelialized dorsal skin-fold window chamber model, specifically engineered to recapitulate the host microenvironment of acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Four mice per group were assessed. Two-photon imaging of dual-transgenic mice allows for detection of fluorescently labeled perivascular cells, and macrophage lineage cells. Photoacoustic microscopy noninvasively assesses oxygen and hemoglobin concentration in living tissues, generating high-resolution, three-dimensional mapping of the nascent acellular dermal matrix-associated microvasculature and metabolic consumption of oxygen. These outcomes were corroborated by confirmatory histologic analysis at the terminal time point.
RESULTS: The acellular dermal matrix/host interface is characterized by robust inflammation (0 to 3 days), increased oxygen consumption and neoangiogenesis in the matrix border zone (10 to 14 days), and vascular and inflammatory cell penetration into the center of the matrix (>21 days).
CONCLUSION: The data broaden the core knowledge of acellular dermal matrix biology, and serve as a potential template for elucidating the key differences among various commercially available and developmental products to guide the reconstructive surgeon to better select a reconstructive adjunct that meets their specific needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28121875     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Immunomodulation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Through Interleukin 4 Enhances Vascular Infiltration.

Authors:  Patrick S Cottler; Hannah Kang; Victoria Nash; Lisa Salopek; Anthony C Bruce; Kara L Spiller; Chris A Campbell
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction and Red Breast Syndrome: Demystification and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-23

3.  Rabbit as an animal model for the study of biological grafts in pelvic floor dysfunctions.

Authors:  Marta Peró; Laura Casani; Cristina Castells-Sala; Maria Luisa Pérez; Esther Moga Naranjo; Oriol Juan-Babot; Leticia Alserawan De Lamo; Patricia López-Chicón; Anna Vilarrodona Serrat; Lina Badimon; Oriol Porta Roda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Clinical observation on healing of tarsal plate defect after reconstruction with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix.

Authors:  Qin Huang; Hongfei Liao; Yangbin Fang; Yaohua Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  A Histological Comparison of Two Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Products in Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hunter R Moyer; Alexandra M Hart; Jessica Yeager; Albert Losken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-12-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.