Literature DB >> 34006889

Rabbit as an animal model for the study of biological grafts in pelvic floor dysfunctions.

Marta Peró1, Laura Casani2, Cristina Castells-Sala3,4, Maria Luisa Pérez3,4, Esther Moga Naranjo5, Oriol Juan-Babot2, Leticia Alserawan De Lamo5, Patricia López-Chicón3,4, Anna Vilarrodona Serrat3,4, Lina Badimon2, Oriol Porta Roda6.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of the New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit for studying implanted biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery; and to compare the occurrence of graft-related complications of a commercial polypropylene (PP) mesh and new developed human dermal matrix implanted at vaginal and abdominal level. 20 white female NZW rabbits were randomized into two groups, experimental group (human acellular dermal matrices-hADM-graft) and control group (commercial PP graft). In each animal, grafts were surgically implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal wall and in the vaginal submucosa layer for 180 days. The graft segments were then removed and the surgical and clinical results were analyzed. The main surgical challenges during graft implantation were: (a) an adequate vaginal exposure while maintaining the integrity of the vaginal mucosa layer; (b) to keep aseptic conditions; (c) to locate and dissect the breast vein abdominal surgery; and (d) to withdraw blood samples from the ear artery. The most abnormal findings during the explant surgery were found in the PP group (33% of vaginal mesh extrusion) in comparison with the hADM group (0% of vaginal graft extrusion), p = 0.015. Interestingly, macroscopic observation showed that the integration of the vaginal grafts was more common in the hADM group (40%) than in the PP group, in which the vaginal mesh was identified in 100% of the animals (p = 0.014). The NZW rabbit is a good model for assessing materials to be used as grafts for pelvic reconstructive surgery and vaginal surgery. Animals are easily managed during the procedures, including surgical intervention and vaginal mucosa approach. Additionally, hADM is associated with fewer clinical complications, as well as better macroscopic tissue integration, compared to PP mesh.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34006889     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89698-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  35 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a decellularized membrane from human dermis.

Authors:  Elena Bondioli; Milena Fini; Francesca Veronesi; Gianluca Giavaresi; Matilde Tschon; Giovanna Cenacchi; Serenella Cerasoli; Roberto Giardino; Davide Melandri
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 2.  Reprint of: Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Donald O Freytes; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 3.  Vaginal Mesh in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: Controversies, Current Use, and Complications.

Authors:  Cecile A Unger; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm).

Authors:  C Andrew Salzberg; Andrew Y Ashikari; R Michael Koch; Elizabeth Chabner-Thompson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Effective decellularization of human nerve matrix for regenerative medicine with a novel protocol.

Authors:  N Nieto-Nicolau; P López-Chicón; O Fariñas; S Bolívar; E Udina; X Navarro; R P Casaroli-Marano; A Vilarrodona
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AND FAECAL INCONTINENCE.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Karl-Erik Andersson; Apostolos Apostolidis; Lori Birder; Donna Bliss; Linda Brubaker; Linda Cardozo; David Castro-Diaz; P R O'Connell; Alan Cottenden; Nikki Cotterill; Dirk de Ridder; Roger Dmochowski; Chantal Dumoulin; Mandy Fader; Christopher Fry; Howard Goldman; Philip Hanno; Yukio Homma; Vik Khullar; Chris Maher; Ian Milsom; Diane Newman; Rien J M Nijman; Kevin Rademakers; Dudley Robinson; Peter Rosier; Eric Rovner; Stefano Salvatore; Masayuki Takeda; Adrian Wagg; Todd Wagner; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Katie E Weichman; Stelios C Wilson; Andrew L Weinstein; Alexes Hazen; Jamie P Levine; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of acellular dermal matrix in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoshuang Guo; Dali Mu; Fuqiang Gao
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Ventral hernia repair using allogenic acellular dermal matrix in a swine model.

Authors:  R P Silverman; E N Li; L H Holton; K T Sawan; N H Goldberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Long-term followup of dermal substitution with acellular dermal implant in burns and postburn scar corrections.

Authors:  I Juhasz; B Kiss; L Lukacs; I Erdei; Z Peter; E Remenyik
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2010-12-30
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Application of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Gynaecology-A Current Review.

Authors:  Kaja Skowronek; Wojciech Łabuś; Rafał Stojko; Diana Kitala; Marcin Sadłocha; Agnieszka Drosdzol-Cop
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.