John W Liang1,2, Laura Stein1, Natalie Wilson1, Johanna T Fifi1,3, Stanley Tuhrim1, Mandip S Dhamoon1. 1. Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, Divisions of Cerebrovascular Disease, Critical Care and Neurotrauma, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Access to endovascular therapy (ET) in cases of acute ischemic stroke may be limited, and rapid transfer of eligible patients to hospitals with endovascular capability is needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of diagnostic CT angiography to confirm large vessel occlusion (LVO). METHODS: Of 57 emergency department transfers to Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) for possible ET from January 2015 through March 2016, 39 (68%) underwent ET, among whom 22 (56%) had CT angiography before transfer and 17 (44%) had CT angiography on arrival. We compared mean outside hospital arrival to groin puncture (OTG) time between the two groups using t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. OTG was defined as the difference between groin puncture and outside hospital arrival time minus ambulance travel time. RESULTS: Average age was 73±13 years and average National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 19±5. There was no difference in average OTG time between the two groups (191 min for CT angiography at outside hospital vs 190 min for CT angiography at MSH (p=0.99 for t-test and 0.69 for rank sum test)). Among the 18 patients who were transferred but did not receive ET, 10 had no LVO, 5 had large established infarcts on arrival and 3 had post-tissue plasminogen activator hemorrhage. In 9/10 patients without LVO, CT angiography was not performed before transfer. CONCLUSIONS: CT angiography timing in the transfer process does not affect OTG time, but 90% of patients without LVO had not had CT angiography before transfer. Hence, it might be beneficial to obtain a CT angiogram at the outside hospital, if it can be acquired and read rapidly, to avoid the cost and potential clinical deterioration associated with unnecessary transfers. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Access to endovascular therapy (ET) in cases of acute ischemic stroke may be limited, and rapid transfer of eligible patients to hospitals with endovascular capability is needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of diagnostic CT angiography to confirm large vessel occlusion (LVO). METHODS: Of 57 emergency department transfers to Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) for possible ET from January 2015 through March 2016, 39 (68%) underwent ET, among whom 22 (56%) had CT angiography before transfer and 17 (44%) had CT angiography on arrival. We compared mean outside hospital arrival to groin puncture (OTG) time between the two groups using t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. OTG was defined as the difference between groin puncture and outside hospital arrival time minus ambulance travel time. RESULTS: Average age was 73±13 years and average National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 19±5. There was no difference in average OTG time between the two groups (191 min for CT angiography at outside hospital vs 190 min for CT angiography at MSH (p=0.99 for t-test and 0.69 for rank sum test)). Among the 18 patients who were transferred but did not receive ET, 10 had no LVO, 5 had large established infarcts on arrival and 3 had post-tissue plasminogen activator hemorrhage. In 9/10 patients without LVO, CT angiography was not performed before transfer. CONCLUSIONS: CT angiography timing in the transfer process does not affect OTG time, but 90% of patients without LVO had not had CT angiography before transfer. Hence, it might be beneficial to obtain a CT angiogram at the outside hospital, if it can be acquired and read rapidly, to avoid the cost and potential clinical deterioration associated with unnecessary transfers. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Y Mayasi; R P Goddeau; M Moonis; B Silver; A H Jun-O'Connell; A S Puri; N Henninger Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ryan A McTaggart; Shadi Yaghi; Shawna M Cutting; Morgan Hemendinger; Grayson L Baird; Richard A Haas; Karen L Furie; Mahesh V Jayaraman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Ying Xian; Shubin Sheng; Kori S Zachrison; Jeffrey L Saver; Kevin N Sheth; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregoire Boulouis; Arne Lauer; Ahmer Khawdja Siddiqui; Andreas Charidimou; Robert W Regenhardt; Anand Viswanathan; Natalia Rost; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Lee H Schwamm Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Laura C C van Meenen; Sanne J den Hartog; Adrien E Groot; Bart J Emmer; Martin D Smeekes; Arjen Siegers; Geert Jan Kommer; Charles B L M Majoie; Yvo B W E M Roos; Adriaan C G M van Es; Diederik W Dippel; H Bart van der Worp; Hester F Lingsma; Bob Roozenbeek; Jonathan M Coutinho Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 6.288