Debarun Dutta1, Timothy Zhao2, Kai Bing Cheah2, Larke Holmlund3, Mark D P Willcox2. 1. School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: debarun.dutta@unsw.edu.au. 2. School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Australia. 3. Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the antimicrobial activity of the melimine derived peptide Mel4 against Delftia, Stenotrophomonas, Elizabethkingia, Burkholderia and to investigate biocompatibility of Mel4 as an antimicrobial coating on contact lenses in animals and humans. METHODS: In vitro antimicrobial activity of Mel4 was determined against the four Gram negative bacteria by investigating growth curves for 24h followed by viable counts to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Contact lenses were coated by covalently binding Mel4, characterized by amino acid analysis, and were investigated for changes in lens parameters. Safety of Mel-4 coated lenses were determined in a rabbit model of daily contralateral wear. A prospective, randomised, double-masked, contralateral, 1week daily wear human clinical trial was used to evaluate subjective responses and ocular physiology. RESULTS: Mel4 was active against all the bacteria tested (MIC50 ranged from 31-1000μgml-1) and produced an antimicrobial surface on contact lenses. Mel4-coating resulted hydrophilic surface without any significant change in contact lens parameters, and showed no signs of cytotoxicity or ocular irritation during rabbit wear. During human clinical trial, there were no differences between Mel4 coated and uncoated contact lenses in lens performance indicators and ocular signs such as corneal fluorescein staining. Mel4 and control uncoated lenses had no differences in ocular symptoms during lens wear. CONCLUSION: Mel4 has achieved antimicrobial activity against variety of Gram negative bacteria that are often resistant to the action of cationic peptides and have been implicated in contact lens related adverse events. Mel4-coated contact lenses were safe to wear.
PURPOSE: To determine the antimicrobial activity of the melimine derived peptide Mel4 against Delftia, Stenotrophomonas, Elizabethkingia, Burkholderia and to investigate biocompatibility of Mel4 as an antimicrobial coating on contact lenses in animals and humans. METHODS: In vitro antimicrobial activity of Mel4 was determined against the four Gram negative bacteria by investigating growth curves for 24h followed by viable counts to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Contact lenses were coated by covalently binding Mel4, characterized by amino acid analysis, and were investigated for changes in lens parameters. Safety of Mel-4 coated lenses were determined in a rabbit model of daily contralateral wear. A prospective, randomised, double-masked, contralateral, 1week daily wear human clinical trial was used to evaluate subjective responses and ocular physiology. RESULTS: Mel4 was active against all the bacteria tested (MIC50 ranged from 31-1000μgml-1) and produced an antimicrobial surface on contact lenses. Mel4-coating resulted hydrophilic surface without any significant change in contact lens parameters, and showed no signs of cytotoxicity or ocular irritation during rabbit wear. During human clinical trial, there were no differences between Mel4 coated and uncoated contact lenses in lens performance indicators and ocular signs such as cornealfluorescein staining. Mel4 and control uncoated lenses had no differences in ocular symptoms during lens wear. CONCLUSION: Mel4 has achieved antimicrobial activity against variety of Gram negative bacteria that are often resistant to the action of cationic peptides and have been implicated in contact lens related adverse events. Mel4-coated contact lenses were safe to wear.
Authors: Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Joseph P Shovlin; Cristina M Schnider; Barbara E Caffery; Eduardo C Alfonso; Nicole A Carnt; Robin L Chalmers; Sarah Collier; Deborah S Jacobs; Charlotte E Joslin; Abby R Kroken; Carol Lakkis; Eric Pearlman; Oliver D Schein; Fiona Stapleton; Elmer Tu; Mark D P Willcox Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Muhammad Yasir; Debarun Dutta; Khondker R Hossain; Renxun Chen; Kitty K K Ho; Rajesh Kuppusamy; Ronald J Clarke; Naresh Kumar; Mark D P Willcox Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Imran Mohammed; Rajamani Lakshminarayanan; Roger W Beuerman; Harminder S Dua Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Imran Mohammed; Harminder S Dua; Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Eunice Tze Leng Goh; Venkatesh Mayandi; Joanna M F Busoy; Thet Tun Aung; Mercy Halleluyah Periayah; Mario Nubile; Leonardo Mastropasqua; Dalia G Said; Hla M Htoon; Veluchamy Amutha Barathi; Roger W Beuerman; Rajamani Lakshminarayanan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Katrina Browne; Rajesh Kuppusamy; Renxun Chen; Mark D P Willcox; William R Walsh; David StC Black; Naresh Kumar Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 5.923