| Literature DB >> 28117755 |
Qi-Bin Cheng1,2, Li-Wei Zhang3.
Abstract
Daidzein, which is scarce in nature, has gained significant attention due to its superior biological activity and bioavailability compared with daidzin. So far, it has been widely used in the medicine and health care products industries. The enzymatic approach for the preparation of daidzein has prevailed, benefitted by its high efficiency and eco-friendly nature. Our present research aimed at providing a preparation method of daidzein by enzymatic hydrolysis of daidzin in a new "green" reaction medium-deep eutectic solvents (DESs). Herein, the DESs were screened via evaluating enzyme activity, enzyme stability and the substrate solubility, and the DES (ChCl/EG 2:1, 30 vol %) was believed to be the most appropriate co-solvent to improve the bioconversion efficiency. Based on the yield of daidzein, response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to model and optimize the reaction parameters. Under these optimum process conditions, the maximum yield of 97.53% was achieved and the purity of daidzein crude product reached more than 70%, which is more efficient than conversions in DESs-free buffer. Importantly, it has been shown that DESs medium could be reused for six batches of the process with a final conversion of above 50%. The results indicated that this procedure could be considered a mild, environmentally friendly, highly efficient approach to the economical production of daidzein, with a simple operation process and without any harmful reagents being involved.Entities:
Keywords: daidzein; deep eutectic solvents; enzymatic hydrolysis; optimization; response surface methodology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28117755 PMCID: PMC6155624 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22010186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Activity and thermal-stability of β-d-glucosidase in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.8) containing different DESs (20 vol %). The relative activities (%) refer to the percentages of the initial reaction rates obtained by the enzyme in the deep eutectic solvents (DES)-containing aqueous solutions relative to the one obtained in the pure buffer. The half-life (min) of the enzyme were obtained at 65 °C.
Figure 2Variation of β-d-glucosidase activity (A) and half-life (B) in the four typical DESs (ChCl/G 2:1; ChCl/G 1:2; ChCl/EG 2:1 and ChCl/Glu 2:1) with different concentration. The half-life (min) of the enzyme were obtained at 65 °C.
Figure 3Effect of temperature (°C) (A) and pH value (B) on the activity of β-d-glucosidase in the four typical DESs (ChCl/G 2:1; ChCl/G 1:2; ChCl/EG 2:1 and ChCl/Glu 2:1).
Figure 4The equilibrium solubility of daidzin in the four typical DESs (ChCl/G 2:1; ChCl/G 1:2; ChCl/EG 2:1 and ChCl/Glu 2:1) at different temperatures (°C).
Variables in Box-Behnken design for the preparation of daidzein.
| Factors | Actual and Coded Levels Used for the Conditions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Low (−1) | Medium (0) | High (+1) | |
| A = Reaction time (min) | 30 | 90 | 150 |
| B = Temperature (°C) | 45 | 55 | 65 |
| C = pH value | 3.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| D = Enzyme loading (U) | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| Dependent variable (response) | Constrains | ||
| R = Conversion yield (%) | Maximize | ||
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the quadratic polynomial model for level optimization of enzymatic preparation of daidzein.
| Source | Sum of Square | df | Mean Square | Significance Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 26,090.77 | 14 | 1863.63 | 62.75 | <0.0001 | Sig |
| A-RT | 1184.05 | 1 | 1184.05 | 39.87 | <0.0001 | |
| B-Temp | 3717.12 | 1 | 3717.12 | 125.15 | <0.0001 | |
| C-pH | 7405.3 | 1 | 7405.3 | 249.32 | <0.0001 | |
| D-EL | 2745.19 | 1 | 2745.19 | 92.43 | <0.0001 | |
| AB | 0.16 | 1 | 0.16 | 0.005387 | 0.9425 | |
| AC | 51.12 | 1 | 51.12 | 1.72 | 0.2106 | |
| AD | 0.56 | 1 | 0.56 | 0.019 | 0.8925 | |
| BC | 481.8 | 1 | 481.8 | 16.22 | 0.0012 | |
| BD | 10.56 | 1 | 10.56 | 0.36 | 0.5605 | |
| CD | 128.82 | 1 | 128.82 | 4.34 | 0.0561 | |
| A2 | 541.98 | 1 | 541.98 | 18.25 | 0.0008 | |
| B2 | 1769.34 | 1 | 1769.34 | 59.57 | <0.0001 | |
| C2 | 9754.11 | 1 | 9754.11 | 328.4 | <0.0001 | |
| D2 | 836.1 | 1 | 836.1 | 28.15 | <0.0001 | |
| Residual | 415.82 | 14 | 29.7 | |||
| Lack of fit | 342.65 | 10 | 34.26 | 1.87 | 0.2858 | Not Sig |
| Pure Error | 73.17 | 4 | 18.29 | |||
| Cor Total | 26,506.59 | 28 | ||||
| 0.9843 | ||||||
| Adj | 0.9686 | |||||
| C.V. % | 9.74 | |||||
| Adj precision | 23.789 |
Figure 5Response surface 3D plots showing the effect of (A) reaction time and temperature; (B) reaction time and system pH; (C) reaction time and enzyme loading; (D) temperature and system pH; (E) system pH and enzyme loading; (F) temperature and enzyme loading on the conversion yield of daidzein.
Figure 6The medium reusability of recycling times (A) and the hydrolysis efficiency by using different ways to prepare daidzein (B).