| Literature DB >> 28117669 |
Mirza Hasanuzzaman1,2, Kamrun Nahar3,4, Md Shahadat Hossain5, Jubayer Al Mahmud6,7, Anisur Rahman8,9, Masashi Inafuku10, Hirosuke Oku11, Masayuki Fujita12.
Abstract
Being sessile organisms, plants are frequently exposed to various environmental stresses that cause several physiological disorders and even death. Oxidative stress is one of the common consequences of abiotic stress in plants, which is caused by excess generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Sometimes ROS production exceeds the capacity of antioxidant defense systems, which leads to oxidative stress. In line with ROS, plants also produce a high amount of methylglyoxal (MG), which is an α-oxoaldehyde compound, highly reactive, cytotoxic, and produced via different enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions. This MG can impair cells or cell components and can even destroy DNA or cause mutation. Under stress conditions, MG concentration in plants can be increased 2- to 6-fold compared with normal conditions depending on the plant species. However, plants have a system developed to detoxify this MG consisting of two major enzymes: glyoxalase I (Gly I) and glyoxalase II (Gly II), and hence known as the glyoxalase system. Recently, a novel glyoxalase enzyme, named glyoxalase III (Gly III), has been detected in plants, providing a shorter pathway for MG detoxification, which is also a signpost in the research of abiotic stress tolerance. Glutathione (GSH) acts as a co-factor for this system. Therefore, this system not only detoxifies MG but also plays a role in maintaining GSH homeostasis and subsequent ROS detoxification. Upregulation of both Gly I and Gly II as well as their overexpression in plant species showed enhanced tolerance to various abiotic stresses including salinity, drought, metal toxicity, and extreme temperature. In the past few decades, a considerable amount of reports have indicated that both antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems have strong interactions in conferring abiotic stress tolerance in plants through the detoxification of ROS and MG. In this review, we will focus on the mechanisms of these interactions and the coordinated action of these systems towards stress tolerance.Entities:
Keywords: abiotic stress; antioxidant defense; glutathione; methylglyoxal; oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28117669 PMCID: PMC5297830 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18010200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Generation of oxidative stress due to the consequences of abiotic stress (ROS, reactive oxygen species; 1O2, singlet oxygen; O2•−, superoxide anion; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; OH•, hydroxyl radical; MG, methylglyoxal; AOX, antioxidants).
Figure 2Methylglyoxal biosynthesis, damaging effects, and its detoxification through the glyoxalase system (modified from Kalapos [56] and Kaur et al. [48]) (G-6P, glucose 6-phosphate; F-6P, fructose 6-phosphate; F-1,6P2, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; GA-3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone-phosphate; GSH, glutathione; Gly I, Glyoxalase I; Gly II, Glyoxalase II; Gly III, Glyoxalase III; AGEs, advanced glycation end products).
Figure 3Coordinated actions of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems in eliminating the toxic ROS and MG under abiotic stress. Dotted lines denote non-enzymatic conversions. R may be an aliphatic, aromatic, or heterocyclic group; X may be a sulfate, nitrite, or halide group. (Ascorbic acid, AsA; glutathione, GSH; glutathione dissulfide, GSSG; superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; MDHA, monodehydroascorbate; monodehydroascorbate reductase, MDHAR; DHA, dehydroascorbate; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; glutathione reductase, GR; glutathione peroxidase, GPX; glutathione S-transferase, GST; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; Gly I, glyoxalase I; Gly II, glyoxalase II; SLG, S-D-lactoylglutathione). (Adapted from Hasanuzzaman et al. [4].) Solid arrows indicate enzymatic reactions while dotted arrows indicate non-enzymatic reactions.
Regulation of the glyoxalase system and associated antioxidant defense system in plants under salt stress.
| Plant Species | Stress (Dose and Duration) | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems | Protectants | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems after Protection | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 300 mM NaCl, 24 and 48 h | Increased Gly I activity Gly II activity increased to 1.5- and 1.2-fold after 24 and 48 h, respectively MDA and H2O2 content increased GSH and GSSG contents increased Increased GPX and GST activities | 15 mM Pro, 15 mM GB | Further increase in Gly I activity by 12% and 17% after 24 and 48 h, respectively Further increase- of Gly II activity Increased GSH content Increased GPX, GST and GR activities Decreased MDA and H2O2 contents | [ | |
| 150 mM NaCl, 48 h | Increased Gly I activity Gly II activity decreased by 18% Increased AsA and GSH contents Increased MDA and H2O2 contents Upregulated APX, MDHAR, DHAR and GR activities | Heat shock (42 °C), 5 h | Further increase in Gly I activity by 19% Increased Gly II activity by 22% Further increase in AsA and GSH levels and activities of APX, DHAR, GR and GPX | [ | |
| 100 and 200 mM NaCl, 48 h | Decreased Gly I activity by 21% and 33% with 100 and 200 mM NaCl, respectively Decreased Gly II activity by 30% and 37% with 100 and 200 mM NaCl, respectively Decreased AsA content Increased GSH and GSSG contents Increased production of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation Increased APX and GR activities Decreased MDHAR, DHAR and CAT activities | 100 μM SA | Increased Gly I activity Gly II activity increased further by 31% and 37% with 100 and 200 mM NaCl, respectively Decreased ROS production and lipid peroxidation Further increase in ASA and GSH contents Upregulated APX, MDHAR, DHAR, GR and CAT activities | [ | |
| 150 and 300 mM NaCl, 4 days | Gly I activity decreased by 12% and 26% with 150 and 300 mM NaCl, respectively Decreased Gly II activity Decreased AsA content Increased GSH and GSSG contents Increased ROS production and lipid peroxidation with increasing salinity | 1 mM sodium nitroprusside (SNP), 24 h pretreatment | Gly I activity further increased by 26% and 25% with 150 and 300 mM NaCl, respectively Increased Gly II activity Decreased ROS production and lipid peroxidation Increased ASA and GSH contents Increased MDHAR, DHAR and GR activities | [ | |
| 150 and 300 mM NaCl | Gly I activity decreased in sensitive cultivar and increased in tolerant cultivar Decreased chlorophyll (chl) content Increased H2O2 production and lipid peroxidation Increased Pro content | 5 mM Pro and 5 mM GB | Increased Gly I and Gly II activities Increased chl content Decreased ROS production and lipid peroxidation Upregulated non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants | [ | |
| 150 and 250 mM NaCl, 72 h | Increased Gly I and Gly II activities with increasing salt stress Increased ROS production and MDA content Decreased AsA content and increased GSH content Increased SOD, GPX, APX, DHAR and GR activities Decreased CAT and GST activities | 10 mM Trehalose (Tre) | Further increase in Gly I activity Further increase in Gly II activity Increased SOD, CAT, MDHAR, DHAR and GR activities Decreased ROS production, lipid peroxidation lipoxygenase (LOX) activity and MDA content | [ | |
| 150 mM NaCl, 4 days | Increased MG content by 58% Gly I activity increased by 12% Decreased chl content Increased ROS production Increased lipid peroxidation | 50 μM H2S | Decreased MG content Increased Gly I and Gly II activities Increased chl content Decreased Pro content Decreased ROS production and lipid peroxidation | [ | |
| 200 mM NaCl, 3 days | Increased MG content by 44% Increased Gly I and Gly II activities by 21% and 29%, respectively Increased ROS (H2O2, O2•−) production and lipid peroxidation (MDA content, LOX activity) Decreased AsA content and increased GSH content | 2 mM CaCl2 | Decreased MG content Further increased Gly I and Gly II activities by 24% and 20% respectively Increased ROS and MG detoxification | [ | |
| 150 mM NaCl, 3 and 6 days | Increased MG content with increasing stress duration Increased Gly I and Gly II activities with increasing stress duration Increased ROS production Increased MDA content Decreased AsA content and increased DHA, GSH and GSSG contents | 0.5 mM MnSO4 | Decreased MG content Further increased Gly I and Gly II activities Increased ROS and MG detoxification Increased chl content Decreased osmotic stress (decreased Pro content, osmotic potential) | [ |
Regulation of the glyoxalase system and associated antioxidant defense system in plants under drought stress.
| Plant Species | Stress (Dose and Duration) | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems | Protectants | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems after Protection | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% PEG-6000, 48 h | Increased MG Increased Gly I activity but decreased Gly II activity Increased GSSG content, and ratio of GSH/GSSG Increased ROS generation and oxidative damage | 0.2 mM Spermidine (Spd) | Increased Gly II activity Increased GSH and GSSG contents Reduced MG level Reduced ROS production including H2O2 and O2•− as well as lipid peroxidation | [ | |
| 25% PEG-6000, 24 and 48 h | Increased MG content Decreased activity of Gly II Increased H2O2 and O2•− contents and lipid peroxidation | 1 mM GSH | Increased activities of Gly I and Gly II Decreased MG content Decreased H2O2 and O2•− contents and lipid peroxidation | [ | |
| Water deficit stress | Upregulation of Gly I activity Increased MG content | - | - | [ | |
| Water deficit stress created by mannitol | Tomato (encoding gene for Gly I) upregulated Gly I activity by 2–3-fold in all cell types of roots, stems, and leaves especially in phloem sieve elements | - | - | [ | |
| 10% and 20% PEG-6000, 48 h | Gly I activity increased but Gly II activity decreased The content of GSH and GSSG increased, GSH/GSSG ratio decreased H2O2 and MDA contents increased | 25 μM Na2SeO4 | Increased activities of Gly I, and Gly II Increase in GSH content and GSH/GSSG ratio Reduction of ROS generation and oxidative damage | [ | |
| Desiccation, 8 h | Overexpression of OsDJ-1C increased Gly III activity, decreased MG content, increased formation of | - | - | [ |
Regulation of the glyoxalase system and the associated antioxidant defense system in plants exposed to toxic metals/metalloids.
| Plant Species | Stress (Dose and Duration) | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems | Protectants | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems after Protection | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 mM CdCl2, 48 h | Slightly increased activity of Gly I Decreased Gly II activity Higher accumulation of MG | 5 mM Pro or GB, 48 h | Further increase in Gly I activity Increased Gly II activity Lower oxidative damage due to higher MG detoxification | [ | |
| 0.5 and 1.0 mM CdCl2, 48 h | Gly I activity decreased by 18% and 35% at 0.5 and 1.0 mM CdCl2, respectively Gly II activity decreased by 20% and 32% at 0.5 and 1.0 mM CdCl2, respectively | Seed pretreatment; 50 and 100 μM Na2SeO4, 24 h | Further increase in Gly I activity Gly II activity increased | [ | |
| 0.25 and 0.5 mM Na2HAsO4·7H2O, 72 h | Decreased Gly I activity by 34% and 44% at 0.25 and 0.5 mM of As, respectively Decreased Gly II activity by 29% only upon 0.5 mM As Insufficient MG detoxification | 0.25 mM SNP, 72 h | Increased Gly I and Gly II activities Efficient MG detoxification | [ | |
| 150 µM CuSO4, 48 h | Enhanced Gly I activity Gly II activity increased by 24% in leaves and 30% in roots | Pretratment, 100 µM SA, 24 h | Further enhancement of Gly I activities in roots and leaves Enhanced Gly II activities by 50% in roots but remain statistically similar in leaves | [ | |
| 100 μM CuSO4, 48 h | Increased Gly I and Gly II activities | 200 μM SNP or 200 μM GSH, 48 h | Decreased Gly I and Gly II activities Increased GSH content | [ | |
| 100 µM CuSO4, 4 and 7 days | Gly I activity increased by 22% after 4 days stress and decreased by 25% after 7 days stress Gly II activity increased by 47% after 4 days stress, but the activity returned to the level in control after Day 7 Increased MG level by 106% and 156% after 4 and 7 days stress, respectively | Pretreatment, 10 mM Tre, 48 h | Gly I activity increased at both days of Cu stress Gly II activity did not increase significantly at Day 4, but increased significantly at Day 7 Decreased MG level by 27% and 35% at 4 and 7 days stress, respectively | [ | |
| 0.5 and 1 mM Na2HAsO4, 5 days | Decrease in Gly I activity by 9% and 17% at 0.5 and 1 mM As, respectively Increased Gly II activity MG content increased with dose-dependent manner | 10 mM CaCl2 | Higher Gly I activity Increased Gly II activity by 23% and 31% at 0.5 and 1 mM As treated seedlings MG content decreased by 22% and 25% at 0.5 and 1 mM As treated rice seedlings, respectively | [ | |
| 0.25 and 0.5 mM CdCl2, 72 h | Reduced Gly I activity Declined Gly II activity Increased MG content with dose-dependent manner | 2.5 mM CaCl2, 72 h | Increased Gly I activity by 35% and 31% at 0.25 and 0.5 mM CdCl2, respectively Increased Gly II activity by 23% and 53% with 0.25 and 0.5 mM CdCl2, respectively Decreased MG content by 31% and 24% at 0.25 and 0.5 mM CdCl2, respectively | [ | |
| 0.3 mM CdCl2, 72 h | Increased Gly I activity Decreased Gly II activity Increased MG content | 0.3 mM MnSO4, 72 h | Decreased the MG content Increased the Gly I activity Further increase in Gly II activity | [ | |
| 1.5 mM CdCl2, 48 h | Increased Gly I activity Decreased Gly II activity Increased MG production by 132% | Pretreatment, 0.2 mM Put and 1 mM SNP, 24 h | Increased Gly II activity Decreased MG content | [ | |
| CdCl2, 1.0 and 1.5 mM | Increased Gly I activity Decreased Gly II activity Increased MG content by 77% and 177% under 1.0 and 1.5 mM CdCl2, respectively | Pretreatment, 0.25 mM Spm, 24 h | Slight increase in Gly I activity Markedly increased Gly II activity Reduced MG content | [ |
Regulation of the glyoxalase system and associated antioxidant defense system in plants under temperature stress.
| Plant Species | Extent of Temperature Stress | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems | Protectants | Changes in Glyoxalase and Antioxidant Defense Systems after Protection | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 and 40 °C, 48 h | Increased MG content and Gly II activity but decreased Gly I activity | 0.25 µM 24-epibrassinolide (EBR) | Increased activities of Gly I and Gly II Decreased the levels of ROS, MDA and MG | [ | |
| 45 °C, 15–120 min | Overexpression of | - | - | [ | |
| 42 °C, 8 h | Overexpressing | - | - | [ | |
| 40 °C, 2 days | Overproduction of MG Increased Gly I activity, decreased Gly II activity Increased GSH content, decreased GSH/GSSG ratio, increased H2O2 and O2•− generation | Spermine (Spm, 0.2 mM) | Reduced MG content Increased Gly I and Gly II activities Increased GSH content and GSH/GSSG ratio Decreased H2O2 and O2•− production | [ | |
| 38 °C, 24 and 48 h | Increased Gly I and Gly II activities Increased GSH and GSSG contents but decreased GSH/GSSG ratio, increased H2O2 content and lipid peroxidation | 0.5 mM SNP | Increased Gly I activity Increased GSH level as well as the GSH/GSSG ratio Decreased H2O2 content and lipid peroxidation | [ | |
| 6 °C, 2 and 3 days | Increased MG content, H2O2 content and lipid peroxidation Decreased Gly II activity | 0.25 mM Spd | Reduced oxidative stress induced by both MG and ROS decreased GSSG and increased GSH content and GSH/GSSG ratio | [ | |
| 4 °C, 8 h | Overexpression of Decrease in MG content, increased formation of | - | - | [ | |
| 4 °C, 15 min–2 h | Overexpression of | - | - | [ |
Figure 4MG signaling pathways in plants (Modified from Hoque et al. [49] and Kaur et al. [40,41]) (ROSext, extracellular ROS; ROSint, Intracellular ROS; [Ca2+]cyt, cytosolic Ca2+).
Genetic modifications of glyoxalase genes and their role in conferring abiotic stress tolerance.
| Transgenic Plant | Gene | Gene Sources | Tolerance Response in Transgenic Plant | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Improved tolerance to MG, salt, mannitol and H2O2 stresses Improved chl content and growth, compared to control under the abiotic stress conditions | [ | |||
Both Gly I and Gly II were overexpressed, which enhanced zinc tolerance Improved chl content, reduced yellowing, and improved phenotype | [ | |||
Increased levels of Gly I, decreased metal accumulation and improved root growth under zinc stress Transgenics also showed similar tolerance response to Cd and Pb | [ | |||
Activity of Gly I increased in transgenic plants showed higher tolerance to MG and high salt | [ | |||
Increased Gly III activity, decreased MG content under desiccation stress | [ | |||
Overexpression of Increased formation of | [ | |||
Reduced plant yellowing and leaf burn symptom Increased root, shoot and plant dry weight, and reduced accumulation of Na+ and Cl− ion, compared to wild type | [ | |||
Salinity, HM stress, and ABA upregulated the activity of Gly II enzyme | [ | |||
Activity of Gly II increased under toxic concentrations of MG and NaCl stresses Transgenic plants showed improved growth, increased shoot and root K+ content and better ion balance (ratio of Na+/K+) under salt stress | [ | |||
Improved salinity tolerance | [ | |||
Transgenic plants showed 15% to 50% increase in Gly I activity, and 300% to 400% increase in Gly II activity Reduced toxic Zn accumulation due to maintenance of phytochelatin and GSH content Improved growth, flowering behavior and set normal viable seeds, better yield | [ | |||
Reduced MG, decreased Na+/K+ ratio and maintenance of reduced glutathione levels under 200 mM NaCl or 1 mM MG or 5 mM H2O2 | [ |