Reynaldo Martorell1. 1. Robert W. Woodruff Professor of International Nutrition, Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to review why the first 1000 days of life are a vulnerable period of human development and the long-term effects of a nutrition experiment carried out in Guatemala (1969-1977). METHODS: In 1969-77, a supplement called Atole, containing high quality protein, energy and micronutrients, was provided to women during pregnancy and lactation and to children <7 years of age in two villages while in two control villages a low-energy drink called Fresco was provided. The villages were assigned at random to the treatment groups. RESULTS: Several reasons explain the vulnerability of the first 1000 days: rapid growth and development, high nutritional requirements, greater susceptibility to infections, high sensitivity to programming effects and full dependence on others for care, nutrition, and social interaction. Compared with Fresco, Atole improved total nutrient intakes (protein, energy, and micronutrients) and reduced stunting, but only in children < 3 years of age. A study in 2002-2004 showed that schooling, reading, and intelligence were improved in Atole villages, but only in those who received Atole before the age of 3 years. Wages of men were increased by 46% in those provided Atole through the age of 2 years. Findings for cardiovascular disease risk factors were inconclusive, perhaps because of the young age of the sample. A new study focusing on chronic diseases is ongoing (ages 38-54 years). CONCLUSIONS: The Guatemalan studies indicate that substantial improvement in adult human capital and economic productivity resulted from the nutrition intervention. This provides a powerful argument for promoting improvements in nutrition in pregnant women and young children in low income countries.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to review why the first 1000 days of life are a vulnerable period of human development and the long-term effects of a nutrition experiment carried out in Guatemala (1969-1977). METHODS: In 1969-77, a supplement called Atole, containing high quality protein, energy and micronutrients, was provided to women during pregnancy and lactation and to children <7 years of age in two villages while in two control villages a low-energy drink called Fresco was provided. The villages were assigned at random to the treatment groups. RESULTS: Several reasons explain the vulnerability of the first 1000 days: rapid growth and development, high nutritional requirements, greater susceptibility to infections, high sensitivity to programming effects and full dependence on others for care, nutrition, and social interaction. Compared with Fresco, Atole improved total nutrient intakes (protein, energy, and micronutrients) and reduced stunting, but only in children < 3 years of age. A study in 2002-2004 showed that schooling, reading, and intelligence were improved in Atole villages, but only in those who received Atole before the age of 3 years. Wages of men were increased by 46% in those provided Atole through the age of 2 years. Findings for cardiovascular disease risk factors were inconclusive, perhaps because of the young age of the sample. A new study focusing on chronic diseases is ongoing (ages 38-54 years). CONCLUSIONS: The Guatemalan studies indicate that substantial improvement in adult human capital and economic productivity resulted from the nutrition intervention. This provides a powerful argument for promoting improvements in nutrition in pregnant women and young children in low income countries.
Authors: Peter D Gluckman; Mark A Hanson; Patrick Bateson; Alan S Beedle; Catherine M Law; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Konstantin V Anokhin; Pierre Bougnères; Giriraj Ratan Chandak; Partha Dasgupta; George Davey Smith; Peter T Ellison; Terrence E Forrester; Scott F Gilbert; Eva Jablonka; Hillard Kaplan; Andrew M Prentice; Stephen J Simpson; Ricardo Uauy; Mary Jane West-Eberhard Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-05-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cesar G Victora; Linda Adair; Caroline Fall; Pedro C Hallal; Reynaldo Martorell; Linda Richter; Harshpal Singh Sachdev Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-01-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lesley Frank; Madeleine Waddington; Meaghan Sim; Misty Rossiter; Shannan Grant; Patricia L Williams Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2020-03-11
Authors: Zulfiqar A Bhutta; James A Berkley; Robert H J Bandsma; Marko Kerac; Indi Trehan; André Briend Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Phuong H Nguyen; Melissa F Young; Lan Mai Tran; Long Quynh Khuong; Thai Hong Duong; Hoang Cong Nguyen; Truong Viet Truong; Ann M DiGirolamo; Reynaldo Martorell; Usha Ramakrishnan Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 7.045