| Literature DB >> 28116333 |
Clare Beesley1, Rita J Guerreiro2, Jose T Bras2, Ruth E Williams3, Ana Lia Taratuto4, Christin Eltze5, Sara E Mole6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of deletions can complicate genetic diagnosis of autosomal recessive disease.Entities:
Keywords: Batten; CLN8; NCL; neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 28116333 PMCID: PMC5241206 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Figure 1Results for chromosome 8 from whole genome genotyping represented by the log ratio in the bottom and B allele frequencies on the top panels. The green vertical bar indicates the location of CLN8 in chromosome 8. A large homozygous deletion on 8p23.3 encompassing CLN8 can be identified in Child A by the abrupt decline in the log ratio accompanied by randomly placed markers in the B allele frequency showing no specific hybridization with any probe in the array (Reference sequence: NM_001042432.1).
Figure 2The upper panel is the array CGH result showing the heterozygous copy number loss of ~54 kb at 8p.23.3, which encompasses the gene (circled in red). The lower panel shows the Sanger sequencing results for the “hemizygous” c.728T>C, p.(Leu243Pro) novel variant in Child C. Upper and lower panels are the normal sequence (forward & reverse) and the middle panels are the patient (forward and reverse) (Reference sequence: NM_001042432.1).
Figure 3Sanger sequencing results for Child C showing the “hemizygous” c.763C>T, p.(Gln255*) mutation. Top and bottom panels are the normal sequence (forward and reverse) and the middle panels are the patient (forward and reverse) (Reference sequence: NM_001042432.1).
Comparison of families with large genomic deletions encompassing CLN8
| Case | A (UCL303 Pa) | B | C | Allen et al. ( | Reinhardt et al. ( | Typical late infantile CLN8 disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | Argentina | UK | UK | Eire | Turkey | – |
| Consanguinity | No | No | No | No | Yes | N/A |
| Developmental delay | ? | No | No | Yes | ? | Yes |
| Microcephaly | ? | No | No | Yes, 9th centile | ? | Yes |
| Demanding behavior | ? | No | No | Yes | ? | ? |
| Speech delay | ? | Mild | No | ? | 4 years | Yes |
| Psychomotor regression | 4 years | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | |
| Disease onset | 3 years | 4 years | 3 year 8 months | 4 year | 2.5 years | 3.5–4 years |
| Onset unsteady gait | 4 years | 4 year 1 month | 5 year 2 months | 4 years | ||
| Onset seizures | 3 year 8 months | 4 year 4 months | 4 year 9 months | 4.5 year | 3/3.5 years | 4–6 years |
| Onset myoclonus | 3 year 6 months | 4 year 4 months | ? | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Onset drop attacks | 4 years | 4 year 4 months | ? | |||
| Chairbound | ? | By 5 year 9 months | By 7 years | 5.5 year | 5 years | 6 years |
| Visual failure | ? | By 4 year 8 months | From 3 year 8 months | ? | 6 years | 7–9 years |
| Immobilization | ? | 5 year 9 months | ? | 8 years | 9 year‐early teens | |
| Vacuolated lymphocytes | Not done | No | No | No | No | |
| Ultrastructural EM | CL in skin biopsy | FP in lymphocytes | FP in lymphocytes | CL and FP in skin biopsy; FP in lymphocytes | CL, FP | CL, sometimes with FP or GROD |
| Electrophysiology EEG, ERG, VER, EMG, NCS |
VEP abnormal at 5 years |
ERG absent at 5 years | EEG abnormal 4 year 9 months | EEG: slow background, complex partial; ERG absent; VER reduced EMG normal; NCS normal | VEP and ERG by age 7, extinguished ERG by 10 | |
| Brain imaging | Cerebellar atrophy, low signal change abnormality in thalami bilaterally | Hyperintensity of white matter plus Cerebellar atrophy | Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy | Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy | ||
| Genetics (novel in |
|
|
| c.562_563delCT, p.(Leu188Valfs*58) (paternal); 8p23.3 terminal deletion, de novo | c.544‐2566_590del2613 | N/A |
?, Not reported or not known.