Literature DB >> 28115474

Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL and 100 Units/mL in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles and Variability Using Morning or Evening Injections.

Richard M Bergenstal1, Timothy S Bailey2, David Rodbard3, Monika Ziemen4, Hailing Guo5, Isabel Muehlen-Bartmer4, Andrew J Ahmann6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare glucose control in participants with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) or glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in the morning or evening, in combination with mealtime insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 16-week, exploratory, open-label, parallel-group, two-period crossover study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01658579), 59 adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized (1:1:1:1) to once-daily Gla-300 or Gla-100 given in the morning or evening (with crossover in the injection schedule). The primary efficacy end point was the mean percentage of time in the target glucose range (80-140 mg/dL), as measured using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), during the last 2 weeks of each 8-week period. Additional end points included other CGM glycemic control parameters, hypoglycemia (per self-monitored plasma glucose [SMPG]), and adverse events.
RESULTS: The percentage of time within the target glucose range was comparable between the Gla-300 and Gla-100 groups. There was significantly less increase in CGM-based glucose during the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval for Gla-300 compared with Gla-100 (least squares mean difference -14.7 mg/dL [95% CI -26.9 to -2.5]; P = 0.0192). Mean 24-h glucose curves for the Gla-300 group were smoother (lower glycemic excursions), irrespective of morning or evening injection. Four metrics of intrasubject interstitial glucose variability showed no difference between Gla-300 and Gla-100. Nocturnal confirmed (<54 mg/dL by SMPG) or severe hypoglycemia rate was lower for Gla-300 participants than for Gla-100 participants (4.0 vs. 9.0 events per participant-year; rate ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.24-0.82]).
CONCLUSIONS: Less increase in CGM-based glucose levels in the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval, smoother average 24-h glucose profiles irrespective of injection time, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed with Gla-300 versus Gla-100.
© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28115474     DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  38 in total

1.  Advances in Care for Insulin-Requiring Patients Without Closed Loop.

Authors:  Rayhan A Lal; Bruce Buckingham; David M Maahs
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time.

Authors:  Chantal Mathieu; Pieter Gillard; Katrien Benhalima
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 3.  Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Recommendations on Reporting.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Katharine Barnard; Richard Bergenstal; Emanuele Bosi; Satish Garg; Bruno Guerci; Thomas Haak; Irl B Hirsch; Linong Ji; Shashank R Joshi; Maarten Kamp; Lori Laffel; Chantal Mathieu; William H Polonsky; Frank Snoek; Philip Home
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 4.  [Insulin therapy-new insulin analogues].

Authors:  M Ehren; H H Klein
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Derek LeRoith; Geert Jan Biessels; Susan S Braithwaite; Felipe F Casanueva; Boris Draznin; Jeffrey B Halter; Irl B Hirsch; Marie E McDonnell; Mark E Molitch; M Hassan Murad; Alan J Sinclair
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Evaluation of Patient Reported Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus 100 U/mL in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Flash Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Ayman Abdullah Al Hayek; Asirvatham Alwin Robert; Abdulghani H Al Saeed; Mohamed Abdulaziz Al Dawish
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2022-05-18

8.  Clinical research of insulin glargine U300 in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with frequent hypoglycaemia: real-world experience.

Authors:  Savaş Volkan Kişioğlu; Ahmet Suat Demir; Damla Tufekci; Yasemin Emur Gunay; Hulya Coskun; Ozge Ucuncu; Irfan Nuhoglu; Mustafa Kocak; Serdar Karakullukcu; Halil Onder Ersoz
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2021-04-20

9.  Insulin doses requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes using glargine U300 or degludec in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Florentino Carral San Laureano; Mariana Tomé Fernández-Ladreda; Ana Isabel Jiménez Millán; Concepción García Calzado; María Del Carmen Ayala Ortega
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Minimal and Maximal Models to Quantitate Glucose Metabolism: Tools to Measure, to Simulate and to Run in Silico Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Chiara Dalla Man
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.