GOAL: We use noninvasive data (body surface potential mapping, BSPM) to personalize the main parameters of a cardiac electrophysiological (EP) model for predicting the response to different pacing conditions. METHODS: First, an efficient forward model is proposed, coupling the Mitchell-Schaeffer transmembrane potential model with a current dipole formulation. Then, we estimate the main parameters of the cardiac model: activation onset location and tissue conductivity. A large patient-specific database of simulated BSPM is generated, from which specific features are extracted to train a machine learning algorithm. The activation onset location is computed from a Kernel Ridge Regression and a second regression calibrates the global ventricular conductivity. RESULTS: The evaluation of the results is done both on a benchmark dataset of a patient with premature ventricular contraction (PVC) and on five nonischaemic implanted cardiac resynchonization therapy (CRT) patients with a total of 21 different pacing conditions. Good personalization results were found in terms of the activation onset location for the PVC (mean distance error, MDE = 20.3 mm), for the pacing sites (MDE = 21.7 mm) and for the CRT patients (MDE = 24.6 mm). We tested the predictive power of the personalized model for biventricular pacing and showed that we could predict the new electrical activity patterns with a good accuracy in terms of BSPM signals. CONCLUSION: We have personalized the cardiac EP model and predicted new patient-specific pacing conditions. SIGNIFICANCE: This is an encouraging first step towards a noninvasive preoperative prediction of the response to different pacing conditions to assist clinicians for CRT patient selection and therapy planning.
GOAL: We use noninvasive data (body surface potential mapping, BSPM) to personalize the main parameters of a cardiac electrophysiological (EP) model for predicting the response to different pacing conditions. METHODS: First, an efficient forward model is proposed, coupling the Mitchell-Schaeffer transmembrane potential model with a current dipole formulation. Then, we estimate the main parameters of the cardiac model: activation onset location and tissue conductivity. A large patient-specific database of simulated BSPM is generated, from which specific features are extracted to train a machine learning algorithm. The activation onset location is computed from a Kernel Ridge Regression and a second regression calibrates the global ventricular conductivity. RESULTS: The evaluation of the results is done both on a benchmark dataset of a patient with premature ventricular contraction (PVC) and on five nonischaemic implanted cardiac resynchonization therapy (CRT) patients with a total of 21 different pacing conditions. Good personalization results were found in terms of the activation onset location for the PVC (mean distance error, MDE = 20.3 mm), for the pacing sites (MDE = 21.7 mm) and for the CRT patients (MDE = 24.6 mm). We tested the predictive power of the personalized model for biventricular pacing and showed that we could predict the new electrical activity patterns with a good accuracy in terms of BSPM signals. CONCLUSION: We have personalized the cardiac EP model and predicted new patient-specific pacing conditions. SIGNIFICANCE: This is an encouraging first step towards a noninvasive preoperative prediction of the response to different pacing conditions to assist clinicians for CRT patient selection and therapy planning.
Authors: Jwala Dhamala; Hermenegild J Arevalo; John Sapp; B Milan Horácek; Katherine C Wu; Natalia A Trayanova; Linwei Wang Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Gavin R Philips; Bernhard Gleich; Genaro A Paredes-Juarez; Antonella Antonelli; Mauro Magnani; Jeff W M Bulte Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Jwala Dhamala; Pradeep Bajracharya; Hermenegild J Arevalo; John L Sapp; B Milan Horácek; Katherine C Wu; Natalia A Trayanova; Linwei Wang Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Ana Ferrer-Albero; Eduardo J Godoy; Miguel Lozano; Laura Martínez-Mateu; Felipe Atienza; Javier Saiz; Rafael Sebastian Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Angela W C Lee; Caroline Mendonca Costa; Marina Strocchi; Christopher A Rinaldi; Steven A Niederer Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 4.132