Sara V Branson1, Brendan R McClafferty2, Shree K Kurup3. 1. 1 Ophthalmology Department, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, Georgia . 2. 2 Departments of Ophthalmology and Family Medicine, Wake Forest University , Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 3. 3 Retina Center , Tucson, Arizona.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Macular pathology, including macular holes (MHs), epiretinal membranes (ERMs), and macular edema, is a cause of irreversible vision loss in the setting of uveitis. Medical management involves corticosteroids, immunomodulatory medications, and biologics to control inflammation. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) has been suggested as a therapy for uveitis, with reports of reduced inflammation and decreased dependence on medication postoperatively. Currently, PPV is reserved for retinal detachments, vitreous opacities, and ERMs, causing vitreomacular traction. However, little is known about the visual outcomes of PPV with ERM peel for MH, or in ERM without evidence of traction in the context of uveitis. METHODS: Review of small case series and case reports support both conservative medical treatment and vitrectomy, independently, and in combination, in the management of macular pathology in the setting of uveitis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are required to study uveitic etiologies separately with respect to visual outcomes after vitreoretinal surgery and medical management.
PURPOSE: Macular pathology, including macular holes (MHs), epiretinal membranes (ERMs), and macular edema, is a cause of irreversible vision loss in the setting of uveitis. Medical management involves corticosteroids, immunomodulatory medications, and biologics to control inflammation. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) has been suggested as a therapy for uveitis, with reports of reduced inflammation and decreased dependence on medication postoperatively. Currently, PPV is reserved for retinal detachments, vitreous opacities, and ERMs, causing vitreomacular traction. However, little is known about the visual outcomes of PPV with ERM peel for MH, or in ERM without evidence of traction in the context of uveitis. METHODS: Review of small case series and case reports support both conservative medical treatment and vitrectomy, independently, and in combination, in the management of macular pathology in the setting of uveitis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are required to study uveitic etiologies separately with respect to visual outcomes after vitreoretinal surgery and medical management.
Entities:
Keywords:
epiretinal membrane; macular edema; macular hole; pars plana vitrectomy; uveitis; vitreoretinal surgery
Authors: Natalia F Callaway; Marco A Gonzalez; Yoshihiro Yonekawa; Lisa J Faia; Efrem D Mandelcorn; Rahul N Khurana; Mohamed G A Saleh; Phoebe Lin; Lucia Sobrin; Thomas A Albini Journal: Retina Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Roberto dell'Omo; Mariaelena Filippelli; Serena De Turris; Luca Cimino; David H Steel; Carlos E Pavesio; Andrea Govetto; Ismael Chehaibou; Francesco Parmeggiani; Mario R Romano; Lucia Ziccardi; Enza Pirozzi; Ciro Costagliola Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 4.799