Ting Yang1, Qianxin Liu1,2, Min Lu1, Lingyue Ma1, Ying Zhou1,2, Yimin Cui1,2. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, 6 Dahongluochang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. 2. Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). METHODS: The literature was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis of CINV using PubMed, Embase, Central, as well as clinicaltrials.gov for unpublished studies. The endpoints of the study were the number of patients who achieved a complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue) and no nausea in the acute, delayed and overall phases. Two authors independently selected studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The included RCTs were analysed using RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Ten RCTs were identified for the meta-analysis. Compared with other antiemetic agents, olanzapine significantly improved the CR in the delayed and overall phases, but did not enhance the CR in the acute phase. For the control of CINV, olanzapine was better than and comparable with aprepitant in the acute phase and delayed phase, respectively. Compared with placebo, treatment with 5 mg and 10 mg olanzapine exhibited similar efficacy in terms of the CR in the delayed and overall phases. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine is an excellent alternative for the prophylaxis of CINV. Olanzapine 5 mg per day should be recommended as the initial dose because of equivalent efficacy to a 10 mg dose but a lower potential risk of side effects. Further studies are needed to explore the optimal combination of medicines.
AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). METHODS: The literature was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis of CINV using PubMed, Embase, Central, as well as clinicaltrials.gov for unpublished studies. The endpoints of the study were the number of patients who achieved a complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue) and no nausea in the acute, delayed and overall phases. Two authors independently selected studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The included RCTs were analysed using RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Ten RCTs were identified for the meta-analysis. Compared with other antiemetic agents, olanzapine significantly improved the CR in the delayed and overall phases, but did not enhance the CR in the acute phase. For the control of CINV, olanzapine was better than and comparable with aprepitant in the acute phase and delayed phase, respectively. Compared with placebo, treatment with 5 mg and 10 mg olanzapine exhibited similar efficacy in terms of the CR in the delayed and overall phases. CONCLUSIONS:Olanzapine is an excellent alternative for the prophylaxis of CINV. Olanzapine 5 mg per day should be recommended as the initial dose because of equivalent efficacy to a 10 mg dose but a lower potential risk of side effects. Further studies are needed to explore the optimal combination of medicines.
Authors: Ethan Basch; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Paul J Hesketh; Mark G Kris; Petra C Feyer; Mark R Somerfield; Maurice Chesney; Rebecca Anne Clark-Snow; Anne Marie Flaherty; Barbara Freundlich; Gary Morrow; Kamakshi V Rao; Rowena N Schwartz; Gary H Lyman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rudolph M Navari; Lawrence H Einhorn; Steven D Passik; Patrick J Loehrer; Cynthia Johnson; M L Mayer; J McClean; Jake Vinson; W Pletcher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Leonard Chiu; Ronald Chow; Marko Popovic; Rudolph M Navari; Nathan M Shumway; Nicholas Chiu; Henry Lam; Milica Milakovic; Mark Pasetka; Sherlyn Vuong; Edward Chow; Carlo DeAngelis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: J Flank; T Schechter; P Gibson; D L Johnston; A D Orsey; C Portwine; L Sung; L L Dupuis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: M Clemons; G Dranitsaris; M Sienkiewicz; S Sehdev; T Ng; A Robinson; M Mates; T Hsu; S McGee; O Freedman; V Kumar; D Fergusson; B Hutton; L Vandermeer; J Hilton Journal: Breast Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 4.380