| Literature DB >> 28111445 |
Y N Zhang1, J Wang1, B Qi1, S G Wu1, H R Chen2, H Y Luo2, D J Yin3, F J Lü3, H J Zhang1, G H Qi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to determine whether mango saponin (MS) could be used as a feed additive in broiler chicks by evaluating growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and plasma biochemical indices.Entities:
Keywords: Broiler Chick; Growth Performance; Mango Saponin; Meat Quality; Plasma Biochemical Index
Year: 2016 PMID: 28111445 PMCID: PMC5494488 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Composition and nutrient level of the basal diets
| Item | Age (d) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Starter phase (1 to 21 d of age) | Grower phase (22 to 42 d of age) | |
| Ingredient (%) | ||
| Corn | 56.37 | 63.48 |
| Soybean meal | 36.55 | 29.24 |
| Soybean oil | 3.00 | 3.50 |
| Salt | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.24 | 0.72 |
| Limestone | 1.61 | 1.67 |
| DL-methionine | 0.28 | 0.30 |
| L-lysine HCl | 0.20 | 0.27 |
| Threonine | 0.09 | 0.15 |
| Choline chloride (50% choline) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Premix | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Nutrient level | ||
| AME (MJ/kg) | 12.55 | 12.97 |
| CP (%) | 21.00 | 19.00 |
| Ca (%) | 1.00 | 0.90 |
| Available P (%) | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Lys (%) | 1.15 | 1.05 |
| Met (%) | 0.55 | 0.48 |
| Met+Cys (%) | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| Thr (%) | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| Trp (%) | 0.21 | 0.18 |
AME, apparent metabolizable energy; CP, crude protein.
Premix supplied per kg of diet: Vitamin A 12,500 IU; Vitamin D3 2,500 IU; Vitamin E 15 IU; Vitamin K3 2.65 mg; Vitamin B1 2 mg; Vitamin B2 6 mg; Vitamin B12 0.025 mg; biotin 0.0325 mg; folic acid 1.25 mg; Ca-pantothenate 12 mg; niacin 50 mg; Cu 8 mg; Zn 75 mg; Fe 80 mg; Mn 100 mg; Se 0.15 mg; I 0.35 mg.
The nutrient level listed in the table are calculated values.
Effect of dietary mango saponin supplementation on growth performance of broiler chicks
| Item | Control | Mango saponin levels (%) | SEM | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0.14 | 0.28 | ||||
| Starter phase (1–21 d) | |||||
| BW d 21 (g) | 852 | 870 | 886 | 13.9 | 0.465 |
| ADG (g) | 39.0 | 40.1 | 40.6 | 0.59 | 0.587 |
| ADFI (g/bird/d) | 52.3 | 52.6 | 54.1 | 0.53 | 0.341 |
| FCR (g/g) | 1.34 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 0.01 | 0.542 |
| Grower phase (22–42 d) | |||||
| BW d 42 (g) | 2,586 | 2,723 | 2,717 | 25.7 | 0.038 |
| ADG (g) | 81.6 | 86.6 | 86.0 | 1.00 | 0.040 |
| ADFI (g/bird/d) | 150 | 156 | 153 | 1.92 | 0.481 |
| FCR (g/g) | 1.84 | 1.80 | 1.77 | 0.02 | 0.237 |
| Whole phase (1–42 d) | |||||
| ADG (g) | 59.1 | 61.8 | 62.3 | 0.53 | 0.017 |
| ADFI (g/bird) | 98.2 | 100.7 | 100.9 | 1.05 | 0.533 |
| FCR (g/g) | 1.66 | 1.63 | 1.62 | 0.01 | 0.276 |
SEM, standard error of the mean; BW, body weight; ADG, average daily weight gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
n = 6.
Means within a row with no common superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).
Effect of dietary mango saponin supplementation on carcass characteristics of broiler chicks
| Item | Control | Mango saponin levels (%) | SEM | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0.14 | 0.28 | ||||
| At 21 d of age (%) | |||||
| Dressing percentage | 71.8 | 70.0 | 71.1 | 0.44 | 0.271 |
| Breast muscle yield | 21.2 | 19.8 | 20.5 | 0.39 | 0.363 |
| Leg muscle yield | 18.7 | 19.1 | 18.9 | 0.22 | 0.774 |
| Abdominal fat | 1.53 | 1.47 | 1.49 | 0.08 | 0.952 |
| At 42 d of age (%) | |||||
| Dressing percentage | 74.1 | 74.1 | 75.0 | 0.48 | 0.642 |
| Breast muscle yield | 25.1 | 26.2 | 25.0 | 0.52 | 0.688 |
| Leg muscle yield | 19.9 | 20.0 | 20.8 | 0.39 | 0.633 |
| Abdominal fat | 1.98 | 1.97 | 1.96 | 0.07 | 0.991 |
SEM, standard error of the mean.
n = 6.
Percentage of body weight at slaughter.
Percentage of carcass weight after eviscerated and without head, paws or giblets.
Percentage of carcass and abdominal fat weight.
Effect of dietary mango saponin supplementation on meat quality of broiler chicks on d 42
| Item | Control | Mango saponin levels (%) | SEM | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 0.14 | 0.28 | ||||
| Drip loss (%) | 3.93 | 3.45 | 2.65 | 0.18 | 0.005 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 23.2 | 20.8 | 21.0 | 0.50 | 0.084 |
| Shear value (N) | 14.7 | 11.8 | 11.4 | 0.77 | 0.179 |
| 45 min postmortem | |||||
| pH | 6.45 | 6.48 | 6.53 | 0.02 | 0.401 |
| L* | 51.7 | 48.9 | 47.7 | 0.70 | 0.048 |
| a* | 6.33 | 6.59 | 7.82 | 0.22 | 0.005 |
| b* | 18.6 | 16.2 | 17.4 | 0.39 | 0.027 |
| 24 h postmortem | |||||
| pH | 5.84 | 5.91 | 5.92 | 0.02 | 0.434 |
| L* | 58.9 | 58.8 | 55.0 | 0.71 | 0.018 |
| a* | 5.46 | 5.98 | 7.35 | 0.25 | <0.001 |
| b* | 21.3 | 18.1 | 19.7 | 0.40 | 0.001 |
SEM, standard error of the mean; L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness.
n = 6.
Means within a row with no common superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).
Effect of dietary mango saponin supplementation on plasma antioxidant and biochemical indices of broiler chicks
| Item | Age (d) | Control | Mango saponin levels (%) | SEM | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 0.14 | 0.28 | |||||
| SOD (U/mL) | 21 | 29.5 | 33.8 | 34.5 | 0.95 | 0.205 |
| 42 | 40.3 | 41.1 | 34.0 | 0.54 | 0.377 | |
| TAC (U/mL) | 21 | 6.97 | 9.26 | 7.92 | 0.22 | <0.001 |
| 42 | 4.85 | 5.22 | 5.65 | 0.21 | 0.251 | |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 21 | 4.27 | 3.30 | 3.33 | 0.18 | 0.195 |
| 42 | 3.81 | 3.17 | 3.06 | 0.15 | 0.105 | |
| TC (mmol/L) | 21 | 3.03 | 3.00 | 2.47 | 0.10 | 0.047 |
| 42 | 3.11 | 2.93 | 2.65 | 0.11 | 0.037 | |
| TG (mmol/L) | 21 | 0.86 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.06 | <0.001 |
| 42 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.06 | 0.034 | |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 21 | 2.47 | 2.64 | 2.17 | 0.09 | 0.084 |
| 42 | 2.48 | 2.75 | 2.52 | 0.07 | 0.256 | |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 21 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.109 |
| 42 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 0.934 | |
| ALT (U/L) | 21 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 2.60 | 0.24 | 0.540 |
| 42 | 2.40 | 2.25 | 1.60 | 0.17 | 0.137 | |
| AST (U/L) | 21 | 264 | 266 | 250 | 6.67 | 0.613 |
| 42 | 342 | 323 | 312 | 9.00 | 0.433 | |
| TP (g/L) | 21 | 28.1 | 29.2 | 29.4 | 0.45 | 0.465 |
| 42 | 30.8 | 34.3 | 35.1 | 0.88 | 0.096 | |
| ALB (g/L) | 21 | 13.8 | 14.3 | 14.7 | 0.21 | 0.276 |
| 42 | 14.8 | 15.8 | 16.3 | 0.35 | 0.193 | |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 21 | 13.4 | 13.6 | 12.1 | 0.42 | 0.284 |
| 42 | 16.2 | 15.6 | 14.0 | 0.30 | <0.001 | |
SEM, standard error of the mean; SOD, total superoxide dismutase; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; MDA, malondialdehyde; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; GLU, glucose.
n = 6.
Means within a row with no common superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).