Laura K Ferris1, Aaron S Farberg2, Brooke Middlebrook3, Clare E Johnson3, Natalie Lassen3, Kristen M Oelschlager3, Derek J Maetzold3, Robert W Cook3, Darrell S Rigel4, Pedram Gerami5. 1. Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: ferrlk@upmc.edu. 2. National Society for Cutaneous Medicine, New York, New York. 3. Castle Biosciences Inc, Friendswood, Texas. 4. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 5. Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-defined early-stage cutaneous melanoma have disease recurrence and die. A 31-gene expression profile (GEP) that accurately assesses metastatic risk associated with primary cutaneous melanomas has been described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare accuracy of the GEP in combination with risk determined using the web-based AJCC Individualized Melanoma Patient Outcome Prediction Tool. METHODS: GEP results from 205 stage I/II cutaneous melanomas with sufficient clinical data for prognostication using the AJCC tool were classified as low (class 1) or high (class 2) risk. Two 5-year overall survival cutoffs (AJCC 79% and 68%), reflecting survival for patients with stage IIA or IIB disease, respectively, were assigned for binary AJCC risk. RESULTS: Cox univariate analysis revealed significant risk classification of distant metastasis-free and overall survival (hazard ratio range 3.2-9.4, P < .001) for both tools. In all, 43 (21%) cases had discordant GEP and AJCC classification (using 79% cutoff). Eleven of 13 (85%) deaths in that group were predicted as high risk by GEP but low risk by AJCC. LIMITATIONS: Specimens reflect tertiary care center referrals; more effective therapies have been approved for clinical use after accrual. CONCLUSIONS: The GEP provides valuable prognostic information and improves identification of high-risk melanomas when used together with the AJCC online prediction tool.
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-defined early-stage cutaneous melanoma have disease recurrence and die. A 31-gene expression profile (GEP) that accurately assesses metastatic risk associated with primary cutaneous melanomas has been described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare accuracy of the GEP in combination with risk determined using the web-based AJCC Individualized MelanomaPatient Outcome Prediction Tool. METHODS: GEP results from 205 stage I/II cutaneous melanomas with sufficient clinical data for prognostication using the AJCC tool were classified as low (class 1) or high (class 2) risk. Two 5-year overall survival cutoffs (AJCC 79% and 68%), reflecting survival for patients with stage IIA or IIB disease, respectively, were assigned for binary AJCC risk. RESULTS: Cox univariate analysis revealed significant risk classification of distant metastasis-free and overall survival (hazard ratio range 3.2-9.4, P < .001) for both tools. In all, 43 (21%) cases had discordant GEP and AJCC classification (using 79% cutoff). Eleven of 13 (85%) deaths in that group were predicted as high risk by GEP but low risk by AJCC. LIMITATIONS: Specimens reflect tertiary care center referrals; more effective therapies have been approved for clinical use after accrual. CONCLUSIONS: The GEP provides valuable prognostic information and improves identification of high-risk melanomas when used together with the AJCC online prediction tool.
Authors: Emanuelle M Rizk; Angelina M Seffens; Megan H Trager; Michael R Moore; Larisa J Geskin; Robyn D Gartrell-Corrado; Winston Wong; Yvonne M Saenger Journal: Am J Clin Dermatol Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 7.403
Authors: Jacob S Ankeny; Brian Labadie; Jason Luke; Eddy Hsueh; Jane Messina; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Roy Rabbie; Peter Ferguson; Christian Molina-Aguilar; David J Adams; Carla D Robles-Espinoza Journal: J Pathol Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Brian R Gastman; Jonathan S Zager; Jane L Messina; Robert W Cook; Kyle R Covington; Brooke Middlebrook; Pedram Gerami; Jeffrey D Wayne; Sancy Leachman; John T Vetto Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: S Podlipnik; C Carrera; A Boada; N A Richarz; J L López-Estebaranz; F Pinedo-Moraleda; M Elosua-González; M M Martín-González; R Carrillo-Gijón; P Redondo; E Moreno; J Malvehy; S Puig Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 6.166