Literature DB >> 28109762

Higher Modified Charlson Index Scores Are Associated With Increased Incidence of Complications, Transfusion Events, and Length of Stay Following Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Nikita Lakomkin1, Vadim Goz2, Claudette M Lajam1, Richard Iorio1, Joseph A Bosco1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (RHA) has been associated with greater morbidity and length of stay (LOS) compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. Despite this, few validated metrics exist for risk stratification in RHA cohorts. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) has been associated with complications in total hip arthroplasty, but its utility in revision surgery remains unexplored. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between preoperative CCI and a variety of outcome metrics following RHA.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify all patients undergoing aseptic RHA between 2006 and 2013. A variety of demographics and perioperative variables were collected. Modified CCI scores were computed for each patient based on a validated formula incorporating comorbidities found in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Outcome variables of interest included mortality, major postoperative complications, minor adverse events, incidence of transfusion, and prolonged LOS. Perioperative factors were tested for association with these outcomes using bivariate analysis and significant variables were then incorporated into a logistic regression model to explore the relationship between preoperative CCI scores and postoperative events.
RESULTS: In a multivariable regression model controlling for the significant perioperative variables, operative time, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, higher CCI scores were significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-2.18, P < .001), major complications (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20, P = .001), minor complications (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.69, P < .001), transfusions (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.20, P < .001), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Higher preoperative CCI scores were independent risk factors for numerous complications. This highlights the potential utility of the CCI in risk stratification for RHA populations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse events; comorbidities; revision arthroplasty; risk stratification; total joint arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28109762     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Association of preoperative medication with postoperative length of stay in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Jianghua Shen; Yahui Yu; Chaodong Wang; Yanqi Chu; Suying Yan
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  The Association Between Common Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Morbidity and Overall Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wenli Liu; Aiham Qdaisat; Jason Yeung; Gabriel Lopez; Jeffrey Weinberg; Shouhao Zhou; Lorenzo Cohen; Eduardo Bruera; Sai-Ching J Yeung
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-07-26

3.  Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate is a marker for postoperative complications following aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron Z Chen; Alex Gu; Nicolas A Selemon; Jordan S Cohen; Chapman Wei; Haley Tornberg; Marc D Chodos; Joshua Campbell; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-08

4.  Economic Impact of Outpatient Medicare Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Charles M Davis; Eric R Swenson; Travis M Lehman; Derek A Haas
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Do-Not-Resuscitate status as an independent risk factor for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture.

Authors:  Ethan Y Brovman; Andrew J Pisansky; Anair Beverly; Angela M Bader; Richard D Urman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-12-18

6.  Type 2 diabetes and in-hospital complications after revision of total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ana López-de-Andrés; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Maria A Martínez-Huedo; Manuel Villanueva-Martinez; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; Rodrigo Jiménez-García
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Risk stratification in primary total joint arthroplasty: the current state of knowledge.

Authors:  Christian Gronbeck; Mark P Cote; Jay R Lieberman; Mohamad J Halawi
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-02-05

Review 8.  The Update on Instruments Used for Evaluation of Comorbidities in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Łukasz Pulik; Michał Podgajny; Wiktor Kaczyński; Sylwia Sarzyńska; Paweł Łęgosz
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Returning to Normalcy or Returning to a New Normal?

Authors:  Erik N Zeegen; Adolph J Yates; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.757

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.