Literature DB >> 28109539

CEPI-a new global R&D organisation for epidemic preparedness and response.

Børge Brende1, Jeremy Farrar2, Diane Gashumba3, Carlos Moedas4, Trevor Mundel5, Yasuhisa Shiozaki6, Harsh Vardhan7, Johanna Wanka8, John-Arne Røttingen9.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28109539      PMCID: PMC7138390          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30131-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
The outbreak of Ebola virus disease in west Africa in 2013–16 showed that the world is not sufficiently prepared to detect and respond to epidemic threats. It exposed a systemic need for stronger operational and strategic capabilities in infectious disease response, and for the development of more effective tools and technologies to manage, treat, and prevent disease. Evaluations of the Ebola response highlight that the global community must rethink how vaccines, diagnostics, and drugs for emerging infections are developed given their lack of commercial profitability, especially since outbreaks are most likely to occur in resource-constrained environments. Two Ebola panels called for a new global financing mechanism to invest US$1 billion annually; all panels recommended a strong normative and convening role for WHO. WHO has duly initiated a research and development (R&D) Blueprint to coordinate its own and other stakeholders' work on product-relevant R&D for infectious diseases with epidemic potential. A network of research funding organisations, the Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness (GloPID-R), has been initiated by the European Commission to coordinate rapid research response to public health emergencies. But there remains an urgent need for entities that can facilitate pooled funding and implementation of R&D for epidemic preparedness on a global scale, since these are not among WHO's core functions. In January, 2016, the World Economic Forum convened a group of representatives to explore the way forward, with vaccine development as the starting focus. The Ebola epidemic had shown that fast-track and collaborative development of vaccines was possible. More than 15 clinical vaccine trials (phase 1, 2, and 3) were planned and implemented within a year from August, 2014, and the ring vaccination trial in Guinea showed effectiveness of the replication-competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) vectored vaccine for the prevention of Ebola virus disease in interim and final reports.4, 5 Now global efforts are also focused on Zika virus, another epidemic declared by WHO as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern between February, 2016, and November, 2016. Vaccine development has been initiated and several candidates have entered initial clinical testing. During the World Economic Forum meeting a consensus emerged on the need for a new approach to public–private collaboration to address epidemics and for exploring the establishment of a new financing mechanism. Now, CEPI—the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, a partnership between public, private, philanthropic, non-governmental, intergovernmental, and civil organisations, is launched on Jan 19 at the World Economic Forum's 2017 meeting. CEPI will be based in Oslo, Norway, with offices in the UK, India, and the USA, but will be a global organisation with partners on all continents. CEPI provides a new funding model for the development of vaccines against epidemic infectious diseases through pooling resources from several investors. This coalition will build a new system to advance the development of safe, effective, and affordable vaccines, ensuring that price is not a barrier to access for populations most at need. This will offer the world an insurance policy against the growing threat from emerging infectious diseases. CEPI will fill the gap between the normative functions of WHO and the procurement and delivery mandate of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and close an important gap in global health architecture. CEPI has two main objectives: to advance vaccine candidates against priority pathogens and to build technical and institutional platforms that accelerate the R&D response to known or unknown pathogen emergencies. A description of how plans for CEPI developed and its business plan are outlined by one of us (J-AR) and representatives of the wider partnership in another report. For known high-priority threats, as defined by the WHO R&D Blueprint list, CEPI has a just-in-case strategy to push vaccine candidates from late preclinical through proof of concept and safety phase 2 trials. CEPI has decided to start by tackling Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS), Nipah virus infection, and Lassa fever, as well as scoping potential support for vaccines against Ebola (other strains than Zaire), Marburg, and Zika viruses. However, although CEPI knows these viruses could cause the next major outbreak, we are aware that it is more likely to arise from an unknown pathogen. Therefore, CEPI also has a just-in-time strategy, which aims to create the ability to respond quickly to new threats by investing in validating adaptable vaccine technology platforms and production facilities. CEPI needs to raise US$1 billion over 5 years to deliver on these strategies. This emphasis on preventing and preparing for outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics comes at a time when globalisation, urbanisation, and environmental and climate change mean that infectious diseases are increasingly global threats that respect no borders. Health protection is therefore dependent on investing collectively in global health security. The chain is no stronger than its weakest link. So the global community must invest in domestic capabilities that meet International Health Regulations requirements and establish core national capacities in all countries through building countries' workforce capabilities, strengthening real-time surveillance, and strengthening laboratory systems for earlier detection of potential threats. The global community must also invest in global capabilities such as the development of biomedical countermeasures. Although no-one knows what the next outbreak will be, we must develop the required arsenal now. No country can do this on its own. Countries need to invest in an insurance that collectively enables us to respond faster and mitigate risk to lives and livelihoods. CEPI is such a global health insurance mechanism. CEPI can achieve much more with pooled resources than any nation can achieve alone. Countries must invest together to generate global public goods. They need to act jointly because investments that protect the poorest people will make the world safer for all of us. We represent the first public and philanthropic funders to invest in CEPI. We have so far collectively committed about US$460 million to a pooled fund, and are working to mobilise more. The European Commission will contribute to CEPI's objectives and plans to co-fund actions with CEPI, such as through the Innovative Medicines Initiative. Together, we see such a coalition as an important investment for global epidemic preparedness. The impact of epidemics such as Zika virus, Ebola virus disease, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) on national and regional economies has shown that no country can afford not to invest in protection against outbreaks. However, more investors are needed—both to reach the US$1 billion over 5 years that would enable CEPI to realise this first phase of its mission, and because the initiative will be most successful with participation from countries of all sizes, geographical regions, and levels of economic development. CEPI will have a crucial role in generating necessary global public goods for populations in need. Global health governance calls for institutional innovations that can operate with the public and private sectors, governments, and non-governmental organisations, and that can build on normative guidance from UN organisations, such as WHO, to develop technologies that can be procured by delivery-oriented global health organisations and regional and national government agencies. CEPI will fill this gap in global health R&D, and we welcome more partners—both investors and implementers.
  7 in total

1.  Coordinating funding in public health emergencies.

Authors:  Line Matthiessen; Walter Colli; Jean-François Delfraissy; Eung-Soo Hwang; Jeffrey Mphahlele; Marc Ouellette
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Meeting Report: WHO consultation on considerations for regulatory expectations of Zika virus vaccines for use during an emergency.

Authors:  K S Vannice; B K Giersing; D C Kaslow; E Griffiths; H Meyer; A Barrett; A P Durbin; D Wood; J Hombach
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine expressing Ebola surface glycoprotein: interim results from the Guinea ring vaccination cluster-randomised trial.

Authors:  Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo; Ira M Longini; Matthias Egger; Natalie E Dean; W John Edmunds; Anton Camacho; Miles W Carroll; Moussa Doumbia; Bertrand Draguez; Sophie Duraffour; Godwin Enwere; Rebecca Grais; Stephan Gunther; Stefanie Hossmann; Mandy Kader Kondé; Souleymane Kone; Eeva Kuisma; Myron M Levine; Sema Mandal; Gunnstein Norheim; Ximena Riveros; Aboubacar Soumah; Sven Trelle; Andrea S Vicari; Conall H Watson; Sakoba Kéïta; Marie Paule Kieny; John-Arne Røttingen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!).

Authors:  Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo; Anton Camacho; Ira M Longini; Conall H Watson; W John Edmunds; Matthias Egger; Miles W Carroll; Natalie E Dean; Ibrahima Diatta; Moussa Doumbia; Bertrand Draguez; Sophie Duraffour; Godwin Enwere; Rebecca Grais; Stephan Gunther; Pierre-Stéphane Gsell; Stefanie Hossmann; Sara Viksmoen Watle; Mandy Kader Kondé; Sakoba Kéïta; Souleymane Kone; Eewa Kuisma; Myron M Levine; Sema Mandal; Thomas Mauget; Gunnstein Norheim; Ximena Riveros; Aboubacar Soumah; Sven Trelle; Andrea S Vicari; John-Arne Røttingen; Marie-Paule Kieny
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Zika virus and microcephaly: why is this situation a PHEIC?

Authors:  David L Heymann; Abraham Hodgson; Amadou Alpha Sall; David O Freedman; J Erin Staples; Fernando Althabe; Kalpana Baruah; Ghazala Mahmud; Nyoman Kandun; Pedro F C Vasconcelos; Silvia Bino; K U Menon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Toward a Common Secure Future: Four Global Commissions in the Wake of Ebola.

Authors:  Lawrence O Gostin; Oyewale Tomori; Suwit Wibulpolprasert; Ashish K Jha; Julio Frenk; Suerie Moon; Joy Phumaphi; Peter Piot; Barbara Stocking; Victor J Dzau; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  The need for global R&D coordination for infectious diseases with epidemic potential.

Authors:  Marie Paule Kieny; John-Arne Rottingen; Jeremy Farrar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Improving vaccine trials in infectious disease emergencies.

Authors:  Marc Lipsitch; Nir Eyal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Design of vaccine efficacy trials during public health emergencies.

Authors:  Natalie E Dean; Pierre-Stéphane Gsell; Ron Brookmeyer; Victor De Gruttola; Christl A Donnelly; M Elizabeth Halloran; Momodou Jasseh; Martha Nason; Ximena Riveros; Conall H Watson; Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo; Ira M Longini
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Differential Immune Responses to New World and Old World Mammalian Arenaviruses.

Authors:  Hinh Ly
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Prepared for the 'unexpected'? Lessons from the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa on integrating emergent theory designs into outbreak response.

Authors:  Janice E Graham; Shelley Lees; Frederic Le Marcis; Sylvain Landry Faye; Robert R Lorway; Maya Ronse; Sharon Abramowitz; Koen Peeters Grietens
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-08-10

Review 5.  Better Pandemic Influenza Preparedness through Adjuvant Technology Transfer: Challenges and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Céline H Lemoine; Reviany V Nidom; Roland Ventura; Setyarina Indrasari; Irine Normalina; Kuncoro Puguh Santoso; Francis Derouet; Christophe Barnier-Quer; Gerrit Borchard; Nicolas Collin; Chairul A Nidom
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-05

6.  A New World Health Era.

Authors:  Ariel Pablos-Méndez; Mario C Raviglione
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2018-03-30

7.  Building a global atlas of zoonotic viruses.

Authors:  Dennis Carroll; Brooke Watson; Eri Togami; Peter Daszak; Jonna Ak Mazet; Cara J Chrisman; Edward M Rubin; Nathan Wolfe; Carlos M Morel; George F Gao; Gian Luca Burci; Keiji Fukuda; Prasert Auewarakul; Oyewale Tomori
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Choices in vaccine trial design in epidemics of emerging infections.

Authors:  Rebecca Kahn; Annette Rid; Peter G Smith; Nir Eyal; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  After the pandemic: the role of science in the future of the countries.

Authors:  Ricardo Palacios; Dimas Tadeu Covas; Luiz Carlos Pereira Júnior; Sergio Cimerman
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2020 May - Jun       Impact factor: 1.949

Review 10.  Using cross-species vaccination approaches to counter emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  George M Warimwe; Michael J Francis; Thomas A Bowden; Samuel M Thumbi; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 53.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.