Literature DB >> 28108027

A postoperative scoring system for distant recurrence in node-positive cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection with para-aortic lymph node sampling or dissection.

Young-Jae Lee1, Dae-Yeon Kim2, Shin-Wha Lee1, Jeong-Yeol Park1, Dae-Shik Suh1, Jong-Hyeok Kim1, Yong-Man Kim1, Young-Tak Kim1, Joo-Hyun Nam1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for distant recurrence in node-positive cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with para-aortic lymph node sampling (PALNS) or para-aortic lymph node dissection (PALND).
METHODS: A total of 299 patients in whom lymph node metastasis was confirmed after radical surgery at Asan Medical Center for stage IA2 to IIB cervical cancer from February 2001 to December 2012 were identified. In all, 72 (24.1%) patients underwent PLND only and 227 (75.9%) underwent PLND with PALNS or PALND. Four patients were excluded due to diagnosed with small cell carcinoma. The clinicopathologic data of 223 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Distant recurrence was defined as recurrence at a site over the pelvic radiation field.
RESULTS: Among all 223 study patients, the mean number of positive lymph nodes was 4.46. There were 54 (24.2%) patients with distant metastasis. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that histologic types (HR=3.031, P≤0.001 for adenocarcinoma, HR=2.302, P=0.066 for adenosquamous carcinoma), number of positive lymph nodes (HR=1.077, P≤0.001), and surgical stage (HR=1.264, P=0.022) were independent risk factors for distant recurrence of cervical cancer. A scoring system for the prediction of distant recurrence was generated by incorporating these factors and showed good discrimination and calibration (concordance index of 0.753). In an internal validation set, this scoring system showed good discrimination with a C-statistics of 0.777. According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, the chi-square was 0.650 and the P-value was 0.723.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a robust scoring system that can predict the risk of distant recurrence in node-positive cervical cancer patients after radical operation. This scoring system was used to identify a group of patients who required systemic control of distant micrometastasis. This group of patients is an appropriate target for consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Copyright Â
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Consolidation chemotherapy; Lymphatic metastasis; Nomogram; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108027     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) - Part 1 with Recommendations on Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnostics and Therapy.

Authors:  Matthias W Beckmann; Frederik A Stübs; Martin C Koch; Peter Mallmann; Christian Dannecker; Anna Dietl; Anna Sevnina; Franziska Mergel; Laura Lotz; Carolin C Hack; Anne Ehret; Daniel Gantert; Franca Martignoni; Jan-Philipp Cieslik; Jan Menke; Olaf Ortmann; Carmen Stromberger; Karin Oechsle; Beate Hornemann; Friederike Mumm; Christoph Grimm; Alina Sturdza; Edward Wight; Kristina Loessl; Michael Golatta; Volker Hagen; Timm Dauelsberg; Ingo Diel; Karsten Münstedt; Eberhard Merz; Dirk Vordermark; Katja Lindel; Christian Wittekind; Volkmar Küppers; Ralph Lellé; Klaus Neis; Henrik Griesser; Birgit Pöschel; Manfred Steiner; Ulrich Freitag; Tobias Gilster; Alexander Schmittel; Michael Friedrich; Heidemarie Haase; Marion Gebhardt; Ludwig Kiesel; Michael Reinhardt; Michael Kreißl; Marianne Kloke; Lars-Christian Horn; Regina Wiedemann; Simone Marnitz; Anne Letsch; Isabella Zraik; Bernhard Mangold; Jochen Möckel; Céline Alt; Pauline Wimberger; Peter Hillemanns; Kerstin Paradies; Alexander Mustea; Dominik Denschlag; Ulla Henscher; Reina Tholen; Simone Wesselmann; Tanja Fehm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Populational trends and outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy for high-risk early-stage cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis: concurrent chemo-radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; David J Nusbaum; Hiroko Machida; Yongmei Huang; Varun Khetan; Shinya Matsuzaki; Maximilian Klar; Brendan H Grubbs; Lynda D Roman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Nomograms based on HPV load for predicting survival in cervical squamous cell carcinoma: An observational study with a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jing Zuo; Ying Huang; Jusheng An; Xi Yang; Ning Li; Manni Huang; Lingying Wu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Prediction of 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy using computational intelligence methods.

Authors:  Bogdan Obrzut; Maciej Kusy; Andrzej Semczuk; Marzanna Obrzut; Jacek Kluska
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Central Pathology Review in SENTIX, A Prospective Observational International Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (ENGOT-CX2).

Authors:  Kristyna Nemejcova; Roman Kocian; Christhardt Kohler; Jiri Jarkovsky; Jaroslav Klat; Alberto Berjon; Radovan Pilka; Borek Sehnal; Blanca Gil-Ibanez; Ezequiel Lupo; Almerinda Petiz; Octavio Arencibia Sanchez; Peter Kascak; Fabio Martinelli; Alessandro Buda; Jiri Presl; Marc Barahona; Luc van Lonkhuijzen; Wiktor Szatkowski; Lubos Minar; Maja Pakiz; Pavel Havelka; Cristina Zorrero; Marcin Misiek; Leon Cornelius Snyman; Dariusz Wydra; Ignace Vergote; Alla Vinnytska; Mikulas Redecha; Martin Michal; Solveig Tingulstad; Barbara Kipp; Grzegorz Szewczyk; Robert Toth; Francisco Javier de Santiago Garcia; Pluvio Jesus Coronado Martin; Robert Poka; Karl Tamussino; Mathieu Luyckx; Maxime Fastrez; Juan Carlos Staringer; Anna Germanova; Andrea Plaikner; Sylva Bajsova; Pavel Dundr; Nina Mallmann-Gottschalk; David Cibula
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Prediction of 10-year Overall Survival in Patients with Operable Cervical Cancer using a Probabilistic Neural Network.

Authors:  Bogdan Obrzut; Maciej Kusy; Andrzej Semczuk; Marzanna Obrzut; Jacek Kluska
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Preoperative SCC-Ag and thrombocytosis as predictive markers for pelvic lymphatic metastasis of squamous cervical cancer in early FIGO stage.

Authors:  Fan Xu; Yanfang Li; Liangsheng Fan; Jing Ma; Lan Yu; Hongyan Yi; Xiaojing Chen; Wenfei Wei; Peng Wu; Li Liang; Huiquan Hu; Hui Xing; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Factors predicting parametrial invasion in patients with early-stage cervical carcinomas.

Authors:  Heng-Cheng Hsu; Yi-Jou Tai; Yu-Li Chen; Ying-Cheng Chiang; Chi-An Chen; Wen-Fang Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cervical squamous cell carcinoma-secreted exosomal miR-221-3p promotes lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis by targeting VASH1.

Authors:  Chen-Fei Zhou; Jing Ma; Lei Huang; Hong-Yan Yi; Yan-Mei Zhang; Xiang-Guang Wu; Rui-Ming Yan; Li Liang; Mei Zhong; Yan-Hong Yu; Sha Wu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 8.756

10.  Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in patients with node-positive cervical squamous cell carcinoma following radical surgery.

Authors:  Qinhao Guo; Jun Zhu; Yong Wu; Hao Wen; Lingfang Xia; Min Yu; Simin Wang; Xingzhu Ju; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.