Literature DB >> 31678092

Populational trends and outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy for high-risk early-stage cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis: concurrent chemo-radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

Koji Matsuo1, David J Nusbaum2, Hiroko Machida3, Yongmei Huang4, Varun Khetan2, Shinya Matsuzaki2, Maximilian Klar5, Brendan H Grubbs6, Lynda D Roman7, Jason D Wright4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pelvic lymph node metastasis carries the highest impact on decreased survival among surgical-pathological risk factors for early-stage cervical cancer. Although concurrent administration of chemotherapy during postoperative radiotherapy is the current standard treatment for surgically treated high-risk early-stage cervical cancer, its effectiveness specific to node-positive disease has not been completely studied.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the use of concurrent chemotherapy and survival in women with early-stage cervical cancer and nodal metastasis receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 1988 to 2016. Women with stage T1-2 cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node metastasis who underwent hysterectomy and received postoperative radiotherapy were examined. Trends, characteristics, and overall survival were compared between women who received postoperative radiotherapy alone (n = 729) or in combination with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (n = 1809). Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for the effect of measured covariates on treatment selection.
RESULTS: Among 2538 women, there was a marked increase in the use of concurrent chemotherapy from 1997 to 2000 (20.7% to 78.5%, P = .052), followed by a more gradual rise through 2016 (88.3%, P < .001). In a multivariable model, women with non-squamous cell carcinomas and those diagnosed more recently were more likely to receive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, whereas older women were less likely to receive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (all, P < .05). At the population level, the 5-year overall survival rates remained unchanged (annual percent change for 1997-2012: -0.1; 95% confidence interval, -1.2 to 1.0; P = .776). In a propensity score weighted cohort, women who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy had a 5-year overall survival rate similar to women treated with radiotherapy alone (73.1% vs 73.6%; hazard ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 0.887-1.136; P = .955). Significant differences were also not seen in older women, nonsquamous types, stage T2 disease, and multiple node metastases (all, P > .05).
CONCLUSION: Despite the marked increase in the use of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for women with early-stage cervical cancer and nodal metastases, there was no association between use of concurrent chemotherapy during postoperative radiotherapy and improved survival.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant therapy; concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, cervical cancer; high risk; lymph node metastasis; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31678092      PMCID: PMC7523229          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  30 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model.

Authors:  D W Hosmer; T Hosmer; S Le Cessie; S Lemeshow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Comparative effectiveness research in oncology methodology: observational data.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A randomized trial of standard versus partially hyperfractionated radiation with or without concurrent 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  G Thomas; A Dembo; I Ackerman; E Franssen; J Balogh; A Fyles; W Levin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Comparison of adjuvant therapy for node-positive clinical stage IB-IIB cervical cancer: Systemic chemotherapy versus pelvic irradiation.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Muneaki Shimada; Yoichi Aoki; Masaru Sakamoto; Nobuhiro Takeshima; Hisaya Fujiwara; Takashi Matsumoto; Mikio Mikami; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  C W Whitney; W Sause; B N Bundy; J H Malfetano; E V Hannigan; W C Fowler; D L Clarke-Pearson; S Y Liao
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  A Sedlis; B N Bundy; M Z Rotman; S S Lentz; L I Muderspach; R J Zaino
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2017 for the treatment of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Ebina; Mikio Mikami; Satoru Nagase; Tsutomu Tabata; Masanori Kaneuchi; Hironori Tashiro; Masaki Mandai; Takayuki Enomoto; Yoichi Kobayashi; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Nobuo Yaegashi; Yasuhiro Udagawa; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Risk stratification models for para-aortic lymph node metastasis and recurrence in stage IB-IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Muneaki Shimada; Tsuyoshi Saito; Kazuhiro Takehara; Hideki Tokunaga; Yoh Watanabe; Yukiharu Todo; Ken Ichirou Morishige; Mikio Mikami; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Utility of risk-weighted surgical-pathological factors in early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  K Matsuo; S Mabuchi; M Okazawa; Y Matsumoto; T Tsutsui; M Fujita; S Kamiura; K Ogawa; C P Morrow; T Kimura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  7 in total

1.  Angiopoietin-1 is associated with a decreased risk of lymph node metastasis in early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Cai; Dongyun Yang; Yifan Zhang; Jing Cai; Si Sun; Ping Yang; Yuhui Huang; Qing Han; Zhoufang Xiong; Shaohai Wang
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Survival impact of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IIIC1 cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Suzuki; Shoji Nagao; Moyu Narita; Hiroshi Nakazawa; Takashi Shibutani; Kasumi Yamamoto; Tomoatsu Jimi; Hiroko Yano; Miho Kitai; Takaya Shiozaki; Kazuko Matsuoka; Satoshi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Wait-time for hysterectomy and survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: A clinical implication during the coronavirus pandemic.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Hilary Novatt; Shinya Matsuzaki; Marianne S Hom; Antonio V Castaneda; Ernesto Licon; David J Nusbaum; Lynda D Roman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  The trend and outcome of postsurgical therapy for high-risk early-stage cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis in Japan: a report from the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guidelines evaluation committee.

Authors:  Masae Ikeda; Masako Shida; Shogo Shigeta; Satoru Nagase; Fumiaki Takahashi; Wataru Yamagami; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Nobuo Yaegashi; Daisuke Aoki; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  The Combination of T Stage and the Number of Pathologic Lymph Nodes Provides Better Prognostic Discrimination in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer With Lymph Node Involvement.

Authors:  Yongrui Bai; Ling Rong; Bin Hu; Xiumei Ma; Jiahui Wang; Haiyan Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Fengying Qin; Huiting Pang; Tao Yu; Yahong Luo; Yue Dong
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

7.  Survival, treatment pattern, and treatment outcome in patients with cervical cancer metastatic to distant lymph nodes.

Authors:  Haoliang Lin; Dongyan Wang; Hui Li; Chuling Wu; Fengqian Zhang; Zhongqiu Lin; Tingting Yao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.