| Literature DB >> 28107379 |
Charles O Nwuche1,2, Oguejiofo T Ujam3, Akachukwu Ibezim4, Ifeoma B Ujam5.
Abstract
The Antibiogram properties of 1-chloro-2-isocyanatoethane derivatives of thiomorpholine (CTC), piperazine (CPC) and morpholine (CMC) were evaluated by the approved agar well diffusion, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and in silico techniques. A total of fourteen microbial cultures consisting of ten bacteria and four yeast strains were used in the biological study while affinity of the compounds for DNA gyrase, a validated antibacterial drug target, was investigated by docking method. Results indicate that both thiomorpholine and piperazine had zero activity against the Gram negative organisms tested. With morpholine, similar result was obtained except that cultures of Escherichia coli (ATCC 15442) and Salmonella typhi (ATCC 6539) presented with weak sensitivity (7-8 mm) as shown by the inhibition zone diameter (IZD) measurement. The Gram positive organisms were more sensitive to morpholine than the other compounds. The highest IZD values of 15-18 mm were achieved except for Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619) in which mobility of the compound stopped after 12 mm. S. pneumoniae was resistant to both thiomorpholine and piperazine. The yeast strains were not sensitive to any of the studied compounds investigated. The MIC tests evaluated against a reference antibiotic show that while morpholine was most active at 4 μg.ml-1 against both B. cereus ATCC (14579) and B. subtilis, the least active compound was thiomorpholine which inhibited S. aureus (ATCC 25923) at 64 μg.ml-1. The three compounds demonstrated high affinity for the target protein (DNA gyrase) ranging from -4.63 to -5.64 Kcal/mol and even showed better ligand efficiencies than three known antibiotics; chlorobiocin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. This study identified the studied compounds as potential antibiotic leads with acceptable physicochemical properties and gave the molecular basis for the observed interactions between the compounds and the target protein which can be harnessed in structural optimization process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28107379 PMCID: PMC5249067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Synthesis of hiomorpholine piperazine and and morpholine derivatives of 1-chloro-2-isocyanatoethane.
Inhibition zone diameter (IZD) of the effect of CTC, CPC and CMC on the test isolates.
| Test Microorganism | CTC | CPC | CMC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gram -ve | |||
| - | - | 7 | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | 8 | |
| - | - | - | |
| Gram +ve | |||
| 10 | 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 11 | 18 | |
| - | - | 12 | |
| 12 | 14 | 16 | |
| Yeast | |||
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - |
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, μg.ml-1) of the effect of compounds.
| Test Microorganisms | CTC | CPC | CMC | Tetracycline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 32 | 8 | 32 | |
| 16 | 16 | 4 | 64 | |
| – | – | 32 | 128 | |
| 32 | 8 | 4 | 64 |
ND: Not Detected.
Fig 2Poses of the x-ray structure of cocrystallized ligand (in red) and the docked ligand (in green).
In-silico inhibitory potential of the three compounds against DNA gyrase.
| Compound | ΔG (Kcal/mol) | Ligand efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTC | -4.81 | 299.73 | 0.4 |
| CPC | -5.64 | 73.47 | 0.31 |
| CMC | -4.63 | 404.53 | 0.39 |
| Chlorobiocin | -4.55 | 465.26 | 0.09 |
| Ciprofloxacin | -6.96 | 7.95 | 0.29 |
| Tetracycline | -4.64 | 397.29 | 0.14 |
Physicochemical properties used to assess oral bioavailability of drug.
| Compounds | NRB | MW | HBA | HBD | lip_violation | log | Log | TPSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTC | 4 | 208.71 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -1.40 | 0.14 | 32.34 |
| CPC | 8 | 297.19 | 6 | 2 | 0 | -1.08 | -0.77 | 64.68 |
| CMC | 4 | 192.65 | 4 | 1 | 0 | -0.56 | -0.50 | 41.57 |
Fig 3Binding conformations of the compounds (a) CTC, (b) CPC, (c) CMC and (d) is the solid surface representation of the protein binding site with all the three compounds in it.
For subfigures a, b and c; the protein residues and ligands are in line and stick representations respectively. The atoms are in their standard colors for both the protein residues and ligands i.e. oxygen atom is in red color, chlorine atom in green color, hydrogen atom in white color, sulphur atom in yellow color etc. Polar contacts are shown in dash lines.
Fig 4Binding conformations of the (a) native ligand (chlorobiocin) and (b) ciprofloxacin showing interactions with DNA gyrase active site residues similar to those observed in Fig 2a, 2b and 2c.