Literature DB >> 28106904

Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term.

Catherine Cluver1, Natalia Novikova2, Corine M Koopmans3, Helen M West4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are significant contributors to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. These disorders include well-controlled chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension (pregnancy-induced hypertension) and mild pre-eclampsia. The definitive treatment for these disorders is planned early delivery and the alternative is to manage the pregnancy expectantly if severe uncontrolled hypertension is not present, with close maternal and fetal monitoring. There are benefits and risks associated with both, so it is important to establish the safest option.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and risks of a policy of planned early delivery versus a policy of expectant management in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders, at or near term (from 34 weeks onwards). SEARCH
METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Trials Register (12 January 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of a policy of planned early delivery (by induction of labour or by caesarean section) compared with a policy of delayed delivery ("expectant management") for women with hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks' gestation. Cluster-randomised trials would have been eligible for inclusion in this review, but we found none.Studies using a quasi-randomised design are not eligible for inclusion in this review. Similarly, studies using a cross-over design are not eligible for inclusion, because they are not a suitable study design for investigating hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and risks of bias. Two review authors independently extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN
RESULTS: We included five studies (involving 1819 women) in this review.There was a lower risk of composite maternal mortality and severe morbidity for women randomised to receive planned early delivery (risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.83, two studies, 1459 women (evidence graded high)). There were no clear differences between subgroups based on our subgroup analysis by gestational age, gestational week or condition. Planned early delivery was associated with lower risk of HELLP syndrome (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.93, 1628 women; three studies) and severe renal impairment (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.92, 100 women, one study).There was not enough information to draw any conclusions about the effects on composite infant mortality and severe morbidity. We observed a high level of heterogeneity between the two studies in this analysis (two studies, 1459 infants, I2 = 87%, Tau2 = 0.98), so we did not pool data in meta-analysis. There were no clear differences between subgroups based on our subgroup analysis by gestational age, gestational week or condition. Planned early delivery was associated with higher levels of respiratory distress syndrome (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.18, three studies, 1511 infants), and NICU admission (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.40, four studies, 1585 infants).There was no clear difference between groups for caesarean section (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.07, 1728 women, four studies, evidence graded moderate), or in the duration of hospital stay for the mother after delivery of the baby (mean difference (MD) -0.16 days, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.15, two studies, 925 women, evidence graded moderate) or for the baby (MD -0.20 days, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.17, one study, 756 infants, evidence graded moderate).Two fairly large, well-designed trials with overall low risk of bias contributed the majority of the evidence. Other studies were at low or unclear risk of bias. No studies attempted to blind participants or clinicians to group allocation, potentially introducing bias as women and staff would have been aware of the intervention and this may have affected aspects of care and decision-making.The level of evidence was graded high (composite maternal mortality and morbidity), moderate (caesarean section, duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother, and duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby) or low (composite infant mortality and morbidity). Where the evidence was downgraded, it was mostly because the confidence intervals were wide, crossing both the line of no effect and appreciable benefit or harm. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: For women suffering from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy after 34 weeks, planned early delivery is associated with less composite maternal morbidity and mortality. There is no clear difference in the composite outcome of infant mortality and severe morbidity; however, this is based on limited data (from two trials) assessing all hypertensive disorders as one group.Further studies are needed to look at the different types of hypertensive diseases and the optimal timing of delivery for these conditions. These studies should also include infant and maternal morbidity and mortality outcomes, caesarean section, duration of hospital stay after delivery for mother and duration of hospital stay after delivery for baby.An individual patient meta-analysis on the data currently available would provide further information on the outcomes of the different types of hypertensive disease encountered in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28106904      PMCID: PMC6465052          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  35 in total

1.  Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term.

Authors:  A S Maslow; A L Sweeny
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Mild gestational hypertension remote from term: progression and outcome.

Authors:  J R Barton; J M O'brien; N K Bergauer; D L Jacques; B M Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Baha Sibai; Gus Dekker; Michael Kupferminc
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Feb 26-Mar 4       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khalid S Khan; Daniel Wojdyla; Lale Say; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Paul Fa Van Look
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Predicting transformation from gestational hypertension to preeclampsia in clinical practice: a possible role for 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Gregory K Davis; Callie Mackenzie; Mark A Brown; Caroline S Homer; Jane Holt; Lisa McHugh; George Mangos
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.108

6.  Clinical outcomes of near-term infants.

Authors:  Marvin L Wang; David J Dorer; Michael P Fleming; Elizabeth A Catlin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Yinglei Lai; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparison of emergency caesarean section to misoprostol induction for the delivery of antepartum eclamptic patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Tukur; N I Umar; N Khan; D Musa
Journal:  Niger J Med       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec

9.  RETIRED: Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Authors:  Laura A Magee; Michael Helewa; Evelyne Rey
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-03

10.  Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial.

Authors:  Corine M Koopmans; Denise Bijlenga; Jan G Aarnoudse; Erik van Beek; Dick J Bekedam; Paul P van den Berg; Jan M Burggraaff; Erwin Birnie; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Addi P Drogtrop; Arie Franx; Christianne J M de Groot; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Anneke Kwee; Saskia le Cessie; Aren J van Loon; Ben W J Mol; Joris A M van der Post; Frans J M E Roumen; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Marc E A Spaanderman; Rob H Stigter; Christine Willekes; Maria G van Pampus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  13 in total

1.  Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

2.  Performance indices of AmnioQuick Duo+ versus placental α-microglobulin-1 tests for women with prolonged premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  George U Eleje; Euzebus C Ezugwu; Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Nnabuike O Ojiegbe; Richard O Egeonu; Chukwudi C Obiora; Chigozie G Okafor; Joseph I Ikechebelu; Ahizechukwu C Eke
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.447

3.  Delivery or expectant management for prevention of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  T P Bernardes; E F Zwertbroek; K Broekhuijsen; C Koopmans; K Boers; M Owens; J Thornton; M G van Pampus; S A Scherjon; K Wallace; J Langenveld; P P van den Berg; M T M Franssen; B W J Mol; H Groen
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Recent advances in the induction of labor.

Authors:  Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-30

5.  A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.

Authors:  Dominiek Coates; Angela Makris; Christine Catling; Amanda Henry; Vanessa Scarf; Nicole Watts; Deborah Fox; Purshaiyna Thirukumar; Vincent Wong; Hamish Russell; Caroline Homer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Diana M Bond; Adrienne Gordon; Jon Hyett; Bradley de Vries; Angela E Carberry; Jonathan Morris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-24

7.  The risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction among women with prior pregnancy complications: a subgroup analysis of the AFFIRM study.

Authors:  Leslie Skeith; Grégoire Le Gal; Johanna I P de Vries; Saskia Middeldorp; Mariëtte Goddijn; Risto Kaaja; Jean-Christophe Gris; Ida Martinelli; Ekkehard Schleußner; David Petroff; Nicole Langlois; Marc A Rodger
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucy C Chappell; Peter Brocklehurst; Marcus E Green; Rachael Hunter; Pollyanna Hardy; Edmund Juszczak; Louise Linsell; Virginia Chiocchia; Melanie Greenland; Anna Placzek; John Townend; Neil Marlow; Jane Sandall; Andrew Shennan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Blood pressure change across pregnancy in white British and Pakistani women: analysis of data from the Born in Bradford cohort.

Authors:  Diane Farrar; Gillian Santorelli; Debbie A Lawlor; Derek Tuffnell; Trevor A Sheldon; Jane West; Corrie Macdonald-Wallis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Incidences of obstetric outcomes and sample size calculations: A Danish national registry study based on all deliveries from 2008 to 2015.

Authors:  Stinne Hoegh; Line Thellesen; Karl Bang Christensen; Thomas Bergholt; Morten Hedegaard; Jette Led Sorensen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.