| Literature DB >> 28106735 |
Hye Min Park1, Kab-Tae Park2, Edmond Changkyun Park3,4, Seung Ii Kim5,6, Myung Sook Choi7, Kwang-Hyeon Liu8, Choong Hwan Lee9.
Abstract
We aimed to identify metabolites involved in the anti-obesity effects of Platycodon grandiflorum (PG) in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice using mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomic techniques. C57BL/6J mice were divided into four groups: normal diet (ND)-fed mice, HFD-fed mice, HFD with 1% PG extract-fed mice (HPGL), and HFD with 5% PG extract-fed mice (HPGH). After 8 weeks, the HFD group gained more weight than the ND group, while dietary 5% PG extract attenuated this change. The partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plots showed a clear distinction between experimental groups in serum and liver markers. We also identified 10 and 32 metabolites in the serum and liver, respectively, as potential biomarkers that could explain the effect of high-dose PG added to HFD-fed mice, which were strongly involved in amino acid metabolism (glycine, serine, threonine, methionine, glutamate, phenylalanine, ornithine, lysine, and tyrosine), TCA cycle (fumarate and succinate), lipid metabolism (linoleic and oleic acid methyl esters, oleamide, and cholesterol), purine/pyrimidine metabolism (uracil and hypoxanthine), carbohydrate metabolism (maltose), and glycerophospholipid metabolism (phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, lysophosphatidylcholines, and lysophosphatidylethanolamines). We suggest that further studies on these metabolites could help us gain a better understanding of both HFD-induced obesity and the effects of PG.Entities:
Keywords: Platycodon grandiflorum; amino acids; glycerophospholipids; high-fat diet; metabolite profiling; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28106735 PMCID: PMC5295115 DOI: 10.3390/nu9010071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Characteristics of mice fed a Normal Diet (ND), a High-Fat Diet (HFD), HFD with 1% Platycodon grandiflorum (PG) extract (HPGL), and HFD with 5% PG extract (HPGH).
| Weight (g) | ND | HFD | HPGL | HPGH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body | 31 ± 4 a | 49 ± 1 b | 43 ± 3 b | 32 ± 3 a |
| Liver | 1 ± 0.2 a | 2 ± 0.9 b | 2 ± 0.1 b | 1 ± 0.1 a |
| Subcutaneous fat | 1 ± 0.4 a | 5 ± 2 b | 5 ± 0.6 b | 2 ± 1 a |
| Visceral fat | 1 ± 0.4 a | 3 ± 0.7 c | 4 ± 0.4 c | 2 ± 1 b |
The data were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Means with different letters, e.g., “a” or “b” are statistically different. Differences were considered significant at p values < 0.05.
Biochemical serum parameters of mice fed a Normal Diet (ND), a High-Fat Diet (HFD), HFD with 1% Platycodon grandiflorum (PG) extract (HPGL), and HFD with 5% PG extract (HPGH).
| Parameters | ND | HFD | HPGL | HPGH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | 159 ± 90 a | 254 ± 96 b | 199 ± 70 a,b | 175 ± 50 a,b |
| ALT (U/L) | 39 ± 19 a | 201 ± 133 b | 187 ± 92 b | 35 ± 20 a |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 141 ± 18 a | 264 ± 62 b | 254 ± 25 b | 195 ± 51 c |
The data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Means with different letters, e.g., “a” or “b” are statistically different. Differences were considered significant at p values < 0.05.
Figure 1Effects of Platycodon grandiflorum (PG) extracts on Hepatic Morphology in a High-fat Diet-fed C57BL-6J. (A) ND, normal diet; (B) HFD, high-fat diet; (C) HPGL, high-fat diet with 1% P. grandiflorum; (D) HPGH, high-fat diet with 5% P. grandiflorum. Liver tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The stained slices were examined under an optical microscope at a 200-fold magnification.
List of potential serum biomarkers in mice fed a High-Fat Diet (HFD) including 5% Platycodon grandiflorum using various MS analyses.
| No. | Metabolite | Fold Change 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFD/ND | HPGL/HFD | HPGH/HFD | ||
| 1 | Ornithine | 1.38 # | 0.76 # | 0.72 # |
| 2 | Tryptophan | 1.26 # | 0.85 # | 0.78 # |
| 3 | Saccharide * | 1.67 # | 0.92 | 0.79 # |
| 4 | LysoPC 20:4 | 1.65 # | 0.98 | 0.66 # |
| 5 | PC 34:2 (16:0/18:2) | 0.55 # | 0.88 | 1.39 # |
| 6 | PC 36:4 (16:0/20:4) | 1.50 # | 1.11 | 0.71 # |
| 7 | PC 38:4 (18:0/20:4) | 2.28 # | 1.01 | 0.60 # |
| 8 | PC 38:3 (18:0/20:3) | 2.07 # | 1.00 | 0.65 # |
| 9 | PC 38:3 | 1.29 # | 1.07 | 0.77 # |
| 10 | TG 52:3 | 0.53 # | 0.66 | 2.06 # |
ND, group fed with a normal diet; HFD, group fed with a high-fat diet; HPGL, group fed with a high-fat diet and 1% P. grandiflorum; HPGH, group fed with a high-fat diet and 5% P. grandiflorum. 1 Fold change was calculated by dividing the mean of the peak intensity of each metabolite from each of the two groups. * Saccharide was not successfully identified, but its mass fragments were similar to general mass fragments of saccharides in GC-TOF-MS analysis. # Metabolites showing significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups as determined by Student’s t-test.
Figure 2Three dimensional (3D) PLS-DA score plots derived from GC-TOF-MS (A,C) and UPLC-Q-TOF-MS (B,D) data sets in negative ion mode for MW (A,B) and DM (C,D) extracts, and direct infusion nanoelectrospray-MS data set (E) of liver in mice fed a High-Fat Diet (HFD) including Platycodon grandiflorum. Black square ND, normal diet; red square HFD, high-fat diet; orange square HPGL, high-fat diet with 1% P. grandiflorum; brown square HPGH, high-fat diet with 5% P. grandiflorum.
List of potential hepatic biomarkers in mice fed a High-Fat Diet (HFD) including 5% Platycodon grandiflorum using various MS analyses.
| No. | Metabolite | Fold Change 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFD/ND | HPGL/HFD | HPGH/HFD | ||
| 1 | Glycine | 0.57 # | 1.27 # | 1.18 # |
| 2 | Serine | 0.50 # | 1.21 | 1.34 # |
| 3 | Threonine | 0.51 # | 1.25 | 1.37 # |
| 4 | Methionine a | 0.31 # | 1.25 | 2.38 # |
| 5 | Glutamic acid | 0.45 # | 1.42 | 1.71 # |
| 6 | Phenylalanine a | 0.39 # | 1.19 | 2.40 # |
| 7 | Ornithine | 0.44 # | 1.26 | 1.67 # |
| 8 | Lysine a | 0.39 # | 1.63 # | 2.98 # |
| 9 | Tyrosine a | 0.42 # | 1.24 | 2.47 # |
| 10 | Urea | 0.71 # | 1.15 | 1.15 # |
| 11 | Succinic acid | 0.42 # | 1.11 | 1.75 # |
| 12 | Fumaric acid a | 0.34 # | 1.67 | 2.96 # |
| 13 | Linolelidic acid methyl ester a | 1.53 # | 0.85 # | 0.54 # |
| 14 | Oleic acid methyl ester a | 2.45 # | 1.56 # | 0.54 # |
| 15 | Oleamide a | 1.21 # | 0.90 | 0.72 # |
| 16 | Cholesterol | 0.24 # | 1.97 # | 2.82 # |
| 17 | Maltose | 12.33 # | 0.75 | 0.83 # |
| 18 | Uracil a | 0.40 # | 1.75 # | 2.81 # |
| 19 | Hypoxanthine | 0.33 # | 1.18 | 1.53 # |
| 20 | LysoPC 22:6 | 4.12 # | 0.51 # | 0.58 # |
| 21 | LysoPC 20:4 | 5.88 # | 0.50 # | 0.48 # |
| 22 | LysoPC 22:6 | 1.72 # | 0.86 # | 0.78 # |
| 23 | LysoPE 18:2 a | 0.21 # | 1.11 | 2.25 # |
| 24 | LysoPC 20:4 | 2.50 # | 0.79 # | 0.67 # |
| 25 | LysoPC 18:2 a | 0.50 # | 1.01 | 1.53 # |
| 26 | LysoPC 18:2 | 0.45 # | 1.25 | 2.32 # |
| 27a | LysoPC 16:0 a | 0.64 # | 1.70 # | 1.39 # |
| 27b | LysoPC 20:3 | 3.44 # | 0.79 | 0.64 # |
| 28 | LysoPE 18:0 | 0.23 # | 5.76 # | 3.06 # |
| 29 | PE 36:3 | 0.51 # | 0.89 | 1.78 # |
| 30 | PE 36:2 | 0.42 # | 0.90 | 2.22 # |
| 31 | PC 38:9 | 1.79 # | 0.92 | 0.60 # |
| 32 | TG 50:2 | 2.52 # | 0.78 | 0.45 # |
ND, group fed with a normal diet; HFD, group fed with a high-fat diet; HPGL, group fed with a high-fat diet and 1% P. grandiflorum; HPGH, group fed with a high-fat diet and 5% P. grandiflorum. 1 Fold change was calculated by dividing the mean of the peak intensity of each metabolite from each of the two groups. a Metabolites were only selected in DM extracts of liver tissues. # Metabolites showing significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups as determined by Student’s t-test. LysoPC 18:2 was selected in both UPLC-Q-TOF-MS analysis (No. 25a) and direct infusion MS analysis (No. 25b).
Figure 3Proposed metabolic pathway derived from the metabolites significantly altered in liver tissues depending on the administration of Platycodon grandiflorum to High-Fat Diet (HFD)-induced obese mice. In the histograms, the peak intensity was plotted on the y-axis, while the different experimental groups were plotted on the x-axis. Black square ND, group fed with a normal diet; red square HFD, group fed with a high-fat diet; orange square HPGL, group fed with a high-fat diet and 1% P. grandiflorum; brown square HPGH, group fed with a high-fat diet and 5% P. grandiflorum.