Literature DB >> 28106237

Reading and quality of life differences between Tecnis ZCB00 monofocal and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lenses.

Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal1,2, Paula Talavero1,2, Galadriel Giménez1,2, Irene Altemir1,2, José M Larrosa1,2, Vicente Polo1,2, Luis E Pablo1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the NEI-RQL-42 quality of life questionnaire and the Radner Vissum reading test outcomes after bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of Tecnis ZCB00 monofocal and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lens (IOL).
METHODS: Forty-two eyes of 21 patients who had phacoemulsification were implanted with Tecnis ZCB00 IOL and 82 eyes of 41 patients were implanted with Tecnis ZMB00 IOL. They answered the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire before cataract surgery and 3 months after it. The Radner Vissum test was performed 3 months after the surgery with optical correction for near vision in patients with monofocal IOL, but without it in patients with multifocal IOL.
RESULTS: Regarding the NEI-RQL-42 test, the multifocal group obtained better results in items 2, 7, 8, 11, 13, 31, and 40, and in the following categories: near vision, dependence on correction, and suboptimal correction (p<0.05). The monofocal group only showed better results in item 17. As for the Radner Vissum test, the multifocal group obtained significantly better results in phrases 1, 3, 4, and 5, and in the number of incorrect syllables (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal IOL report a higher quality of life regarding the lack of need for optical correction for near vision in their daily activities, but halos in vision at night. Additionally, patients with multifocal IOL achieve similar or better reading quality at near vision and under photopic lighting conditions than patients with monofocal IOL with near vision optical correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28106237     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of visual outcomes after two types of mix-and-match implanted trifocal extended-depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Jung Wan Kim; Youngsub Eom; Wonkyung Park; Jong Suk Song; Ji Won Jeong; Seh Kwang Park; Hyo Myung Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Visual performance in a flight simulator: multifocal intraocular lenses in pilots.

Authors:  Lee Lenton
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-04

3.  Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics.

Authors:  André Lins de Medeiros; Flavio Jones Saraiva; Camila Ishii Iguma; Danilo Varela Kniggendorf; Guilherme Alves; Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Cesar Vilar; Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Celso Takashi Nakano; Walton Nosé; Wilson Takashi Hida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-29

4.  Preliminary Clinical Outcomes of a New Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Nuno Campos; Tomás Loureiro; Sandra Rodrigues-Barros; Ana Rita Carreira; Filipe Moraes; Pedro Carreira; Inês Machado
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-24

5.  Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  André Lins de Medeiros; André Gustavo de Araújo Rolim; Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Bruna Vieira Ventura; César Vilar; Mário Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Wilson Takashi Hida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-26

6.  Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Echelette Extended Range of Vision and Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Xiaohui Song; Wei Wang; Yanan Zhu; Danni Lyu; Xingchao Shentu; Peiqing Chen; Yibo Yu; Ke Yao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.