Literature DB >> 28105553

Does CA 19-9 Have Prognostic Relevance in Gallbladder Carcinoma (GBC)?

Sushma Agrawal1, Able Lawrence2, Rajan Saxena3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a scarce data on prognostic relevance of carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9). This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate its prognostic relevance in different prognostic subsets of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-one patients of GBC treated between January 2012 and December 2014 were the subjects of this retrospective analysis. Baseline CA 19-9 levels of four cohorts of patients: extended cholecystectomy (EC), simple cholecystectomy (SC) with residual or recurrent disease, locally advanced disease (LAGBC) and metastatic disease were ascertained. The difference in its median baseline values among above groups was ascertained. The effect of clinicopathological variables, treatment-related variables and CA 19-9 on overall survival (OS) was also evaluated. AUC curve was computed to evaluate its performance.
RESULTS: The median baseline levels of CA 19-9 were significantly different [10 units/ml, 24 units/ml, 48 units/ml and 75 units/ml in EC (n = 33), SC (n = 21), LAGBC (n = 38) and metastatic disease (n = 49), respectively, (p value 0.001)]. The median OS was also significantly different [24, 15, 7 and 6 months in EC, SC, LAGBC and metastatic disease, respectively, (p value 0.001)]. Univariate analysis revealed a significant influence of log transformed value of CA 19-9, CA 19-9 levels < or >20 units or 35 units, surgery vs. none and chemoradiation vs. chemotherapy on OS. On multivariate analysis, only treatment-related variables were significant (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.026-1.19, p = 0.009). AUC curve was 0.63 for all patients and 0.72 for EC group.
CONCLUSIONS: The median values of baseline CA 19-9 predict the burden of disease. Raised levels of serum CA 19-9 beyond 20 units/ml should be used for prognostication purposes after EC. A level beyond 35 units has a trend towards prognostication in other prognostic groups and needs to be evaluated in large subset of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA 19-9; Gallbladder cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28105553     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9914-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  8 in total

1.  Factors influencing survival outcome for radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Hirobumi Oikawa; Hiroshi Onishi; Nobue Uchida; Toshiya Maebayashi; Naoto Kanesaka; Tetsuro Tamamoto; Hirofumi Asakura; Takashi Kosugi; Kazuo Hatano; Michio Yoshimura; Kazunari Yamada; Sunao Tokumaru; Kenji Sekiguchi; Masao Kobayashi; Toshinori Soejima; Fumiaki Isohashi; Kenji Nemoto; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Evaluation of CA 242 as a tumor marker in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Surinder Rana; Usha Dutta; Rakesh Kochhar; Satyavati V Rana; Rajesh Gupta; Ravinder Pal; Kapil Jain; Radhika Srinivasan; Birender Nagi; Chander Kant Nain; Kartar Singh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-06

3.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Preoperative prediction of survival in resectable gallbladder cancer by a combined utilization of CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen.

Authors:  Tunan Yu; Hong Yu; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in pancreatic cancer. Role of age and liver dysfunction.

Authors:  G Del Favero; C Fabris; A Panucci; D Basso; M Plebani; U Baccaglini; G Leandro; A Burlina; R Naccarato
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.276

6.  Gallbladder adenocarcinoma: evaluation of the prognostic factors in 100 resectable cases in Brazil.

Authors:  Sergio Renato Pais-Costa; José Francisco de Matos Farah; Ricardo Artigiani-Neto; Maria Isete Fares Franco; Sandro José Martins; Alberto Goldenberg
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

7.  Prognostic relevance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Jan Harder; Oliver Kummer; Manfred Olschewski; Florian Otto; Hubert Erich Blum; Oliver Opitz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Diagnostic value of serum CA242, CA 19-9, CA 15-3 and CA 125 in patients with carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Vijay K Shukla; Deborshi Sharma; V K Dixit
Journal:  Trop Gastroenterol       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) as adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II and stage III gallbladder cancers (GBC): a potential way forward.

Authors:  Vikas Ostwal; Rohit Swami; Shraddha Patkar; Swaratika Majumdar; Mahesh Goel; Shaesta Mehta; Reena Engineer; Sarika Mandavkar; Suman Kumar; Anant Ramaswamy
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Gallbladder Cancer Patients With Recurrence After Surgery.

Authors:  Mingyu Chen; Shijie Li; Win Topatana; Xiaozhong Lv; Jiasheng Cao; Jiahao Hu; Jian Lin; Sarun Juengpanich; Jiliang Shen; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram Based on the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Resectable Gallbladder Cancer to Predict Survival and Chemotherapy Benefit.

Authors:  Lin Li; Tai Ren; Ke Liu; Mao-Lan Li; Ya-Jun Geng; Yang Yang; Huai-Feng Li; Xue-Chuan Li; Run-Fa Bao; Yi-Jun Shu; Hao Weng; Wei Gong; Wan Yee Lau; Xiang-Song Wu; Ying-Bin Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Raised CA19-9 and CEA have prognostic relevance in gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashish Sachan; Sundeep Singh Saluja; Phani Kumar Nekarakanti; Bhawna Mahajan; Hirdaya H Nag; Pramod K Mishra
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Prognostic Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in Gallbladder Cancer; 65 IU/mL of CA 19-9 Is the New Cut-Off Value for Prognosis.

Authors:  Myongjin Kim; Hongbeom Kim; Youngmin Han; Heeju Sohn; Jae Seung Kang; Wooil Kwon; Jin-Young Jang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.