Literature DB >> 28105216

Identification of potential therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer by bioinformatics analysis.

Ming Yan1, Maomin Song1, Rixing Bai1, Shi Cheng1, Wenmao Yan1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify potential therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer (CRC). The gene expression profile GSE32323, containing 34 samples, including 17 specimens of CRC tissues and 17 of paired normal tissues from CRC patients, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Following data preprocessing using the Affy and preprocessCore packages, the differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between the two types of samples were identified with the Linear Models for Microarray Analysis package. Next, functional and pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs was performed using the Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was established using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes database. Utilizing WebGestalt, the potential microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) of the DEGs were screened and the integrated miRNA-target network was built. A cohort of 1,347 DEGs was identified, the majority of which were mainly enriched in cell cycle-related biological processes and pathways. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), cyclin B1 (CCNB1), MAD2 mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (MAD2L1) and BUB1 mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase B (BUB1B) were prominent in the PPI network, while the over-represented genes in the integrated miRNA-target network were SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 4 (SOX4; targeted by hsa-mir-129), v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC; targeted by hsa-let-7c and hsa-mir-145) and cyclin D1 (CCND1; targeted by hsa-let-7b). CDK1, CCNB1 and CCND1 were also associated with the p53 signaling pathway. Overall, several genes associated with the cell cycle and p53 pathway were identified as biomarkers for CRC. CDK1, CCNB1, MAD2L1, BUB1B, SOX4, collagen type I α2 chain and MYC may play significant roles in CRC progression by affecting the cell cycle-related pathways, while CDK1, CCNB1 and CCND1 may serve as crucial regulators in the p53 signaling pathway. Furthermore, SOX4, MYC and CCND1 may be targets of miR-129, hsa-mir-145 and hsa-let-7c, respectively. However, further validation of these data is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell cycle; colorectal cancer; differentially-expressed gene; miRNA-target network; p53 pathway; protein-protein interaction network

Year:  2016        PMID: 28105216      PMCID: PMC5228398          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates (1). Annually, the global incidence of CRC is estimated to be ~1 million, with ~500,000 mortalities (2). Obesity, smoking, diet and a lack of exercise are risk factors associated with CRC (3). Despite advanced detection approaches, including colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing in early stage and precancerous lesions (4), the incidence of CRC remains high. In a previous study, in the United States in 2014, a cohort of 136,830 individuals was estimated to be diagnosed with CRC and 50,310 patient (36.8%) succumbed (5). In China, rapidly increasing incidence and mortality rates of CRC have been detected in past decades (6). Therefore, extensive studies have been conducted to investigate more effective biological therapies for CRC management. The accumulation of mutations in a large number of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, which could active or inhibit the pathways critical for the initiation and progression of CRC, were detected (7). Several biomarkers have been established for the detection of metastatic CRC, including KRAS and RAS mutations (8,9). Additionally, the crucial pathways were also observed. Smith et al showed that tumor protein p53 promoted the progression of CRC through the alteration of genetic pathways (10). The nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway was reported to contribute to the carcinogenesis of CRC (11). MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are small RNAs that play central roles in cancer development via the regulation of its target genes. The altered expression of miR-21, miR-31, miR-143 and miR-145 was implicated in CRC progression (12). A recent study recruiting a genome-wide screening method identified 16 vital genes in CRC, such as SCARA5, which was affected by methylation (13). However, the comprehensive regulatory mechanisms of CRC, particularly the interplayed associations between miRNAs and genes, remain obscure. The present study utilized the expression profile data in the study by Khamas et al (13) to identify the differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between CRC tissues and paired normal control tissues. In addition, the interactions amongst the DEGs were further investigated through protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Furthermore, the miRNAs that targeted the DEGs were also predicted. As a whole, all these bioinformatical analyses were aimed to identify potential biomarkers for the prognosis and prevention of CRC, and to uncover the underlying regulatory mechanism of CRC progression.

Materials and methods

Gene expression profile data

The gene expression profile data GSE32323, which was deposited by Khamas et al (13), was used. The public Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), was utilized in the study. The platform used was GPL570 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). In the expression profile, there were 34 samples derived from the CRC patients, consisting of 17 from cancerous tissues (CRC samples) and 17 from paired normal tissues (control samples).

Identification of DEGs

Following the data preprocessing, including background correction and the transformation from probe level to gene symbol using the Affy package (14) in R language (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/affy.html), the data was subjected to normalization with the preprocessCore package (version 1.28.0; http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/3.0/bioc/html/preprocessCore.html) (15). Subsequently, the DEGs between CRC and normal samples were selected basing on a t-test of Linear Models for Microarray Analysis package in R (version 3.22.7; http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html) (16). The fold-change (FC) of the gene expression was also calculated. The threshold criteria for the DEG selection were P<0.05 and |log2FC| ≥1.

Functional enrichment analysis of the DEGs

To investigate the functions and processes that may be altered by the identified DEGs, the Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were performed, using the online tool of the Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery (version 6.7; http://david.abcc.Ncifcrf.gov/) (17), a potent program integrating the gene or protein functional annotations with graphical summary. The cut-off value for the screening of significant functions and pathways was P<0.05.

Establishment of the PPI network

The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database (version 9.1; http://string-db.org/) (18) was recruited to predict the potential interactions amongst the identified DEGs from the protein level. Only the interactions containing at least one DEG were filtered out to build the PPI network, with the criterion of a combined score of >0.4, as visualized by Cytoscape (version 3.2.1; http://cytoscape.org/) software (19).

Prediction of targets of microRNAs

Using the web-based gene set analysis toolkit (WebGestalt; Vanderbilt University, TN, USA; http://bioinfo.vanderbilt.edu/webgestalt/) (20), the regulatory miRNAs of the DEGs were selected.

Results

DEGs between CRC and normal samples

According to the aforementioned selection criteria, a set of 1,347 DEGs, including 659 upregulated genes and 688 downregulated genes, were identified.

Altered functions and pathways by the DEGs

As indicated in the results of the enrichment analysis (Table I), the upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in biological processes (BPs) that included the mitotic cell cycle (GO:0000278), nuclear division (GO:0000280) and the cell cycle (GO:0007049), and pathways such as the cell cycle (Hsa04110) and DNA replication (Hsa03030). For the downregulated DEGs, the over-represented functional GO terms were cellular response to zinc ion (GO:0071294), cellular response to chemical stimulus (GO:0070887) and cellular response to chemical stimulus (GO:0070887), while the prominent pathways were metabolic pathways (Hsa01100) and pancreatic secretion (Hsa04972) (Table II).
Table I.

GO and pathway enrichment analysis of the upregulated DEGs (top 5 in each category, as ranked by the P-value).

CategoryIDTermCountP-value
BPGO:0000278Mitotic cell cycle1022.63×10−24
BPGO:0000280Nuclear division552.26×10−22
BPGO:0007049Cell cycle1283.47×10−21
BPGO:0007067Mitosis551.25×10−18
BPGO:0022402Cell cycle process1171.15×10−18
CCGO:0031981Nuclear lumen1401.68×10−17
CCGO:0044428Nuclear region1582.32×10−16
CCGO:0043233Organelle lumen1641.44×10−15
CCGO:0031974Membrane-enclosed lumen1661.55×10−15
CCGO:0070013Intracellular organelle lumen1612.22×10−15
MFGO:0005515Protein binding3192.45×10−8
MFGO:0005488Binding4501.92×10−6
MFGO:0003678DNA helicase activity92.10×10−5
MFGO:0004386Helicase activity151.42×10−4
MFGO:0008009Chemokine activity81.70×10−4
KEGG pathwayHsa04110Cell cycle241.21×10−11
KEGG pathwayHsa03030DNA replication113.64×10−8
KEGG pathwayHsa03013RNA transport211.19×10−7
KEGG pathwayHsa03008Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes151.60×10−7
KEGG pathwayHsa04115p53 signaling pathway101.72×10−4

GO, gene ontology; DEGs, differentially-expressed genes; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; BP, biological process; CC, cell component; MF, molecular function; Count, numbers of DEGs enriched in each term.

Table II.

GO and pathway enrichment analysis of the downregulated DEGs (top 5 in each category, as ranked by the P-value).

CategoryIDTermCountP-value
BPGO:0071294Cellular response to zinc ion72.45×10−8
BPGO:0070887Cellular response to chemical stimulus1122.90×10−7
BPGO:0010035Response to inorganic substance323.18×10−7
BPGO:0006629Lipid metabolic process774.91×10−7
BPGO:0050896Response to stimulus3031.34×10−6
CCGO:0005615Extracellular space696.65×10−11
CCGO:0005576Extracellular region1313.24×10−10
CCGO:0044421Extracellular region part811.11×10−9
CCGO:0071944Cell periphery2241.50×10−9
CCGO:0016020Membrane3466.02×10−9
MFGO:0019955Cytokine binding121.47×10−6
MFGO:0097367Carbohydrate derivative binding209.75×10−6
MFGO:0008201Heparin binding161.03×10−5
MFGO:0005539Glycosaminoglycan binding182.74×10−5
MFGO:0016616Oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-OH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor143.79×10−5
KEGG pathwayHsa01100Metabolic pathways691.21×10−4
KEGG pathwayHsa04972Pancreatic secretion126.96×10−4
KEGG pathwayHsa04960Aldosterone-regulated sodium reabsorption71.29×10−3
KEGG pathwayHsa00910Nitrogen metabolism51.90×10−3
KEGG pathwayHsa00232Caffeine metabolism32.02×10−3

GO, gene ontology; DEGS, differentially-expressed genes; KEGG, kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; BP, biological process; CC, cell component; MF, molecular function; Count, numbers of DEGs enriched in each term.

PPI network of the DEGs

By mapping the DEGs into the STRING database, the potential interactions of the DEGs from the protein level were predicted. As a result, a PPI network comprising 1,478 edges and 462 nodes were established. A protein in the network serves as a ‘node’, and the ‘degree’ of a node represents the number of the interactions between two nodes. Based on this definition, the top ten nodes with high degrees in the PPI network were cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1; degree=59), cyclin B1 (CCNB1; degree=48), NDC80 kinetochore complex component (degree=45), non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G (degree=45), MAD2 mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (MAD2L1; degree=44), centromere protein F (degree=41), BUB1 mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase B (BUB1B; degree=39), centromere protein A (degree=37), PDZ-binding kinase (degree=36) and TPX2, microtubule nucleation factor (degree=36) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Protein-protein interaction network of the DEGs. Red nodes represent protein products of upregulated DEGs, green nodes represent protein products of downregulated DEGs and the lines between two nodes denote the interactions between them. DEGs, differentially-expressed genes.

Integrated miRNA-target regulatory network

Using the WebGestalt software, the integrated miRNA-target network was built, consisting of 459 nodes (305 miRNAs and 154 DEGs) and 646 edges (Fig. 2). In this network, the notable genes that were targeted by multiple miRNAs included SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 4 (SOX4; targeted by 27 miRs, including hsa-mir-129, hsa-mir-133a/b and hsa-mir-204), CCND1 (cyclin D1; targeted by 21 miRs, including hsa-let-7b, hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-16 and hsa-mir-195) and v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC; targeted by 10 miRs, including hsa-mir-34a, hsa-let-7c, hsa-mir-145 and hsa-mir-24.
Figure 2.

Integrated miRNA-target regulatory network. Red circle nodes represent protein products of upregulated DEGs, green circle nodes represent protein products of downregulated DEGs, pink triangular nodes represent miRNAs and the lines between two nodes denote the interactions between them. DEGs, differentially-expressed genes; miRNA/miR, microRNA.

Discussion

CRC is one of the most lethal cancers in the world (3). Biomarker therapeutic methods may be the most effective approaches for the management of CRC. In the present study, a total of 1,347 DEGs (659 upregulated and 688 downregulated) were identified between CRC and normal tissues. Among them, CDK1, CCNB1, MAD2L1 and BUB1B, which are mainly enriched in cell cycle-related BPs and pathways, were also the predominant nodes in the PPI network. The integrated miRNA-target network identified crucial genes, including SOX4 (targeted by hsa-mir-129, hsa-mir-133a/b and hsa-mir-204), MYC (targeted by hsa-mir-34a, hsa-let-7c, hsa-mir-145 and hsa-mir-24) and CCND1 (targeted by hsa-let-7b, hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-16 and hsa-mir-195), which were all enriched in cell cycle-related pathways. CDK1, CCNB1 and CCND1 were also associated with the p53 signaling pathways. Cell cycle-related genes that promote the proliferation of endothelial cells contribute to the progression of tumor growth and metastasis of CRC (21). CDK1 encodes for a serine/threonine kinase that controls the eukaryotic cell cycle by regulating mitotic onset, as well as the centrosome cycle (22). CDK1 promotes cell proliferation via phosphorylation and inhibition of forkhead box O1 transcription factor (23). The alteration of CDK1 has been found in numerous cancer types, including breast cancer (24), esophageal adenocarcinoma (25) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (26). Deregulated CDK1 has been found in CRC (27), and it has been demonstrated that cantharidin, the traditional Chinese medicine that could induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in various cancers, exerted the anticancer function via the inhibition of CDK1 activity (28). CCNB1 is a regulatory protein involved in mitosis (29). The increased expression of CCNB1 has also been observed in multiple cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (29) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (30). Moreover, CCNB1 serves as a biomarker for the prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (31). CCNB1 plays important roles in the cell proliferation at the G2 phase. It was previously verified that the suppression of CCNB1 by miR-93 resulted in the inhibition of tumor growth in CRC (32). MAD2L1 and BUB1B are two major mitotic spindle checkpoints. Previous studies considered that the mutation or deficiency in checkpoint proteins may contribute to enhancing the tumor development in breast cancer (33), and the mutation of BUB1, the paralog of BUB1B, was first reported in CRC (34). However, in contrast with these findings, Yuan et al validated the overexpression of MAD2L1 and BUB1B by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in breast cancer and proposed that it may alternatively be the overexpression of checkpoint genes that account for genomic instability (35). The high expression level of SOX4, the transcription factor responsible for the regulation of embryonic development and cell control, was significantly associated with the recurrence of CRC (36). Notably, it was reported that the oncogene SOX4 was regulated by miR-129-2 in endometrial cancer, and that the overexpression of SOX4 was partly caused by the suppression of miR-129-2 (37). MYC is a central gene that plays important regulatory roles in cell cycle progression. The deficiency of c-MYC inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells in numerous cancer types during the cell cycle through G1 into S phase (38), while the upregulation of MYC transcription by the SNP rs6983267 was demonstrated to promote the development of CRC (39). Moreover, a spectrum of studies has reported the suppression of MYC by miRNAs, including let-7a (40), miR-23a/b (41) and miR-145 (42), in various cancer types. Furthermore, the overexpression of stromal genes, such as collagen type I α2 chain (COL1A2), was also detected in CRC (43). In the present study, the aforementioned 7 genes were upregulated in CRC samples, and the genes were all enriched in cell cycle-related BP terms and pathways, implying that these genes mediated cell cycle pathways that may play a crucial role in the tumorigenesis and progression of CRC. Combining the previous confirmations with the present predicted miRNA-target interactions, it can be speculated that SOX4 may be the target of miR-129, while MYC may be targeted by hsa-mir-145 and hsa-let-7c. The p53 protein acts as a tumor suppressor, as it could prevent DNA damage by promoting cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase or by apoptosis. The alteration of genes in the p53 signaling pathway is tightly correlated with cancer development (44) CCND1 is a cyclin protein that functions as a regulator of CDKs, such as CDK4 or CDK6, during the cell cycle G1/S transition. Amplification of CCND1 has been observed in CRC (45) and the association between increased CCND1 and the activation of the p53 pathway has been established (46). Besides, the involvement of CDK1 and CCNB1 in the p53 signaling pathway have also been implied (47,48). The present findings indicated that CDK1, CCNB1 and CCND1 were all enriched in the p53 signaling pathway, providing a hint that the three genes may have vital roles in the progression of CRC by the regulation of the p53 signaling pathway. An extensive number of miRNAs downregulated the expression of CCND1, including miR-193b (49), miR-200b (50), miR-138b (51) and let-7b (52). Based on the correlations in the integrated miRNA-target network, CCND1 was regulated by 21 miRNAs, including hsa-let-7c, suggesting that CCND1 may be the target of hsa-let-7c. In conclusion, the cell cycle-related pathways mediated by the CDK1, CCNB1, MAD2L1, BUB1B, SOX4, COL1A2 and MYC genes, and the p53 signaling pathway regulated by the CDK1, CCNB1 and CCND1 genes may play important roles in the progression of CRC. All these genes may be used as biomarkers for the prognosis of CRC. Furthermore, SOX4 may be targeted by miR-129 and MYC by hsa-mir-145 and hsa-let-7c, while CCND1 may be the target of hsa-let-7c. However, further experimental validation is warranted to confirm these putative regulatory correlations.
  50 in total

1.  CDC2/CDK1 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma and precursor lesions serves as a diagnostic and cancer progression marker and potential novel drug target.

Authors:  Donna E Hansel; Surajit Dhara; RuChih C Huang; Raheela Ashfaq; Mari Deasel; Yutaka Shimada; Harold S Bernstein; John Harmon; Malcolm Brock; Arlene Forastiere; M Kay Washington; Anirban Maitra; Elizabeth Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer.

Authors:  Maria S Pino; Daniel C Chung
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  CCNB1 is a prognostic biomarker for ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Kun Ding; Wenqing Li; Zhiqiang Zou; Xianzhi Zou; Chengru Wang
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Genetic and epigenetic inactivation of mitotic checkpoint genes hBUB1 and hBUBR1 and their relationship to survival.

Authors:  Masayoshi Shichiri; Keigo Yoshinaga; Hisashi Hisatomi; Kenichi Sugihara; Yukio Hirata
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Increased expression of mitotic checkpoint genes in breast cancer cells with chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Bibo Yuan; Yi Xu; Ju-Hyung Woo; Yunyue Wang; Young Kyung Bae; Dae-Sung Yoon; Robert P Wersto; Ellen Tully; Kathleen Wilsbach; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53--alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gillian Smith; Francis A Carey; Julie Beattie; Murray J V Wilkie; Tracy J Lightfoot; Jonathan Coxhead; R Colin Garner; Robert J C Steele; C Roland Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Altered expression of miR-21, miR-31, miR-143 and miR-145 is related to clinicopathologic features of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  O Slaby; M Svoboda; P Fabian; T Smerdova; D Knoflickova; M Bednarikova; R Nenutil; R Vyzula
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.935

8.  Apigenin causes G(2)/M arrest associated with the modulation of p21(Cip1) and Cdc2 and activates p53-dependent apoptosis pathway in human breast cancer SK-BR-3 cells.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Choi; Gun-Hee Kim
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Dexter Duncan; Zhiao Shi; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Dysregulation of the transcription factors SOX4, CBFB and SMARCC1 correlates with outcome of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C L Andersen; L L Christensen; K Thorsen; T Schepeler; F B Sørensen; H W Verspaget; R Simon; M Kruhøffer; L A Aaltonen; S Laurberg; T F Ørntoft
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Survival stratification for colorectal cancer via multi-omics integration using an autoencoder-based model.

Authors:  Hu Song; Chengwei Ruan; Yixin Xu; Teng Xu; Ruizhi Fan; Tao Jiang; Meng Cao; Jun Song
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-12-14

2.  Effects of Sepantronium Bromide (YM-155) on the Whole Transcriptome of MDA-MB-231 Cells: Highlight on Impaired ATR/ATM Fanconi Anemia DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mazzio; Charles A Lewis; Rashid Elhag; Karam F Soliman
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.395

3.  Identification of Key Candidate Genes and Pathways in Colorectal Cancer by Integrated Bioinformatical Analysis.

Authors:  Yongchen Guo; Yonghua Bao; Ming Ma; Wancai Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Anticancer activity of calyx of Diospyros kaki Thunb. through downregulation of cyclin D1 via inducing proteasomal degradation and transcriptional inhibition in human colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Su Bin Park; Gwang Hun Park; Hun Min Song; Ho-Jun Son; Yurry Um; Hyun-Seok Kim; Jin Boo Jeong
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.659

5.  Development of a 21-miRNA Signature Associated With the Prognosis of Patients With Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Yin; Ying-Hui Jin; Yue Cao; York Wong; Hong Weng; Chao Sun; Jun-Hao Deng; Xian-Tao Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Effect of KNL1 on the proliferation and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Tianliang Bai; Yalei Zhao; Yabin Liu; Bindan Cai; Ning Dong; Binghui Li
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

7.  Identification of candidate genes and miRNAs associated with neuropathic pain induced by spared nerve injury.

Authors:  He Li; Hong-Quan Wan; Hai-Jun Zhao; Shu-Xin Luan; Chun-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.101

8.  Identification of Hub Genes and Immune Cell Infiltration Characteristics in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Ming Hu; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Identification of hub genes and immune cell infiltration characteristics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.

Authors:  Yangwang Pan; Linjing Wu; Shuai He; Jun Wu; Tong Wang; Hongrui Zang
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-08-17

10.  Smell Detection Agent Optimisation Framework and Systems Biology Approach to Detect Dys-Regulated Subnetwork in Cancer Data.

Authors:  Suma L Sivan; Vinod Chandra S Sukumara Pillai
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.