Literature DB >> 16428479

Increased expression of mitotic checkpoint genes in breast cancer cells with chromosomal instability.

Bibo Yuan1, Yi Xu, Ju-Hyung Woo, Yunyue Wang, Young Kyung Bae, Dae-Sung Yoon, Robert P Wersto, Ellen Tully, Kathleen Wilsbach, Edward Gabrielson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most breast cancers have chromosomal instability that seems related to defective mitotic spindle checkpoints. Because the molecular basis of this defect is unknown, we evaluated breast cancer cell lines and tissues for possible defects involving the major mitotic checkpoint genes responsible for maintaining chromosomal stability. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We analyzed sequences and expression levels (RNA and protein) of eight major spindle checkpoint genes (MAD1L1, MAD2L1, MAD2L2, BUB1, BUB1B, BUB3, CDC20, and TTK) in a panel of 12 breast cancer cell lines, most with established genetic instability and defective spindle damage checkpoint response. mRNA levels of these genes were also measured in primary tumor samples, and immunohistochemical staining was used to evaluate BUB1B protein levels in a panel of 270 additional cases of breast cancer.
RESULTS: No functionally significant sequence variations were found for any of the eight genes in the breast cancer cell lines with chromosomal instability. More surprisingly, the mRNA and protein levels for these checkpoint genes are significantly higher in the genetically unstable breast cancer cell lines and in high-grade primary breast cancer tissues than in the stable (and checkpoint proficient) MCF-10A and normal mammary epithelial cells, or in normal breast tissues. In fact, overexpression of the BUB1B protein is a marker that recognizes nearly 80% of breast cancers in paraffin-embedded tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: Defective mitotic spindle checkpoints in breast cancer are most likely not caused by low expression or mutations of these eight checkpoint genes. High levels of these particular transcripts could represent a cellular compensation for defects in other molecular components of the mitotic spindle damage checkpoint, and increased expression of these genes might be markers of breast cancers with chromosomal instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16428479     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  119 in total

1.  Deregulation of Rb-E2F1 axis causes chromosomal instability by engaging the transactivation function of Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome.

Authors:  Somsubhra Nath; Abhishek Chowdhury; Sanjib Dey; Anirban Roychoudhury; Abira Ganguly; Dibyendu Bhattacharyya; Susanta Roychoudhury
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Cellular abundance of Mps1 and the role of its carboxyl terminal tail in substrate recruitment.

Authors:  Tingting Sun; Xiaomei Yang; Wei Wang; Xiaojuan Zhang; Quanbin Xu; Songcheng Zhu; Robert Kuchta; Guanjun Chen; Xuedong Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Up-regulation of the mitotic checkpoint component Mad1 causes chromosomal instability and resistance to microtubule poisons.

Authors:  Sean D Ryan; Eric M C Britigan; Lauren M Zasadil; Kristen Witte; Anjon Audhya; Avtar Roopra; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Discovery of Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine TTK Inhibitors: CFI-402257 is a Potent, Selective, Bioavailable Anticancer Agent.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Radoslaw Laufer; Narendra Kumar Patel; Grace Ng; Peter B Sampson; Sze-Wan Li; Yunhui Lang; Miklos Feher; Richard Brokx; Irina Beletskaya; Richard Hodgson; Olga Plotnikova; Donald E Awrey; Wei Qiu; Nickolay Y Chirgadze; Jacqueline M Mason; Xin Wei; Dan Chi-Chia Lin; Yi Che; Reza Kiarash; Graham C Fletcher; Tak W Mak; Mark R Bray; Henry W Pauls
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Targeting MPS1 Enhances Radiosensitization of Human Glioblastoma by Modulating DNA Repair Proteins.

Authors:  Uday Bhanu Maachani; Tamalee Kramp; Ryan Hanson; Shuping Zhao; Orieta Celiku; Uma Shankavaram; Riccardo Colombo; Natasha J Caplen; Kevin Camphausen; Anita Tandle
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  Selective inhibition of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell growth by the mitotic MPS1 kinase inhibitor NMS-P715.

Authors:  Roger B Slee; Brenda R Grimes; Ruchi Bansal; Jesse Gore; Corinne Blackburn; Lyndsey Brown; Rachel Gasaway; Jaesik Jeong; Jose Victorino; Keith L March; Riccardo Colombo; Brittney-Shea Herbert; Murray Korc
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  Gene expression profiling in glioblastoma and immunohistochemical evaluation of IGFBP-2 and CDC20.

Authors:  Gianluca Marucci; Luca Morandi; Elisabetta Magrini; Anna Farnedi; Enrico Franceschi; Rossella Miglio; Daniela Calò; Annalisa Pession; Maria P Foschini; Vincenzo Eusebi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Targeting the cell cycle in breast cancer: towards the next phase.

Authors:  K L Thu; I Soria-Bretones; T W Mak; D W Cescon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  MAD2B, a novel TCF4-binding protein, modulates TCF4-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation.

Authors:  Chun-Fu Hong; Yu-Ting Chou; Young-Sun Lin; Cheng-Wen Wu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 is correlated with poor prognosis in small-cell lung cancer after surgical resection.

Authors:  Dandan Li; Qingwei Meng; Huijuan Zhang; Ting Feng; Meiyan Liu; Li Cai
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.