| Literature DB >> 28105125 |
Yueli Zou1, Hui Bu1, Li Guo1, Yajuan Liu1, Junying He1, Xuedan Feng1.
Abstract
Ziehl-Neelsen (Z-N) staining of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) is the cornerstone of the laboratory diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). However, the sensitivity of conventional Z-N staining for the detection of AFB in CSF specimens is suboptimal. The present study aimed to compare the practicality of modified Z-N staining with light microscopy and fluorescence microscopy in the same smear without auramine O. A total of 155 patients with 223 CSF specimens were enrolled and grouped according to the uniform case definition. The smears of each CSF specimen were subjected to modified Z-N staining and then observed using a light microscope under transmitted light and under fluorescence with a green-excitation wavelength in the same microscopic field. The results for different groups, inspection times, and prior to and following treatment were compared. Results indicated that the fuchsin-stained AFB were visible as bright orange-red fluorescing rods under fluorescence, or as red, lightly curved rods under transmitted light. The sensitivity of fluorescence microscopy was 96.2% while that of light microscopy was 84.6%. The positive rate of fluorescence microscopy was 79.2% prior to treatment compared with 61.7% post-treatment. In the same microscopic field, a greater number of AFB were observed using fluorescence compared with transmitted light, and AFB that were not visible under transmitted light were clearly observed under fluorescence. Furthermore, transmitted light and fluorescence could be interchanged directly when equivocal smears were encountered. The combination of modified Z-N staining and fluorescence microscopy without auramine O is sensitive and convenient for the diagnosis of TBM.Entities:
Keywords: Ziehl-Neelsen staining; cerebrospinal fluid; fluorescence microscopy; light microscopy
Year: 2016 PMID: 28105125 PMCID: PMC5228526 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Micrographs of acid-fast bacilli obtained with fluorescence microscopy and transmitted light microscopy (modified Z-N staining). The fuchsin-stained acid-fast bacilli revealed (A) bright orange-red fluorescing rods (shown by arrows) under fluorescence and (B) red, lightly curved rods (shown by arrows) under transmitted light (magnification, ×1,000). These rods were also visible (shown by arrows) by (C) fluorescence and (D) transmitted light microscopy at a lower magnification (×800).
Figure 2.Comparison of the morphologic changes prior to and following treatment (modified Z-N staining; magnification, ×1,000). The shapes of the acid-fast bacilli were diverse and appeared thin and slightly curved prior to treatment, and are shown (A) under fluorescence and (B) under transmitted light. However, the bacilli became shorter and thicker following treatment, as shown (C) under fluorescence and (D) under transmitted light.
Figure 3.Acid-fast bacilli as observed by light microscopy and fluorescence microscopy in the same microscopic field (modified Z-N staining). At low magnification (×800) acid-fast bacilli were (A) not detectable under transmitted light but (B) were detectable using fluorescence. At higher magnification (×1,000), acid-fast bacilli (C) remained undetectable under transmitted light but (D) were detectable using fluorescence.
Evaluation of the two observational methods in each diagnostic group.
| Positive results, n (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis type | Group | N | Fluorescence microscopy | Light microscopy |
| Patients | Definite | 27 | 27 (100) | 27 (100) |
| Probable | 22 | 17 (77.3) | 11 (50.0) | |
| Possible | 50 | 46 (92.0) | 44 (88.0) | |
| Control | 56 | 6 (10.7) | 6 (10.7) | |
| Sample | Definite | 52 | 41 (78.8) | 35 (67.3) |
| Probable | 39 | 28 (71.8) | 16 (41.0) | |
| Possible | 76 | 53 (69.7) | 45 (59.2) | |
| Control | 56 | 6 (10.7) | 6 (10.7) | |
Comparison of positive rates of tuberculous meningitis diagnosis for the two observational methods according to disease duration prior to hospitalization.
| No. of samples | ||
|---|---|---|
| Disease duration and diagnosis | Light microscopy | Fluorescence microscopy |
| <1 month | ||
| Positive | 59 | 65 |
| Negative | 9 | 3 |
| ≥1 month | ||
| Positive | 24 | 24 |
| Negative | 7 | 7 |