| Literature DB >> 28105040 |
Zhihao Su1, Bryce A Richardson2, Li Zhuo3, Xiaolong Jiang4.
Abstract
Population genetic studies provide a foundation for conservation planning, especially for endangered species. Three chloroplast SSRs (mtrnSf-trnGr, mtrnL2-trnF, and mtrnL5-trnL3) and the internal transcribed spacer were used to examine the population structure of Helianthemum in northwestern China. A total of 15 populations of the genus were collected. Nine chloroplast haplotypes and two nuclear genotypes were detected. Both the nuclear and chloroplast data showed two lineages in Helianthemum songaricum, respectively, distributed in Yili Valley and western Ordos Plateau. A total of 66.81% (p < 0.001) of the genetic variation was supported by this lineage split. A Mantel test showed a significant correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance (r = 0.937, p < 0.001). Based on genetic analyses, cpSSRs data support strong genetic divergence between regions. We speculate that the climate change during the late Tertiary and early Quaternary isolated H. songaricum into their current distribution, resulting in interruption of gene flow, leading to isolation and genetic divergence between the two regions. Meanwhile, possible selfing would increase genetic drift in small fragmented populations, that might account for the observed genetic divergence in both regions. Given the loss of genetic diversity and genetic divergence in small populations of Helianthemum in northwestern China immediate conservation management steps should be taken on the species.Entities:
Keywords: Helianthemum; Yili Valley; conservation implication; genetic diversity; genetic structure; western Ordos Plateau
Year: 2017 PMID: 28105040 PMCID: PMC5214710 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.02010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Sampling distribution of , the cp haplotype distribution (b), and ITS genotypes distribution in Helianthemum (c). Population numbers correspond to those in Table 1; cp haplotypes to those in Table 2, pie-charts represent haplotype frequency.
Details of sample locations, sample size, and genetic variation for 15 populations of .
| Yili Valley | 1 | Junmachang | JMC | 43.23 | 81.98 | 1318 | 10 | 8H1,2H2 | 8A |
| 2 | Heishantou | HST | 43.58 | 82.47 | 810 | 12 | 12H1 | 8A | |
| 3 | Kekesu | KKS | 43.2 | 81.93 | 1166 | 10 | 10H1 | 8A | |
| 4 | Zhongyangchang | ZYC | 43.57 | 82.57 | 952 | 12 | 12H1 | 8A | |
| 5 | Kebo | KB | 43.17 | 81.75 | 1246 | 10 | 10H1 | 8A | |
| 6 | Bole | BL | 44.83 | 82.05 | 566 | 8 | 8H3 | 8A | |
| 7 | Longkou | LK | 43.42 | 82.47 | 855 | 10 | 10H3 | 8A | |
| 8 | Kalabula | KLBL | 43.45 | 82.62 | 829 | 10 | 10H1 | 8A | |
| 9 | Baishidun | BSD | 43.68 | 82.05 | 1220 | 10 | 10H4 | 8A | |
| Western Ordos Plateau | 10 | Mengxi | MX | 39.8 | 106.88 | 1260 | 10 | 1H5,9H6 | 7B |
| 11 | Qianligou | QLG | 39.77 | 106.92 | 1450 | 10 | 2H5,8H6 | 7B | |
| 12 | Kabuqi | KBQ | 39.58 | 106.92 | 1248 | 12 | 4H5,2H6,2H7,4H8 | 8B | |
| 13 | Qipanjing | QPJ | 39.35 | 107.07 | 1328 | 12 | 8H5,2H6,2H9 | 8B | |
| 14 | Qianlishan | QLS | 39.85 | 106.93 | 1359 | 6 | 2H5,4H6 | 6B | |
| 15 | Hainan | HN | 39.45 | 106.98 | 1230 | 10 | 8H5,2H6 | 8B |
Figures before the genetic variation represent the number of the variation in the population.
Nine haplotypes of .
| H1 | 133 | 224 | 239 |
| H2 | 133 | 219 | 239 |
| H3 | 133 | 224 | 238 |
| H4 | 133 | 224 | 240 |
| H5 | 133 | 223 | 243 |
| H6 | 133 | 223 | 244 |
| H7 | 135 | 222 | 243 |
| H8 | 134 | 223 | 244 |
| H9 | 135 | 223 | 242 |
Figure 2Median-joining network of . The blank circles indicate missing or inferred haplotypes; the circle size is proportional to haplotype frequency; haplotypes in the network showed in the same colors correspond to those in the geographical distribution, Figure 1B.
Results of analysis of molecular variance for .
| Among populations | 14 | 81.473 | 0.5608 | 79.32 |
| Within populations | 137 | 20.033 | 0.1462 | 20.68 |
| Yili Valley vs. western Ordos Plateau | ||||
| Among geographic regions | 1 | 53.099 | 0.7002 | 66.81 |
| Among populations within regions | 13 | 28.375 | 0.2017 | 19.24 |
| Within populations | 137 | 20.033 | 0.1462 | 13.95 |
| Yili Valley | ||||
| Among populations | 8 | 21.791 | 0.2650 | 93.22 |
| Within populations | 83 | 1.600 | 0.0192 | 6.78 |
| western Ordos Plateau | ||||
| Among populations | 5 | 6.583 | 0.0983 | 22.36 |
| Within populations | 54 | 18.433 | 0.3414 | 77.64 |
P < 0.001.
Figure 3The figure shows a significant relationship between geographic and genetic distance (.
Figure 4Plots of the first two coordinates based on pairwise population differentiation (Nei' s) matrix of .
Figure 5Neighbor-Joining tree of the 15 .