Bram De Laere1, Pieter-Jan van Dam1, Tom Whitington2, Markus Mayrhofer2, Emanuela Henao Diaz3, Gert Van den Eynden4, Jean Vandebroek5, Jurgen Del-Favero6, Steven Van Laere1, Luc Dirix7, Henrik Grönberg2, Johan Lindberg8. 1. Centre for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 2. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Pathology, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium. 5. Department of Oncology, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium. 6. Multiplicom N.V., Niel, Belgium. 7. Centre for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Oncology, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium. 8. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: johan.lindberg@ki.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expression of the androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) is associated with poor response to second-line endocrine therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, a large fraction of nonresponding patients are AR-V7-negative. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if a comprehensive liquid biopsy-based AR profile may improve patient stratification in the context of second-line endocrine therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Peripheral blood was collected from patients with CRPC (n=30) before initiation of a new line of systemic therapy. We performed profiling of circulating tumour DNA via low-pass whole-genome sequencing and targeted sequencing of the entire AR gene, including introns. Targeted RNA sequencing was performed on enriched circulating tumour cell fractions to assess the expression levels of seven AR splice variants (ARVs). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Somatic AR variations, including copy-number alterations, structural variations, and point mutations, were combined with ARV expression patterns and correlated to clinicopathologic parameters. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Collectively, any AR perturbation, including ARV, was detected in 25/30 patients. Surprisingly, intra-AR structural variation was present in 15/30 patients, of whom 14 expressed ARVs. The majority of ARV-positive patients expressed multiple ARVs, with AR-V3 the most abundantly expressed. The presence of any ARV was associated with progression-free survival after second-line endocrine treatment (hazard ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 1.424-14.41; p=0.0105). Six out of 17 poor responders were AR-V7-negative, but four carried other AR perturbations. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive AR profiling, which is feasible using liquid biopsies, is necessary to increase our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning resistance to endocrine treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Alterations in the androgen receptor are associated with endocrine treatment outcomes. This study demonstrates that it is possible to identify different types of alterations via simple blood draws. Follow-up studies are needed to determine the effect of such alterations on hormonal therapy.
BACKGROUND: Expression of the androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) is associated with poor response to second-line endocrine therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, a large fraction of nonresponding patients are AR-V7-negative. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if a comprehensive liquid biopsy-based AR profile may improve patient stratification in the context of second-line endocrine therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Peripheral blood was collected from patients with CRPC (n=30) before initiation of a new line of systemic therapy. We performed profiling of circulating tumour DNA via low-pass whole-genome sequencing and targeted sequencing of the entire AR gene, including introns. Targeted RNA sequencing was performed on enriched circulating tumour cell fractions to assess the expression levels of seven AR splice variants (ARVs). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Somatic AR variations, including copy-number alterations, structural variations, and point mutations, were combined with ARV expression patterns and correlated to clinicopathologic parameters. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Collectively, any AR perturbation, including ARV, was detected in 25/30 patients. Surprisingly, intra-AR structural variation was present in 15/30 patients, of whom 14 expressed ARVs. The majority of ARV-positive patients expressed multiple ARVs, with AR-V3 the most abundantly expressed. The presence of any ARV was associated with progression-free survival after second-line endocrine treatment (hazard ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 1.424-14.41; p=0.0105). Six out of 17 poor responders were AR-V7-negative, but four carried other AR perturbations. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive AR profiling, which is feasible using liquid biopsies, is necessary to increase our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning resistance to endocrine treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Alterations in the androgen receptor are associated with endocrine treatment outcomes. This study demonstrates that it is possible to identify different types of alterations via simple blood draws. Follow-up studies are needed to determine the effect of such alterations on hormonal therapy.
Authors: Yingming Li; Rendong Yang; Christine M Henzler; Yeung Ho; Courtney Passow; Benjamin Auch; Suzanne Carreira; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Claudia Bertan; Tae Hyun Hwang; David A Quigley; Ha X Dang; Colm Morrissey; Michael Fraser; Stephen R Plymate; Christopher A Maher; Felix Y Feng; Johann S de Bono; Scott M Dehm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Anuradha Jayaram; Anna Wingate; Daniel Wetterskog; Vincenza Conteduca; Daniel Khalaf; Mansour Taghavi Azar Sharabiani; Fabio Calabrò; Lorraine Barwell; Susan Feyerabend; Enrique Grande; Alberto Martinez-Carrasco; Albert Font; Alfredo Berruti; Cora N Sternberg; Rob Jones; Florence Lefresne; Marjolein Lahaye; Shibu Thomas; Shilpy Joshi; Dong Shen; Deborah Ricci; Michael Gormley; Axel S Merseburger; Bertrand Tombal; Matti Annala; Kim N Chi; Ugo De Giorgi; Enrique Gonzalez-Billalabeitia; Alexander W Wyatt; Gerhardt Attard Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2019-09-24
Authors: Caitlin M Stewart; Prachi D Kothari; Florent Mouliere; Richard Mair; Saira Somnay; Ryma Benayed; Ahmet Zehir; Britta Weigelt; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Maria E Arcila; Michael F Berger; Dana Wy Tsui Journal: J Pathol Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 7.996