Kenneth S Kendler1, Sara Larsson Lönn1, Jessica Salvatore1, Jan Sundquist1, Kristina Sundquist1. 1. From the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.; the Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.; the Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.; the Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and the Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the magnitude and nature of the relationship between divorce and risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHOD: In a population-based Swedish sample of married individuals (N=942,366), the authors examined the association between divorce or widowhood and risk for first registration for AUD. AUD was assessed using medical, criminal, and pharmacy registries. RESULTS: Divorce was strongly associated with risk for first AUD onset in both men (hazard ratio=5.98, 95% CI=5.65-6.33) and women (hazard ratio=7.29, 95% CI=6.72-7.91). The hazard ratio was estimated for AUD onset given divorce among discordant monozygotic twins to equal 3.45 and 3.62 in men and women, respectively. Divorce was also associated with an AUD recurrence in those with AUD registrations before marriage. Furthermore, widowhood increased risk for AUD in men (hazard ratio=3.85, 95% CI=2.81-5.28) and women (hazard ratio=4.10, 95% CI=2.98-5.64). Among divorced individuals, remarriage was associated with a large decline in AUD in both sexes (men: hazard ratio=0.56, 95% CI=0.52-0.64; women: hazard ratio=0.61, 95% CI=0.55-0.69). Divorce produced a greater increase in first AUD onset in those with a family history of AUD or with prior externalizing behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Spousal loss through divorce or bereavement is associated with a large enduring increased AUD risk. This association likely reflects both causal and noncausal processes. That the AUD status of the spouse alters this association highlights the importance of spouse characteristics for the behavioral health consequences of spousal loss. The pronounced elevation in AUD risk following divorce or widowhood, and the protective effect of remarriage against subsequent AUD, speaks to the profound impact of marriage on problematic alcohol use.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the magnitude and nature of the relationship between divorce and risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHOD: In a population-based Swedish sample of married individuals (N=942,366), the authors examined the association between divorce or widowhood and risk for first registration for AUD. AUD was assessed using medical, criminal, and pharmacy registries. RESULTS: Divorce was strongly associated with risk for first AUD onset in both men (hazard ratio=5.98, 95% CI=5.65-6.33) and women (hazard ratio=7.29, 95% CI=6.72-7.91). The hazard ratio was estimated for AUD onset given divorce among discordant monozygotic twins to equal 3.45 and 3.62 in men and women, respectively. Divorce was also associated with an AUD recurrence in those with AUD registrations before marriage. Furthermore, widowhood increased risk for AUD in men (hazard ratio=3.85, 95% CI=2.81-5.28) and women (hazard ratio=4.10, 95% CI=2.98-5.64). Among divorced individuals, remarriage was associated with a large decline in AUD in both sexes (men: hazard ratio=0.56, 95% CI=0.52-0.64; women: hazard ratio=0.61, 95% CI=0.55-0.69). Divorce produced a greater increase in first AUD onset in those with a family history of AUD or with prior externalizing behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Spousal loss through divorce or bereavement is associated with a large enduring increased AUD risk. This association likely reflects both causal and noncausal processes. That the AUD status of the spouse alters this association highlights the importance of spouse characteristics for the behavioral health consequences of spousal loss. The pronounced elevation in AUD risk following divorce or widowhood, and the protective effect of remarriage against subsequent AUD, speaks to the profound impact of marriage on problematic alcohol use.
Authors: Jukka T Halme; Kaija Seppä; Hannu Alho; Sami Pirkola; Kari Poikolainen; Jouko Lönnqvist; Mauri Aalto Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Tinca J C Polderman; Beben Benyamin; Christiaan A de Leeuw; Patrick F Sullivan; Arjen van Bochoven; Peter M Visscher; Danielle Posthuma Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Sara Larsson Lönn; Jessica E Salvatore; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Sara Larsson Lönn; Jan Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Magnus Strømmen; Christian Andreas Klöckner; Kirsti Kverndokk Bjerkan; Hallvard Græslie; Dag Arne Lihaug Hoff; Gjermund Johnsen; Bård Kulseng; Ronald Mårvik; Siren Nymo; Jorunn Sandvik Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 5.555