Ludovica F Buttó1, Dirk Haller1. 1. a Technische Universität München, Chair of Nutrition and Immunology , Freising , Germany.
Abstract
Gut homeostasis involves interrelated biological networks that include the immune system, specialized cells of the epithelium, such as Paneth and goblet cells, as well as triggers derived from the microbiota. Disruption of these homeostatic interactions may lead to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). To develop more targeted and individual treatments in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, it becomes more and more important to link key mechanisms of the disease pathogenesis to distinct IBD subsets. For the first time, our laboratory demonstrated a causal role of the microbiota for the development of Crohn's disease (CD)-like ileitis, supporting the hypothesis that a non-infectious, dysbiotic microbial ecosystem harbors aggressive traits relevant for the induction of chronic inflammation in the disease-susceptible host (i.e. TNFΔARE mouse model). Despite a growing body of evidence claiming a primary role for Paneth cells in the pathogenesis of ileal CD, we showed in the TNFΔARE mouse model that Paneth cell failure or exhaustion is a secondary event to inflammation. Therefore, additional mechanisms may act synergistically to initialize the development of CD-like pathology. Hereby, we propose a novel hypothesis suggesting that individual development of dysbiotic communities is based on stochastic injury and focal inflammation of the epithelial lining that propagate radially, finally leading to an aggressive microbial milieu.
Gut homeostasis involves interrelated biological networks that include the immune system, specialized cells of the epithelium, such as Paneth and goblet cells, as well as triggers derived from the microbiota. Disruption of these homeostatic interactions may lead to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). To develop more targeted and individual treatments in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, it becomes more and more important to link key mechanisms of the disease pathogenesis to distinct IBD subsets. For the first time, our laboratory demonstrated a causal role of the microbiota for the development of Crohn's disease (CD)-like ileitis, supporting the hypothesis that a non-infectious, dysbiotic microbial ecosystem harbors aggressive traits relevant for the induction of chronic inflammation in the disease-susceptible host (i.e. TNFΔARE mouse model). Despite a growing body of evidence claiming a primary role for Paneth cells in the pathogenesis of ileal CD, we showed in the TNFΔARE mouse model that Paneth cell failure or exhaustion is a secondary event to inflammation. Therefore, additional mechanisms may act synergistically to initialize the development of CD-like pathology. Hereby, we propose a novel hypothesis suggesting that individual development of dysbiotic communities is based on stochastic injury and focal inflammation of the epithelial lining that propagate radially, finally leading to an aggressive microbial milieu.
Dysbiotic microbiota induces transmissible CD-like ileitis in susceptible host
Our laboratory recently demonstrated that germ-free (GF) TNFΔARE mice do not develop CD-like ileitis, supporting the initial hypothesis that bacterial triggers are essential tassels of disease pathogenesis. Of high relevance, only specific (dysbiotic) bacterial communities (so-called responder, “R,” or aggressive microbiota) are associated to a disease phenotype in these mice, capable to transmit disease once transferred into a GF susceptible host (TNFΔARE mice). In contrast, microbiota derived from wild-type (WT) as well as from healthy but disease susceptible hosts (so-called non-responder, “NR,” or non-aggressive microbiota) is unable to trigger disease once transferred into GF TNFΔARE mice. These results provide functional evidence that dynamic alterations of the microbial ecosystem (dysbiosis) cause transmissible disease in the susceptible host. The use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing demonstrated a clear shift in bacterial community structure of R and NR mice at the age of 8 weeks, culminating at 18 weeks of age and correlating with tissue pathology (Fig. 1A and B). In contrast, in early life, during the post weaning phase, R and NR microbiota clustered together, showing no signs of dysbiosis or inflammation (Fig. 1C). This piece of evidence suggests that shifts in microbiota composition develop with gradually increasing inflammation and occur after maternal separation. Therefore, the investigation in our laboratory revolves around unraveling the events that trigger changes in the microbiota toward the assembling of dysbiotic bacterial communities. This aspect should be studied by kinetics analysis of the microbiota in different organ systems and of the innate and adaptive immune response (e.g. granulocytes and effector T cells and/or antigen specific T cells) to determine whether the selection of dysbiotic microbiota is based on innate tissue activation or on antigen recognition.
Figure 1.
Bacterial profiles and functional dysbiosis mirror ileitis severity in TNFΔARE mice. (A) Independently from the litter of origin, SPF TNFΔARE mice housed in the same cage display a gradient of ileitis severity, ranging from not diseased (i.e., NR), low inflamed (i.e., lowR) and highly inflamed (R) (adapted from); and inflammation correlates to dysbiosis development in this mouse model. (B) β-diversity analysis shows separation of responder TNFΔARE mice (R) and low-responders (lowR), non-responders (NR) and WT littermate, all mice are 18 weeks of age (adapted from). (C) Lack of early changes in microbiota phylogeny and dysbiosis in SPF TNFΔARE mice. Non-parametrical multiple dimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis displaying phylogenetic distances between fecal bacterial communities of 4-week old TNFΔARE mice including mice that later in life develop severe (R), intermediate (lowR) and no disease (NR) (adapted from).
Bacterial profiles and functional dysbiosis mirror ileitis severity in TNFΔARE mice. (A) Independently from the litter of origin, SPF TNFΔARE mice housed in the same cage display a gradient of ileitis severity, ranging from not diseased (i.e., NR), low inflamed (i.e., lowR) and highly inflamed (R) (adapted from); and inflammation correlates to dysbiosis development in this mouse model. (B) β-diversity analysis shows separation of responder TNFΔARE mice (R) and low-responders (lowR), non-responders (NR) and WT littermate, all mice are 18 weeks of age (adapted from). (C) Lack of early changes in microbiota phylogeny and dysbiosis in SPF TNFΔARE mice. Non-parametrical multiple dimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis displaying phylogenetic distances between fecal bacterial communities of 4-week old TNFΔARE mice including mice that later in life develop severe (R), intermediate (lowR) and no disease (NR) (adapted from).
Gut epithelial stochastic injuries generate focal inflammation leading to a dysbiotic microbial ecosystem: A provoking hypothesis
It is very challenging to unravel the mechanisms by which inflammation drives bacterial taxa selection and molds microbiota into a disease-conditioning community. Since cage and litter effects were excluded, our current hypothesis rests on the assumption that morphological modifications of the epithelial interface, previously described as focal lesions, occur stochastically in the gut and may alter the local milieu affecting bacterial abundance and fitness. Actually, while a healthy host is able to seal off the damage, the susceptible individual lacks the ability to restore mucosal integrity, resulting in an altered gut milieu leading to barrier dysfunction and expansion of focal lesions (Fig. 2A and B). Based on the recently published evidence related to inflammation-mediated changes of bacterial gene expression, we believe that an inflammatory setting generated around focal lesions may up-regulate virulence-associated bacterial genes. We speculate that, in such an altered environment, bacterial taxa with aggressive or virulent features may find an ideal niche to propagate and to exert a negative selection on other beneficial commensals. Recent unpublished evidence reports that focal lesion occurrence is mouse strain dependent and that they are enriched in a selected bacterial community. Therefore, we suggest the hypothesis that focal lesions may fuel changes in the host microbiota, reprogramming its disease-conditioning nature, and that the transfer of such pre-selected community may results in dysbiosis-associated transmissible disease in a susceptible host (TNFΔARE mice).
Figure 2.
Stochastic occurrence of focal lesions in the gut lining generates local sites of inflammation. (A) The gut microbiota is constantly exposed to intrinsic (i.e., host genetics) and environmental factors (i.e., diet, smoking, antibiotics) that may induce non-permanent alteration in the bacterial community structure, leading to an homeostatic “alternative state.”6 However, the resilience of the gut microbiota may be lost in some pathologies, such as IBD, resulting in dysbiosis. (B) Our current hypothesis focuses on the formation in the epithelial lining of focal lesions, which cannot be sealed off in the genetic susceptible host. We speculate that the environmental milieu established in these lesions promotes the selection of specific bacterial taxa with aggressive and virulent features, which fuel inflammatory processes resulting in tissue pathology. Intact villi in GF mice (12 weeks old) are indicated by white arrows, while eroded villi are highlighted by orange arrows.
Stochastic occurrence of focal lesions in the gut lining generates local sites of inflammation. (A) The gut microbiota is constantly exposed to intrinsic (i.e., host genetics) and environmental factors (i.e., diet, smoking, antibiotics) that may induce non-permanent alteration in the bacterial community structure, leading to an homeostatic “alternative state.”6 However, the resilience of the gut microbiota may be lost in some pathologies, such as IBD, resulting in dysbiosis. (B) Our current hypothesis focuses on the formation in the epithelial lining of focal lesions, which cannot be sealed off in the genetic susceptible host. We speculate that the environmental milieu established in these lesions promotes the selection of specific bacterial taxa with aggressive and virulent features, which fuel inflammatory processes resulting in tissue pathology. Intact villi in GF mice (12 weeks old) are indicated by white arrows, while eroded villi are highlighted by orange arrows.
Paneth cell dysfunction does not precede inflammation and ileal pathology in TNFΔARE mouse model of CD-like ileitis
Abnormalities in Paneth cells structure and function have been increasingly recognized in IBD, and a growing body of evidence on Paneth cell lineage ablation supports their role in inflammation. Emerging data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in human cohorts also suggest that Paneth cells may play a critical role in the disease pathogenesis of IBD, specifically targeting CD. Key genes involved in Paneth cell function include XBP1, ORMDL3, NOD2, ATG16L1 and IRGM. The genetic deletion of Nod2 gene in mice results in Paneth cell dysfunction with a substantial reduction in the expression of a specific class of antimicrobial peptides (i.e., α-defensins) in the crypts of these mice, mirroring Paneth cell malfunction found in CD patients carrying the NOD2 mutation. Mice bearing mutations in genes associated with autophagy (ATG16L1 and IRGM genes) or in a gene involved in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response (XBP1) develop exacerbated intestinal inflammation and abnormalities in Paneth cell morphology and function, including diminished antimicrobial peptide secretion.It is necessary to acknowledge that not all studies support the finding that the deficiency of α-defensins expression is a predisposing factor for CD. For instance, Simms and coworkers showed that reduced levels of α-defensins are seen in CD, however this reduction is correlated with inflammation rather than with the NOD2 genotype of patients. This observation is in agreement with our findings, demonstrating that Paneth cell dysfunction is the consequence of inflammation rather than its cause. Of note, our transfer experiments of microbiota from R mice into GF TNFΔARE mice provided clear evidence that transcriptional activation of TNF and ileal pathology preceded Paneth cell dysfunction (Fig. 3). Failure of Paneth cell functionality, determined by the reduced protein expression of lysozyme and cryptdin-2 using immunofluorescence analysis, was an event subsequent to inflammation, and that was not caused by Paneth cell apoptosis in TNFΔARE mice. One tempting hypothesis is that the generation of reacting oxygen species (ROS) in response to inflammatory processes may lead to the functional exhaustion of Paneth cells. This is speculative and requires validation in TNFΔARE mice. It seems plausible to assume that the various IBD-related mouse models represent a distinct subset of patients and thus one subset of the disease pathogenesis.
Figure 3.
Inflammation (TNF levels in total tissue samples) and tissue pathology (CD-like ileitis H&E score) precede loss of Paneth cells function in TNFΔARE mouse model.
Inflammation (TNF levels in total tissue samples) and tissue pathology (CD-like ileitis H&E score) precede loss of Paneth cells function in TNFΔARE mouse model.
Conclusions and key open questions
Compositional and functional shifts in the intestinal microbial ecosystem are considered to represent key mechanisms in the pathogenesis of IBD. High-throughput sequencing analysis of microbial communities from patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis identified risk patterns associated with these distinct IBD phenotypes, however functional evidence for the existence of disease-conditioning ecosystems (dysbiosis) or the selection of single taxa (pathobionts) as underlying cause of chronic inflammation is still lacking. Until now, mechanistic studies about the role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of CD with predominant ileal inflammation were hampered by the lack of adequate GF mouse models. GF animal models susceptible to inflammatory pathologies are excellent tools to study the causal role of microbial ecosystems in disease initiation. However, when using a GF mouse model approach, it is essential to investigate bacterial colonization efficiency, which may be affected by several factors. In fact, a specific time window is required to develop a stable microbiota composition and a normal mucus system. Moreover, host mechanisms are important for the selection of a host-specific microbiota, e.g., host specificity, host immune system maturation, host gut selective pressure and host glycan repertoire. The use of antibiotics in place of GF mouse models should be carefully examined owing to the specific effects of antibiotics on different bacterial taxa, possibly resulting in selection of aggressive microbiota, and on the host epithelium, such as mucus thickening processes.For the first time, our laboratory showed that inflammation-associated changes in the microbiota caused transmissible disease in the genetically susceptible host (TNFΔARE mice) but not in WT recipients. Schaubeck and coworkers demonstrated that microbial communities, although developed under the same experimental conditions, may undergo progressive changes in their structures, leading to a more aggressive phenotype over time. The current goal is to identify the trigger that drives microbiota modification from neutral to aggressive nature. A growing body of evidence reports that several IBD susceptibility genes are associated with Paneth cell dysfunction. Nevertheless, in the TNFΔARE mouse model, Paneth cell loss was a secondary event to inflammation and tissue pathology. Given that TNF reduces epithelial barrier function by promoting sharp increases in tight junction permeability, it can be speculated that specific levels of TNF, such as those detected in lowR and R mice, are necessary to induce intestinal epithelial cells impairment, resulting in Paneth cell failure. To explain different grade of disease onset in our TNFΔARE mouse model, we propose that stochastic injuries in the gut mucosa generate focal inflammation leading to a dysbiotic microbial ecosystem with an individual selection of bacteria. This may explain the so far unmet effort to identify a unified microbial profile or single bacterial taxa responsible for the pathogenesis of IBD. Inflamed tissue areas in the gut are often enriched or depleted of selective bacterial taxa (e.g., Proteobacteria or Clostridia), most likely highlighting the fact that those bacteria quickly adapt to an altered milieu rather than being responsible for disease development.Despite these findings, we still have no understanding about the characteristic features of disease-conditioning (dysbiotic) microbial communities. Therefore, our long-term aim is to better identify the functional plasticity of complex microbial ecosystems toward changes in the intestinal milieu, such as those triggered by focal injuries and inflammation. Mechanistically, the most important question is centered on a systematic understanding of microbe-host interactions leading to the onset of disease. Most importantly, will it be possible to predict disease onset or relapse based on individual microbiota composition and function? Although fecal material transplantation (FMT) is a quite promising option for IBD treatment, its therapeutic efficacy is still poor, supporting the hypothesis that the selection patient-specific donor microbiota is not rationalized.In conclusion, a systematic investigation of the molecular mechanisms underpinning the development of dysbiosis in the context of stochastically appearing focal injuries in the gut mucosa is likely to offer new insights into the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory diseases.
Authors: Jan Wehkamp; Nita H Salzman; Edith Porter; Sabine Nuding; Michael Weichenthal; Robert E Petras; Bo Shen; Elke Schaeffeler; Matthias Schwab; Rose Linzmeier; Ryan W Feathers; Hiutung Chu; Heriberto Lima; Klaus Fellermann; Tomas Ganz; Eduard F Stange; Charles L Bevins Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-12-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Malin E V Johansson; Hedvig E Jakobsson; Jessica Holmén-Larsson; André Schütte; Anna Ermund; Ana M Rodríguez-Piñeiro; Liisa Arike; Catharina Wising; Frida Svensson; Fredrik Bäckhed; Gunnar C Hansson Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Luke Jostins; Stephan Ripke; Rinse K Weersma; Richard H Duerr; Dermot P McGovern; Ken Y Hui; James C Lee; L Philip Schumm; Yashoda Sharma; Carl A Anderson; Jonah Essers; Mitja Mitrovic; Kaida Ning; Isabelle Cleynen; Emilie Theatre; Sarah L Spain; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Philippe Goyette; Zhi Wei; Clara Abraham; Jean-Paul Achkar; Tariq Ahmad; Leila Amininejad; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Vibeke Andersen; Jane M Andrews; Leonard Baidoo; Tobias Balschun; Peter A Bampton; Alain Bitton; Gabrielle Boucher; Stephan Brand; Carsten Büning; Ariella Cohain; Sven Cichon; Mauro D'Amato; Dirk De Jong; Kathy L Devaney; Marla Dubinsky; Cathryn Edwards; David Ellinghaus; Lynnette R Ferguson; Denis Franchimont; Karin Fransen; Richard Gearry; Michel Georges; Christian Gieger; Jürgen Glas; Talin Haritunians; Ailsa Hart; Chris Hawkey; Matija Hedl; Xinli Hu; Tom H Karlsen; Limas Kupcinskas; Subra Kugathasan; Anna Latiano; Debby Laukens; Ian C Lawrance; Charlie W Lees; Edouard Louis; Gillian Mahy; John Mansfield; Angharad R Morgan; Craig Mowat; William Newman; Orazio Palmieri; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Uros Potocnik; Natalie J Prescott; Miguel Regueiro; Jerome I Rotter; Richard K Russell; Jeremy D Sanderson; Miquel Sans; Jack Satsangi; Stefan Schreiber; Lisa A Simms; Jurgita Sventoraityte; Stephan R Targan; Kent D Taylor; Mark Tremelling; Hein W Verspaget; Martine De Vos; Cisca Wijmenga; David C Wilson; Juliane Winkelmann; Ramnik J Xavier; Sebastian Zeissig; Bin Zhang; Clarence K Zhang; Hongyu Zhao; Mark S Silverberg; Vito Annese; Hakon Hakonarson; Steven R Brant; Graham Radford-Smith; Christopher G Mathew; John D Rioux; Eric E Schadt; Mark J Daly; Andre Franke; Miles Parkes; Severine Vermeire; Jeffrey C Barrett; Judy H Cho Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Timon E Adolph; Michal F Tomczak; Lukas Niederreiter; Hyun-Jeong Ko; Janne Böck; Eduardo Martinez-Naves; Jonathan N Glickman; Markus Tschurtschenthaler; John Hartwig; Shuhei Hosomi; Magdalena B Flak; Jennifer L Cusick; Kenji Kohno; Takao Iwawaki; Susanne Billmann-Born; Tim Raine; Richa Bharti; Ralph Lucius; Mi-Na Kweon; Stefan J Marciniak; Augustine Choi; Susan J Hagen; Stefan Schreiber; Philip Rosenstiel; Arthur Kaser; Richard S Blumberg Journal: Nature Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jun Xu; Ning Chen; Zhe Wu; Yang Song; Yifan Zhang; Na Wu; Feng Zhang; Xinhua Ren; Yulan Liu Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Joshua M Stern; Marcia Urban-Maldonado; Mykhaylo Usyk; Ignacio Granja; Daniel Schoenfeld; Kelvin P Davies; Ilir Agalliu; John Asplin; Robert Burk; Sylvia O Suadicani Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2019-02
Authors: Aimée Parker; Laura Vaux; Angela M Patterson; Amisha Modasia; Daniele Muraro; Alexander G Fletcher; Helen M Byrne; Philip K Maini; Alastair J M Watson; Carmen Pin Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 8.469