Literature DB >> 28102503

Reducing Unintended Pregnancies as a Strategy to Avert Zika-Related Microcephaly Births in the United States: A Simulation Study.

Katherine A Ahrens1, Jennifer A Hutcheon2, Loretta Gavin3, Susan Moskosky3.   

Abstract

Introduction There is increasing evidence that infection with the Zika virus (ZIKV) during pregnancy can lead to severe brain abnormalities in infants exposed in utero. The objective of our analysis was to estimate the contribution of enhanced contraception access to averting ZIKV-related microcephaly births in the United States, alone and in combination with another possible strategy, anti-ZIKV vaccination. Methods We used Monte Carlo sampling techniques (n = 100,000 simulations) to estimate the number of microcephaly births expected under strategies of enhanced contraception only, vaccination only, both enhanced contraception and vaccination, and status quo (no intervention). Enhanced contraceptive access was assumed to reduce unintended pregnancy rates by 46% and anti-ZIKV vaccination was assumed to be 90% effective. Plausible values for effectiveness of enhanced contraceptive access, ZIKV cumulative incidence, ZIKV-related microcephaly risk, and anti-ZIKV vaccination parameters were derived from the literature or best available knowledge. Results Enhanced contraceptive access alone reduced the median number of ZIKV-related microcephaly births by 16% (95% simulation interval: 5, 23), while the anti-ZIKV vaccine alone reduced these births by 9% (95% SI: 0, 18), 45% (95% SI: 36, 54), and 81% (95% SI: 71, 91), under conservative (10% vaccine uptake), moderate (50% vaccine uptake), and optimistic (90% vaccine uptake) scenarios, respectively. The reduction in ZIKV-related microcephaly births was always greater if both interventions were employed. Discussion Enhanced contraceptive access alone has the ability to produce a meaningful reduction in microcephaly births, and could provide an important adjuvant prevention strategy even following the development of a highly-effective anti-ZIKV vaccine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Microcephaly; Vaccination; Zika

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28102503     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2275-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  27 in total

1.  Preliminary Report of Microcephaly Potentially Associated with Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy - Colombia, January-November 2016.

Authors:  Esther Liliana Cuevas; Van T Tong; Nathaly Rozo; Diana Valencia; Oscar Pacheco; Suzanne M Gilboa; Marcela Mercado; Christina M Renquist; Maritza González; Elizabeth C Ailes; Carolina Duarte; Valerie Godoshian; Christina L Sancken; Angelica Maria Rico Turca; Dinorah L Calles; Martha Ayala; Paula Morgan; Erika Natalia Tolosa Perez; Hernan Quijada Bonilla; Ruben Caceres Gomez; Ana Carolina Estupiñan; Maria Luz Gunturiz; Dana Meaney-Delman; Denise J Jamieson; Margaret A Honein; Martha Lucia Ospina Martínez
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Ultrasound screening for fetal microcephaly following Zika virus exposure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Providing family planning care in the context of Zika: a toolkit for providers from the US Office of Population Affairs.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Colleen McNicholas; Jennifer Mullersman; Christina M Buckel; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  In the midst of Zika pregnancy advisories, termination of pregnancy is the elephant in the room.

Authors:  Ara Aiken; C E Aiken; J Trussell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Birth Defects Among Fetuses and Infants of US Women With Evidence of Possible Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Margaret A Honein; April L Dawson; Emily E Petersen; Abbey M Jones; Ellen H Lee; Mahsa M Yazdy; Nina Ahmad; Jennifer Macdonald; Nicole Evert; Andrea Bingham; Sascha R Ellington; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Titilope Oduyebo; Anne D Fine; Catherine M Brown; Jamie N Sommer; Jyoti Gupta; Philip Cavicchia; Sally Slavinski; Jennifer L White; S Michele Owen; Lyle R Petersen; Coleen Boyle; Dana Meaney-Delman; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Decreasing Unintended Pregnancy: Opportunities Created by the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Jared Fox; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Family Planning and Zika Virus: The Power of Prevention.

Authors:  Anne Burke; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.303

9.  Congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil: a case series of the first 1501 livebirths with complete investigation.

Authors:  Giovanny V A França; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini; Wanderson K Oliveira; Claudio M P Henriques; Eduardo H Carmo; Vaneide D Pedi; Marília L Nunes; Marcia C Castro; Suzanne Serruya; Mariângela F Silveira; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Reported Distribution of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus in the United States, 1995-2016 (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Micah B Hahn; Rebecca J Eisen; Lars Eisen; Karen A Boegler; Chester G Moore; Janet McAllister; Harry M Savage; John-Paul Mutebi
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Zika virus for infertility specialists: current literature, guidelines, and resources.

Authors:  Jamie P Dubaut; Nelson I Agudelo Higuita; Alexander M Quaas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Zika-Associated Microcephaly Epidemic and Birth Rate Reduction in Brazilian Cities.

Authors:  Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano; Daniele Maria Pelissari; Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines.

Authors:  Simon Pollett; Michael A Johansson; Nicholas G Reich; David Brett-Major; Sara Y Del Valle; Srinivasan Venkatramanan; Rachel Lowe; Travis Porco; Irina Maljkovic Berry; Alina Deshpande; Moritz U G Kraemer; David L Blazes; Wirichada Pan-Ngum; Alessandro Vespigiani; Suzanne E Mate; Sheetal P Silal; Sasikiran Kandula; Rachel Sippy; Talia M Quandelacy; Jeffrey J Morgan; Jacob Ball; Lindsay C Morton; Benjamin M Althouse; Julie Pavlin; Wilbert van Panhuis; Steven Riley; Matthew Biggerstaff; Cecile Viboud; Oliver Brady; Caitlin Rivers
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  A systematic review and evaluation of Zika virus forecasting and prediction research during a public health emergency of international concern.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Kobres; Jean-Paul Chretien; Michael A Johansson; Jeffrey J Morgan; Pai-Yei Whung; Harshini Mukundan; Sara Y Del Valle; Brett M Forshey; Talia M Quandelacy; Matthew Biggerstaff; Cecile Viboud; Simon Pollett
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-10-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.