| Literature DB >> 28102228 |
Gurudutt Pendyala1, Shinnyi Chou2, Yoosun Jung1, Pierluca Coiro1, Elizabeth Spartz1, Ragunathan Padmashri1, Ming Li2, Anna Dunaevsky1.
Abstract
Emerging epidemiology studies indicate that maternal immune activation (MIA) resulting from inflammatory stimuli such as viral or bacterial infections during pregnancy serves as a risk factor for multiple neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. Although alterations in the cortex and hippocampus of MIA offspring have been described, less evidence exists on the impact on the cerebellum. Here, we report altered expression of cytokines and chemokines in the cerebellum of MIA offspring, including increase in the neuroinflammatory cytokine TNFα and its receptor TNFR1. We also report reduced expression of the synaptic organizing proteins cerebellin-1 and GluRδ2. These synaptic protein alterations are associated with a deficit in the ability of cerebellar neurons to form synapses and an increased number of dendritic spines that are not in contact with a presynaptic terminal. These impairments are likely contributing to the behavioral deficits in the MIA exposed offspring.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28102228 PMCID: PMC5436129 DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology ISSN: 0893-133X Impact factor: 7.853
Figure 1MIA offspring display ASD core behavioral deficits but not motor coordination deficits. (a) MIA offspring generated distinct patterns of total vocalizations. There was no significant main effect of sex F1,46=0.006, P=0.94. There was a significant main effect of postnatal days, F4,90=4 8.340, P<0.001, and a significant postnatal day x condition interaction, F4,90=2.718, P=0.035. Examinations of individual postnatal days using one-way ANOVA indicated that compared to control offspring, MIA offspring emitted a significantly lower number of USVs on postnatal days 6 and 8, F1,75=5.560, P=0.021 and F1,75=4.988, P=0.029, respectively. MIA offspring emitted significantly more vocalizations on postnatal day 10 F1,75=7.665, P=0.007, as determined by one-way ANOVA based on postnatal day x condition interaction. (b) P40 MIA and control offspring were assessed for repetitive behavior by marble burying assay. MIA offspring (male, n=17 and female, n=18) displayed higher marble burying than control offspring male (n=16) and female (n=18) with main effects of sex (F1,65=4.7, P=0.03) and prenatal condition (F1,65=19.59, P<0.0001) but no significant sex x prenatal condition interaction (F1,65=0.0138, P=0.9). (c) MIA offspring display abnormal social interaction behaviors. Adult MIA (n=9) and control (n=9) offspring were repeatedly paired with the same partner for 3 sessions and a different partner in a fourth session. Arrows point to sessions with novel mouse pairing. There was a significant session x prenatal condition interaction, F3,14=5.144, P=0.013. Post hoc one way ANOVA comparisons of individual sessions showed that the control group had a significantly longer interaction time compared to the MIA group during session 1, F1,16=5.353, P=0.034. In the control mice there was no significance between session 1 and 4, but there was a significant decrease in the amount of time spent interacting from session 1 to 2, t(8)=3.451, P=0.009. MIA offspring showed an increase in interaction across sessions, with session 4 showing a significant increase in social behavior compared to session 1, t(8)=2.519, P=0.036. (d) Females showed better motor coordination and there was a significant main effect of sex (F1, 40=5.268, P=0.027). The main prenatal condition effect was not significant, F1,40=2.552, P=0.118, nor the sex × prenatal condition interaction, F(1, 40)=1.575, P=0.217. (e and f) To determine if MIA offspring display increased motor learning, mice were tested on additional trials at 4–40 r.p.m. and 8–79 r.p.m. There was no main effect of sex (F1,40=2.135, P=0.152) therefore both sexes were pooled. Although there was a significant main effect of trials for both the 4–40 r.p.m. trials (F5, 210=29, P<0.0001) and the 8–79 r.p.m. trials (F5,210=2.691, P=0.22), there was no significant main effect of prenatal condition (F1, 42=0.1479, P=0.702) and (F1, 42=1.391, P=0.24) for the 4–40 and the 8–79 r.p.m. trials respectively as determined by RM two-way ANOVA. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Figure 2Dynamic expression of cytokines and chemokines in the cerebellum throughout normal development. To illustrate changes in cytokine concentrations with age, the average values for each cytokine concentration in pg/ml of cerebellar lysate are plotted at the four ages examined. Values of mean±SEM concentration are included in Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 3(a) MIA induces long lasting changes in cerebellar cytokines throughout development. Multiplex array showing the differential expression of various immune molecules in the cerebellar lysates of MIA offspring compared to control values at different stages of development. The average fold-change and SEM in cytokine concentration in cerebellum from MIA offspring compared to control values is plotted. Values from MIA offspring are either black, red, or green, and the control values are superimposed in clear bars. Red and green bars indicate statistically significant increases or decreases, respectively, compared to controls (P<0.05). Increases are shown above 1 and decreases, below 1. Values of fold change and SEMs are included in Supplementary Table 2. (b) A heat map is used to summarize the results for MIA-induced changes in cytokines and chemokines. The degree of change is indicated by the depth of color as indicated in the lower panel. ND = below the level of detection.
Figure 4MIA induces increased expression of TNFα and TNFR1 during synaptogenesis. (a) Western blot showing an increase in TNFR1 expression in the cerebellar lysates of P14 MIA offspring. (b) Bar graphs showing significant increase in TNFR1 expression in MIA offspring (n=23) versus controls (n=26). (c) ELISA showing an increase in TNFα expression in the cerebellar lysates of MIA animals (n=22) versus controls (n=19). *P<0.05 as determined by an unpaired t-test.
Figure 5MIA induces a reduction in expression of synapse organizing proteins cerebellin-1 and GluRδ2. (a) Western blot showing a decrease in cerebellin-1 expression in the purified cerebellar synaptosomes of P14 MIA offspring (n=14) versus controls (n=20). (b) Western blot showing a decrease in GluRδ2 expression in the purified cerebellar synaptosomes of P14 MIA animals (n=17) versus controls (n=21). Bar graphs for both the proteins are represented below each western blot. *P<0.05 as determined by an unpaired t-test.
Figure 6MIA decreases glutamatergic synapse density on cerebellar Purkinje neuron from newborn offspring. (a and b) GFP-expressing Purkinje neurons in 14 day mixed cerebellar cultures from control and MIA offspring, respectively. Cells were immunostained for the excitatory presynaptic marker VGluT1 and the postsynaptic marker GluRδ2. (c) There are fewer dendritic spines with GluRδ2 puncta in MIA cultures. (d) There are fewer synapses (spines with GluRδ2 and VGluT1) in MIA cultures. Arrowheads in merged images point to spines without GluRδ2 or VGluT1 (green), spines with GluRδ2 only (red), or spines with GluRδ2 and VGluT1 (blue). *p<0.05.