Literature DB >> 28101740

Improving Parameter Inference from FRAP Data: an Analysis Motivated by Pattern Formation in the Drosophila Wing Disc.

Lin Lin1,2, Hans G Othmer3.   

Abstract

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is used to obtain quantitative information about molecular diffusion and binding kinetics at both cell and tissue levels of organization. FRAP models have been proposed to estimate the diffusion coefficients and binding kinetic parameters of species for a variety of biological systems and experimental settings. However, it is not clear what the connection among the diverse parameter estimates from different models of the same system is, whether the assumptions made in the model are appropriate, and what the qualities of the estimates are. Here we propose a new approach to investigate the discrepancies between parameters estimated from different models. We use a theoretical model to simulate the dynamics of a FRAP experiment and generate the data that are used in various recovery models to estimate the corresponding parameters. By postulating a recovery model identical to the theoretical model, we first establish that the appropriate choice of observation time can significantly improve the quality of estimates, especially when the diffusion and binding kinetics are not well balanced, in a sense made precise later. Secondly, we find that changing the balance between diffusion and binding kinetics by changing the size of the bleaching region, which gives rise to different FRAP curves, provides a priori knowledge of diffusion and binding kinetics, which is important for model formulation. We also show that the use of the spatial information in FRAP provides better parameter estimation. By varying the recovery model from a fixed theoretical model, we show that a simplified recovery model can adequately describe the FRAP process in some circumstances and establish the relationship between parameters in the theoretical model and those in the recovery model. We then analyze an example in which the data are generated with a model of intermediate complexity and the parameters are estimated using models of greater or less complexity, and show how sensitivity analysis can be used to improve FRAP model formulation. Lastly, we show how sophisticated global sensitivity analysis can be used to detect over-fitting when using a model that is too complex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRAP analysis; Parameter estimation; Sensitivity analysis; Wing disc

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28101740      PMCID: PMC5493054          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-016-0241-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  33 in total

1.  Three-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with the confocal scanning laser microscope.

Authors:  Kevin Braeckmans; Liesbeth Peeters; Niek N Sanders; Stefaan C De Smedt; Joseph Demeester
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A stochastic analysis of first-order reaction networks.

Authors:  Chetan Gadgil; Chang Hyeong Lee; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 3.  Morpheus unbound: reimagining the morphogen gradient.

Authors:  Arthur D Lander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Robustness of embryonic spatial patterning in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David Umulis; Michael B O'Connor; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The Intersection of Theory and Application in Elucidating Pattern Formation in Developmental Biology.

Authors:  Hans G Othmer; Kevin Painter; David Umulis; Chuan Xue
Journal:  Math Model Nat Phenom       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Are assumptions about the model type necessary in reaction-diffusion modeling? A FRAP application.

Authors:  Juliane Mai; Saskia Trump; Rizwan Ali; R Louis Schiltz; Gordon Hager; Thomas Hanke; Irina Lehmann; Sabine Attinger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Morphogen transport.

Authors:  Patrick Müller; Katherine W Rogers; Shuizi R Yu; Michael Brand; Alexander F Schier
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation.

Authors:  L Wolpert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Systems-level questions in Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  N Yakoby; C A Bristow; I Gouzman; M P Rossi; Y Gogotsi; T Schüpbach; S Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Syst Biol (Stevenage)       Date:  2005-12
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescence techniques in developmental biology.

Authors:  Sapthaswaran Veerapathiran; Thorsten Wohland
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Quantitative diffusion measurements using the open-source software PyFRAP.

Authors:  Alexander Bläßle; Gary Soh; Theresa Braun; David Mörsdorf; Hannes Preiß; Ben M Jordan; Patrick Müller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  A Model for the Hippo Pathway in the Drosophila Wing Disc.

Authors:  Jia Gou; Lin Lin; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.033

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.