| Literature DB >> 28101733 |
David Sarrut1,2, Jean-Noël Badel3, Adrien Halty4,3, Gwenaelle Garin3, David Perol3, Philippe Cassier3, Jean-Yves Blay3, David Kryza5,6, Anne-Laure Giraudet3.
Abstract
BACKROUND: Radiolabeled OTSA101, a monoclonal antibody targeting synovial sarcoma (SS) developed by OncoTherapy Science, was used to treat relapsing SS metastases following a theranostic procedure: in case of significant 111In-OTSA101 tumor uptake and favorable biodistribution, patient was randomly treated with 370/1110 MBq 90Y-OTSA101. Monte Carlo-based 3D dosimetry integrating time-activity curves in VOI was performed on 111In-OTSA101 repeated SPECT/CT. Estimated absorbed doses (AD) in normal tissues were compared to biological side effects and to the admitted maximal tolerated absorbed dose (MTD) in normal organs. Results in the tumors were also compared to disease evolution.Entities:
Keywords: Absorbed dose estimation; Monoclonal antibody; Monte Carlo simulation; Synovial sarcoma; Targeted radionuclide therapy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28101733 PMCID: PMC5241566 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-016-0172-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Phys ISSN: 2197-7364
Fig. 1Illustration of initial data (CT and SPECT images), time-integrated activity distribution, and absorbed dose distribution
Grading scale for lesions, with uptake compared to mediastinum and liver uptake
| Grade | Lesion uptake ratio |
|---|---|
| Grade 0 | Lesion uptake < 20% mediast. uptake |
| Grade I | Lesion uptake < 80% mediast. uptake |
| Grade II | Lesion uptake > 80% and < 120% mediast. uptake |
| Grade III | Lesion uptake > 120% mediast. and < 80% liver uptakes |
| Grade IV | Lesion uptake > 120% liver uptake |
Toxicity
| Patient | Injected activity (MBq) | Liver AD (Gy) | Liver toxicity grade | Bone marrow AD (Gy) | Toxicity grade L | Toxicity grade T | Toxicity grade A | Kidney AD (Gy) | Kidney toxicity grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 370 | 1.49 | 0 | 0.17 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 |
| 3 | 1110 | 3.39 | 0 | 0.27 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.76 | 1 |
| 3 bis | 1110 | 3.39 | 0 | 0.27 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.76 | 0 |
| 8 | 1110 | 8.78 | 0 | 1.47 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2.27 | 1 |
| 10 | 370 | 2.51 | 0 | 0.33 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.76 | 0 |
| 11 | 1110 | 4.79 | 0 | 1.38 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2.12 | 0 |
| 14 | 370 | 2.97 | 3 | 0.54 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0.98 | 0 |
| 15 | 1110 | 11.22 | 0 | 1.33 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2.48 | 0 |
| 20 | 1110 | 8.52 | 0 | 1.81 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2.62 | 0 |
Absorbed dose (AD) are indicated in Gy for the liver, bone marrow, and kidneys. Toxicity grades are indicated for the liver, leucopenia/lymphopenia (L), thrombocytopenia (T), anemia (A), and kidneys. Patient 3 has been treated with two injections
Visual (column 3) and computed (column 4) grading for lesions with grade higher than 0
| P. | L. | V grade | C grade | Com. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1 | I | I | |
| 2 | III | III | ||
| 8 a | 1 | III | III | |
| 2 | III | III | ||
| 3 | IV | IV | ||
| 4 | IV | III | Lower grade | |
| 10 a | 1 | III | II | Lower grade |
| 2 | II | II | ||
| 3 | II | II | ||
| 4 | I | I | ||
| 11 a | 1 | IV | II | Lower grade |
| 2 | I | I | ||
| 3 | II | I | Lower grade | |
| 4 | I | I | ||
| 5 | I | I | ||
| 15 a | 1 | II | I | |
| 17 | 1 | II | II | |
| 20 a | 1 | III | III | |
| 2 | III | II | Lower grade |
aPatients that have been indeed treated
Fig. 2Variation of %IA/kg with time for several organs (liver, heart, kidneys, bone marrow, and spleen). The patient weight in kilograms is also displayed
Fig. 3Variation of %peak-activity/kg with time for several lesions compared to the liver. Patients with a “T” indicated that they had been treated
Fig. 4Estimated absorbed dose in cGy by injected activity (MBq) in several VOI and lesions for all patients. Patient number is indicated close to the few lesions with the largest absorbed doses
Fig. 5Ratio between absorbed doses by lesions and the liver for all patients
Fig. 6Effective half-lives of several organs (liver, heart, kidneys, bone marrow, spleen, and whole patient) for all patients. Physical half-life of 111Indium is indicated by the horizontal line