Literature DB >> 28101665

Feasibility and Psychometric Properties of the Adjusted DSWAL-QoL Questionnaire for Dysphagic Patients with Additional Language and/or Cognitive Impairment: Part I.

Ingeborg S Simpelaere1,2, Jan Vanderwegen3,4, Kristien Wouters5,6, Marc De Bodt7,8,9, Gwen Van Nuffelen7,8,9.   

Abstract

The Swallowing Quality-of-Life questionnaire (SWAL-QoL) is considered the gold standard for assessing health-related quality of life in people with dysphagia. However, many dysphagic patients struggle to complete this questionnaire because of additional functional sequelae such as language impairment and cognitive disorders. In this study, we sought to develop an adjusted Dutch version of the SWAL-QoL (aDSWALQoL) and to evaluate its psychometric properties and feasibility compared with the original questionnaire. We developed the aDSWAL-QoL based on recommendations from previous literature. The feasibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion validity of the aDSWAL-QoL were evaluated in 78 dysphagic patients, among whom 43 had additional language and/or cognitive impairments (DysLC). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0. The aDSWAL-QoL had a higher degree of feasibility for the DysLC group. We obtained high Cronbach's α coefficients for total scale and for almost all subscales. Total aDSWAL-QoL scores showed excellent testretest agreement and good criterion validity with respect to the DSWAL-QoL. Almost all subscales showed significantly moderate to good test-retest agreement and criterion validity. However, the psychometric properties of the 'Food selection' subscale were inadequate. The aDSWAL-QoL is a feasible, reliable, and valid tool for use with DysLC patients. Conversion of the aDSWAL-QoL into an audio computer-assisted self-administered format should be investigated. The construct validity of the aDSWAL-QoL will be evaluated in a separate report.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition disorders; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Feasibility; Language disorders; Psychometrics; SWAL-QoL

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28101665     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-016-9770-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  43 in total

1.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.

Authors:  C C Preston; A M Colman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

2.  The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling.

Authors:  C A McHorney; D E Bricker; J Robbins; A E Kramer; J C Rosenbek; K A Chignell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.

Authors:  Ann Bowling
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire adjusted for people with aphasia.

Authors:  Ruth J Dalemans; Luc P de Witte; Anna J Beurskens; Wim J van den Heuvel; Derick T Wade
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Pui Mei Lam; Claudia Kam Yuk Lai
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity.

Authors:  Colleen A McHorney; Joanne Robbins; Kevin Lomax; John C Rosenbek; Kimberly Chignell; Amy E Kramer; D Earl Bricker
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: the usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQoL-5D.

Authors:  N J A van Exel; W J M Scholte op Reimer; M A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Angelique A Timmerman; Renée Speyer; Bas J Heijnen; Iris R Klijn-Zwijnenberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Aphasia in patients with ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Dragutin Kadojić; Bibijana Rostohar Bijelić; Ruzica Radanović; Mirko Porobić; Julija Rimac; Marinko Dikanović
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.780

10.  Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study.

Authors:  Palle Møller Pedersen; Kirsten Vinter; Tom Skyhøj Olsen
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 2.762

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relationship between Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment and Severe Dysphagia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jia Qiao; Zhi-Min Wu; Qiu-Ping Ye; Yong Dai; Zu-Lin Dou
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-19

2.  Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ingeborg S Simpelaere; Gwen Van Nuffelen; Marc De Bodt; Jan Vanderwegen; Tina Hansen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.186

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.