AIM: To determine the types, severity and evolution of aphasia in unselected, acute stroke patients and evaluate potential predictors for language outcome 1 year after stroke. METHODS: 270 acute stroke patients with aphasia (203 with first-ever strokes) were included consecutively and prospectively from three hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark, and assessed with the Western Aphasia Battery. The assessment was repeated 1 year after stroke. RESULTS: The frequencies of the different types of aphasia in acute first-ever stroke were: global 32%, Broca's 12%, isolation 2%, transcortical motor 2%, Wernicke's 16%, transcortical sensory 7%, conduction 5% and anomic 25%. These figures are not substantially different from what has been found in previous studies of more or less selected populations. The type of aphasia always changed to a less severe form during the first year. Nonfluent aphasia could evolve into fluent aphasia (e.g., global to Wernicke's and Broca's to anomic), whereas a fluent aphasia never evolved into a nonfluent aphasia. One year after stroke, the following frequencies were found: global 7%, Broca's 13%, isolation 0%, transcortical motor 1%, Wernicke's 5%, transcortical sensory 0%, conduction 6% and anomic 29%. The distribution of aphasia types in acute and chronic aphasia is, thus, quite different. The outcome for language function was predicted by initial severity of the aphasia and by the initial stroke severity (assessed by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale), but not by age, sex or type of aphasia. Thus, a scoring of general stroke severity helps to improve the accuracy of the prognosis for the language function. One year after stroke, fluent aphasics were older than nonfluent aphasics, whereas such a difference was not found in the acute phase. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
AIM: To determine the types, severity and evolution of aphasia in unselected, acute strokepatients and evaluate potential predictors for language outcome 1 year after stroke. METHODS: 270 acute strokepatients with aphasia (203 with first-ever strokes) were included consecutively and prospectively from three hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark, and assessed with the Western Aphasia Battery. The assessment was repeated 1 year after stroke. RESULTS: The frequencies of the different types of aphasia in acute first-ever stroke were: global 32%, Broca's 12%, isolation 2%, transcortical motor 2%, Wernicke's 16%, transcortical sensory 7%, conduction 5% and anomic 25%. These figures are not substantially different from what has been found in previous studies of more or less selected populations. The type of aphasia always changed to a less severe form during the first year. Nonfluent aphasia could evolve into fluent aphasia (e.g., global to Wernicke's and Broca's to anomic), whereas a fluent aphasia never evolved into a nonfluent aphasia. One year after stroke, the following frequencies were found: global 7%, Broca's 13%, isolation 0%, transcortical motor 1%, Wernicke's 5%, transcortical sensory 0%, conduction 6% and anomic 29%. The distribution of aphasia types in acute and chronic aphasia is, thus, quite different. The outcome for language function was predicted by initial severity of the aphasia and by the initial stroke severity (assessed by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale), but not by age, sex or type of aphasia. Thus, a scoring of general stroke severity helps to improve the accuracy of the prognosis for the language function. One year after stroke, fluent aphasics were older than nonfluent aphasics, whereas such a difference was not found in the acute phase. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Ethan Treglia; Michael Ho; Elina Kaplan; Shahid Bashir; Roy Hamilton; H Branch Coslett; Alvaro Pascual-Leone Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Matthew B Maas; Michael H Lev; Hakan Ay; Aneesh B Singhal; David M Greer; Wade S Smith; Gordon J Harris; Elkan F Halpern; Walter J Koroshetz; Karen L Furie Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Sundeep Teki; Gareth R Barnes; William D Penny; Paul Iverson; Zoe V J Woodhead; Timothy D Griffiths; Alexander P Leff Journal: Brain Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Sarah J Doran; Cassandra Trammel; Sharon E Benashaski; Venugopal Reddy Venna; Louise D McCullough Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Eun Kyoung Kang; Hae Min Sohn; Moon-Ku Han; Won Kim; Tai Ryoon Han; Nam-Jong Paik Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2009-12-26 Impact factor: 2.153